J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Oct;36(38):e241. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e241.

Disparities between Uptake of Germline BRCA1/2 Gene Tests and Implementation of Post-test Management Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
To assess the rate of germline BRCA gene tests in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and uptake of post-test risk management strategies in BRCA1/2-mutated patients.
Methods
Institutional databases were searched to identify patients who were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC) between 2009 and 2019 in two academic hospitals. Retrospective review on medical records was performed to collect clinico-pathologic variables, including performance of germline BRCA gene test and its results, as well as conduct of breast cancer screening tests and cascade testing. If annual mammography +/− breast ultrasonography was performed, it was considered that regular breast cancer surveillance was done.
Results
A total of 840 women with EOC were identified during the study period. Of these, 454 patients (54.0%) received BRCA gene testing and 106 patients (106/454, 23.3%) were positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. The rate of BRCA tests has markedly increased from 25.8% in 2009-2012 to 62.7% in 2017-2019. Among the 93 patients with BRCA1/2 mutation without previous personal breast cancer history, 20 patients (21.5%) received annual mammography with or without breast ultrasonography for regular surveillance. Among the 106 BRCA1/2-mutated EOC patients, cascade testing on family members was performed only in 13 patients (12.3%).
Conclusion
Although BRCA1/2 gene tests have been substantially expanded, the uptake of post-test risk management strategies, including breast cancer screening for BRCA1/2-mutated patients and cascade testing for family members, has remained low. Strategies to increase its uptake and education about the importance of post-test risk managements are needed.

Keyword

BRCA1; BRCA2; Epithelial Ovarian Cancer; Breast Cancer Screening; Cascade Test

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Annual trend of BRCA gene testing prescription (♦), BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (▪), and breast cancer surveillance with mammography in EOC patients as a whole (▴) and EOC patients with BRCA mutations (x).EOC = epithelial ovarian cancer, MMG = mammography.


Reference

1. Harter P, Johnson T, Berton-Rigaud D, Park SY, Friedlander M, Del Campo JM, et al. BRCA1/2 mutations associated with progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients in the AGO-OVAR 16 study. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 140(3):443–449. PMID: 26740259.
Article
2. Norquist BM, Brady MF, Harrell MI, Walsh T, Lee MK, Gulsuner S, et al. Mutations in homologous recombination genes and outcomes in ovarian carcinoma patients in GOG 218: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(4):777–783. PMID: 29191972.
Article
3. Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, et al. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(1):77–102. PMID: 33406487.
4. Domchek SM, Robson ME. Update on genetic testing in gynecologic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(27):2501–2509. PMID: 31403865.
Article
5. Lee J, Kim S, Kang E, Park S, Kim Z, Lee MH, et al. Influence of the Angelina Jolie announcement and insurance reimbursement on practice patterns for hereditary breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2017; 20(2):203–207. PMID: 28690658.
Article
6. Kim SI, Lee M, Kim HS, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, et al. Germline and somatic BRCA1/2 gene mutational status and clinical outcomes in epithelial peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancer: over a decade of experience in a single institution in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 52(4):1229–1241. PMID: 32718143.
7. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017; 317(23):2402–2416. PMID: 28632866.
8. Kang E, Kim SW. The Korean hereditary breast cancer study: review and future perspectives. J Breast Cancer. 2013; 16(3):245–253. PMID: 24155753.
Article
9. Metcalfe KA, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Lynch H, Moller P, et al. International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer. 2008; 122(9):2017–2022. PMID: 18196574.
Article
10. Metcalfe K, Eisen A, Senter L, Armel S, Bordeleau L, Meschino WS, et al. International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Br J Cancer. 2019; 121(1):15–21. PMID: 30971774.
Article
11. Kim SI, Lim MC, Lee DO, Kong SY, Seo SS, Kang S, et al. Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among female BRCA mutation carriers: experience at the National Cancer Center of Korea. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016; 142(1):333–340. PMID: 26438354.
Article
12. Lee EG, Kang HJ, Lim MC, Park B, Park SJ, Jung SY, et al. Different patterns of risk reducing decisions in affected or unaffected BRCA pathogenic variant carriers. Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 51(1):280–288. PMID: 29747489.
Article
13. Choi MC, Lim MC, Lee M, Kim MK, Suh DH, Song YJ, et al. Practice patterns of hereditary ovarian cancer management in Korea. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27(5):895–899. PMID: 28498247.
Article
14. Passaperuma K, Warner E, Causer PA, Hill KA, Messner S, Wong JW, et al. Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(1):24–30. PMID: 22588560.
Article
15. Evans DG, Kesavan N, Lim Y, Gadde S, Hurley E, Massat NJ, et al. MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 145(3):663–672. PMID: 24687378.
Article
16. Gangi A, Cass I, Paik D, Barmparas G, Karlan B, Dang C, et al. Breast cancer following ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(12):1306–1313. PMID: 25372568.
17. Fong A, Cass I, John C, Gillen J, Moore KM, Gangi A, et al. Breast cancer surveillance following ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Am Surg. 2020; 86(10):1243–1247. PMID: 33106023.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr