J Adv Prosthodont.  2021 Dec;13(6):396-407. 10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.396.

Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis

• Choi SM
• Choi H
• Lee DH
• Hong MH

• KMID: 2524034
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.396

Abstract

PURPOSE
Zirconia has exceptional biocompatibility and good mechanical properties in clinical situations. However, finite element analysis (FEA) studies on the biomechanical stability of two-piece zirconia implant systems are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of the two-piece zirconia and titanium implants using FEA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two groups of finite element (FE) models, the zirconia (Zircon) and titanium (Titan) models, were generated for the exam. Oblique (175 N) and vertical (175 N) loads were applied to the FE model generated for FEA simulation, and the stress levels and distributions were investigated.
RESULTS
In oblique loading, von Mises stress values were the highest in the abutment of the Zircon model. The von Mises stress values of the Titan model for the abutment screw and implant fixture were slightly higher than those of the Zircon model. Minimum principal stress in the cortical bone was higher in the Titan model than Zircon model under oblique and vertical loading. Under both vertical and oblique loads, stress concentrations in the implant components and bone occurred in the same area. Because the material itself has high stiffness and elastic modulus, the Zircon model exhibited a higher von Mises stress value in the abutments than the Titan model, but at a level lower than the fracture strength of the material.
CONCLUSION
Owing to the good esthetics and stress controllability of the Zircon model, it can be considered for clinical use.

Keyword

3D model; Dental implant; Finite element analysis; Zirconia