J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2021 Dec;47(6):476-479. 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.6.476.

Intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation in condylar fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Oral and Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction LAB, Brong Ahafo Regional Hospital, Sunyani, Ghana
  • 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

For treatment of mandibular condyle fracture, this article introduces the surgical protocol of intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation. This efficient, anatomically acceptable, extraoral scar-free, and relatively uncomplicated approach for condylar fracture can be compared with conventional extraoral fixation through various approaches. Clinical step-by-step procedures with a scientific basis were described in this technical strategy note.

Keyword

Mandibular condyle fracture; Intraoral reinsertion; Extracorporeal fixation; Intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A-C. Clinical photos of extracorporeal fixation and reduction in condylar head fracture showing lateral (A), posterior (B), and medial (C) views after fixation of the fractured segments. D. Reinsertion through an intraoral approach and re-fixation to the original ostectomy site (white arrows) under intramaxillary fixation (black arrows).

  • Fig. 2 Radiograms of bilateral condylar head fracture. Preoperative (A), after arch bar application with intermaxillary fixation (B), postoperative day 1 (C), postoperative 1 month (D), postoperative 3 months (E), and postoperative 1 year (F).

  • Fig. 3 Schematic drawings of representative surgical approaches in mandibular condylar fracture. Direct reduction and fixation via the (A) endaural or (B) submandibular approach, (C) extracorporeal fixation with vertical ramus osteotomy, (D) intraoral direct reduction and fixation with an angled driver or (E) transbuccal fixation with or without endoscopic visualization, and (F) intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation of the fractured fragment.


Cited by  1 articles

Incidence and management of mandibular fractures in a low-resource health facility in Ghana
Paul Frimpong, Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen, Buyanbileg Sodnom-Ish, Edinam Salia Nimatu, Nana Yaa Asantewaa Dampare, Roberta Rockson, Samuel Baffour Awuah, Emmanuel Kofi Amponsah, Cardinal Newton, Soung Min Kim
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;47(6):432-437.    doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.6.432.


Reference

References

1. Yao S, Zhou J, Li Z. 2014; Contrast analysis of open reduction and internal fixation and non-surgical treatment of condylar fracture: a meta-analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 25:2077–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001010. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001010. PMID: 25304143.
Article
2. Hackenberg B, Lee C, Caterson EJ. 2014; Management of subcondylar mandible fractures in the adult patient. J Craniofac Surg. 25:166–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000498. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000498. PMID: 24406572.
Article
3. Oruç M, Işik VM, Kankaya Y, Gürsoy K, Sungur N, Aslan G, et al. 2016; Analysis of fractured mandible over two decades. J Craniofac Surg. 27:1457–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002737. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002737. PMID: 27536913. PMCID: PMC5023768.
Article
4. Shi J, Jiao F, Xu B, Yu H. 2015; Transparotid approach in the treatment of intracapsular condylar fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 26:495–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001524. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001524. PMID: 25692894.
Article
5. Hong SO, Ohe JY, Lee DW. 2014; Salvage of the condylar fracture: complication management of mandibular angle ostectomy. J Craniofac Surg. 25:e582–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001028. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001028. PMID: 25376136.
Article
6. Kim JH, Kim SM, Kwon GJ, Park YW. 2008; Clinical review of various surgical approaches in the treatment of mandibular condyle fracture. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 30:72–82.
7. Kim SM, Kim JH. 2016; Commentary to "A follow-up study on extracorporeal fixation of condylar fractures using vertical ramus osteotomy". J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 42:236–7. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.236. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.236. PMID: 27598264. PMCID: PMC5009200.
Article
8. Park SY, Im JH, Yoon SH, Lee DK. 2014; A follow-up study on extracorporeal fixation of condylar fractures using vertical ramus osteotomy. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 40:76–82. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.76. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.76. PMID: 24868504. PMCID: PMC4028793.
Article
9. Park JM, Jang YW, Kim SG, Park YW, Rotaru H, Baciut G, et al. 2010; Comparative study of the prognosis of an extracorporeal reduction and a closed treatment in mandibular condyle head and/or neck fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68:2986–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.034. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.034. PMID: 20678847.
Article
10. Kannadasan K, Shenoy KV, Kengagsubbiah S, Priya V. V S. 2014; Extra corporeal fixation of fractured mandibular condyle. J Clin Diagn Res. 8:ZD41–3. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/10484.4914. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10484.4914. PMID: 25386546. PMCID: PMC4225998.
Article
11. Gali R, Devireddy SK, Venkata KK, Kanubaddy SR, Nemaly C, Dasari M. 2016; Preauricular transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for extracorporeal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Indian J Plast Surg. 49:59–65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.182254. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.182254. PMID: 27274123. PMCID: PMC4878246.
Article
12. Fayazi S, Bayat M, Bayat-Movahed S, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Rashad A. 2013; Long-term outcome assessment of closed treatment of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 24:735–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801373. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801373. PMID: 23714869.
Article
13. Vajgel A, de Santana Santos T, Camargo IB, Filho JR, de Holanda Vasconcellos RJ. Moraes de Oliveira D. 2013; Management of subcondylar fracture by intraoral approach. J Craniofac Surg. 24:587–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827c86c4. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827c86c4. PMID: 23524749.
Article
14. Neff A, Chossegros C, Blanc JL, Champsaur P, Cheynet F, Devauchelle B, et al. 2014; ; International Bone Research Association. Position paper from the IBRA Symposium on Surgery of the Head--the 2nd International Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis, Marseille, France 2012. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42:1234–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.005. PMID: 24831849.
Article
15. Conci RA, Tomazi FH Jr, Kalaoun R, Fritscher GG, de Oliveira GR, Heitz C. 2015; Modified submandibular access for open reduction and internal rigid fixation in condylar fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 26:232–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001099. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001099. PMID: 25478980.
Article
16. Pilanci Ö, Basaran K, Ceran F, Kuvat SV. 2014; Functional outcomes of preauricular underparotid retrograde approach for mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 25:1078–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000514. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000514. PMID: 24717314.
Article
17. Hwang K, Park JH, Lee HJ. 2005; Miniplate fixation of high condylar fracture and postoperative exercise regimen. J Craniofac Surg. 16:113–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200501000-00021. DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00021. PMID: 15699655.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr