Korean J Intern Med.  2021 Nov;36(6):1305-1319. 10.3904/kjim.2021.180.

Eosinophilic endotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: similarities and differences from asthma

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
  • 2Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • 4Singapore-HUJ Alliance for Research and Enterprise, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 5FAST and Chronic Programmes, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore

Abstract

Approximately 25% to 40% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have the eosinophilic endotype. It is important to identify this group accurately because they are more symptomatic and are at increased risk for exacerbations and accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in the 1st second. Importantly, this endotype is a marker of treat ment responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), resulting in decreased mortality risk. In this review, we highlight differences in the biology of eosinophils in COPD compared to asthma and the different definitions of the COPD eosinophilic endotype based on sputum and blood eosinophil count (BEC) with the corresponding limitations. Although BEC is useful as a biomarker for eosinophilic COPD endotype, optimal BEC cut-offs can be combined with clinical characteristics to improve its sensitivity and specificity. A targeted approach comprising airway eosinophilia and appropriate clinical and physiological features may improve identification of subgroups of patients who would benefit from biologic therapy or early use of ICS for disease modification.

Keyword

Pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive; Inhaled corticosteroids; Eosinophilia
Full Text Links
  • KJIM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr