J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Oct;36(39):e247. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e247.

Plagiarism in Non-Anglophone Countries: a Cross-sectional Survey of Researchers and Journal Editors

• Gupta L
• Tariq J
• Yessirkepov M
• Zimba O
• Misra DP
• Agarwal V
• Gasparyan AY

• KMID: 2521193
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e247

Abstract

Background
Plagiarism is one of the most common violation of publication ethics, and it still remains an area with several misconceptions and uncertainties.
Methods
This online cross-sectional survey was conducted to analyze plagiarism perceptions among researchers and journal editors, particularly from non-Anglophone countries.
Results
Among 211 respondents (mean age 40 years; M:F, 0.85:1), 26 were scholarly journal editors and 70 were reviewers with a large representation from India (50, 24%), Turkey (28, 13%), Kazakhstan (25, 12%) and Ukraine (24, 11%). Rigid and outdated pre- and post-graduate education was considered as the origin of plagiarism by 63% of respondents. Paraphragiarism was the most commonly encountered type of plagiarism (145, 69%). Students (150, 71%), nonAnglophone researchers with poor English writing skills (117, 55%), and agents of commercial editing agencies (126, 60%) were thought to be prone to plagiarize. There was a significant disagreement on the legitimacy of text copying in scholarly articles, permitted plagiarism limit, and plagiarized text in methods section. More than half (165, 78%) recommended specifically designed courses for plagiarism detection and prevention, and 94.7% (200) thought that social media platforms may be deployed to educate and notify about plagiarism.
Conclusion
Great variation exists in the understanding of plagiarism, potentially contributing to unethical publications and even retractions. Bridging the knowledge gap by arranging topical education and widely employing advanced anti-plagiarism software address this unmet need.

Keyword

Publishing; Plagiarism; Ethics; Writing; Limited English Proficiency; Periodicals as Topic; Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Physicians and scholars' perception of plagiarism.

Reference

1. Habibzadeh FA, Winker M. Duplicate publication and plagiarism: causes and cures. Notf Rettmed. 2009; 12:415.

2. Memon AR. Similarity and plagiarism in scholarly journal submissions: bringing clarity to the concept for authors, reviewers and editors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(27):e217. PMID: 32657084.

3. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021; 59(3):132–137. PMID: 34538939.

4. Fatima A, Sunguh KK, Abbas A, Mannan A, Hosseini S. Impact of pressure, self-efficacy, and self-competency on students' plagiarism in higher education. Account Res. 2020; 27(1):32–48. PMID: 31778079.

5. Rokni MB, Bizhani N, Habibzadeh F, Farhud DD, Mohammadi N, Alizadeh A, et al. Comprehensive survey of plagiarism in Iran. Pak J Med Sci. 2020; 36(7):1441–1448. PMID: 33235554.

6. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Seksenbayev B, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. J Korean Med Sci. 2017; 32(8):1220–1227. PMID: 28665055.

7. Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M. Information and misinformation on COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey study. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(27):e256. PMID: 32657090.

8. Roig M. Encouraging editorial flexibility in cases of textual reuse. J Korean Med Sci. 2017; 32(4):557–560. PMID: 28244278.

9. Dhammi IK, Ul Haq R. What is plagiarism and how to avoid it? Indian J Orthop. 2016; 50(6):581–583. PMID: 27904210.

10. Memon AR, Mavrinac M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of plagiarism as reported by participants completing the AuthorAID MOOC on research writing. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020; 26(2):1067–1088. PMID: 32067186.

11. Palla IA, Singson M, Thiyagarajan S. A comparative analysis of retracted papers in health sciences from China and India. Account Res. 2020; 27(7):401–416. PMID: 32279538.

12. Yi N, Nemery B, Dierickx K. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China. BMC Med Ethics. 2020; 21(1):44. PMID: 32487190.

13. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e34. PMID: 15471760.

14. Baydik OD, Gasparyan AY. How to act when research misconduct is not detected by software but revealed by the author of the plagiarized article. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(10):1508–1510. PMID: 27550475.

15. Misra DP, Ravindran V, Wakhlu A, Sharma A, Agarwal V, Negi VS. Plagiarism: a viewpoint from India. J Korean Med Sci. 2017; 32(11):1734–1735. PMID: 28960022.

16. Wolpe PR. Rethinking ethical categories in the age of technology. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020; 50(4):3.

17. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(4):249–253. PMID: 21186208.

18. Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(42):17028–17033. PMID: 23027971.

19. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. Updated editorial guidance for quality and reliability of research output. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33(35):e247. PMID: 30140192.

20. Misra DP, Ravindran V. Detecting and handling suspected plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021; 51(2):115–117. PMID: 34131662.

21. Memon AR. Similarity and plagiarism in scholarly journal submissions: bringing clarity to the concept for authors, reviewers and editors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(27):e217. PMID: 32657084.

22. Moore A. Predatory preprint servers join predatory journals in the paper mill industry…: plagiarism and malpractice breed rampantly in money-making incubators. BioEssays. 2020; 42(11):e2000259. PMID: 33084129.

23. Yessirkepov M, Nurmashev B, Anartayeva M. A Scopus-based analysis of publication activity in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2015: positive trends, concerns, and possible solutions. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30(12):1915–1919. PMID: 26713071.

24. Ahmed S, Anirvan P. The true meaning of plagiarism. Indian J Rheumatol. 2020; 15(3):155–158.

25. Zhang Y. Differences between anglophone and non-anglophone journals. Against Plagiarism. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Springer;2016.