Korean J Anesthesiol.  2021 Oct;74(5):394-408. 10.4097/kja.20304.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks compared to thoracic epidurals or multimodal analgesia for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • 2Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Unité de médecine familiale, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) have been investigated to control pain for abdominal surgery via midline laparotomy while avoiding the adverse events of opioid or epidural analgesia. The review compiles the evidence comparing CPNBs to multimodal and epidural analgesia.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review using broad search terms in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane. Primary outcomes were pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We rated the quality of the evidence using Cochrane and GRADE recommendations. The results were synthesized by meta-analysis using Revman.
Results
Our final selection included 26 studies (1,646 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in pain control comparing CPNBs to either multimodal or epidural analgesia (low quality evidence). Less opioids were consumed when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (mean difference [MD]: –16.13, 95% CI [–32.36, 0.10]), low quality evidence) and less when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: –31.52, 95% CI [–42.81, –20.22], low quality evidence). The length of hospital stay was shorter when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (MD: -0.78 days, 95% CI [-1.29, -0.27], low quality evidence) and shorter when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: -1.41 days, 95% CI [-2.45, -0.36], low quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference in PONV comparing CPNBs to multimodal (high quality evidence) or epidural analgesia (moderate quality evidence).
Conclusion
CPNBs should be considered a viable alternative to epidural analgesia when contraindications to epidural placement exist for patients undergoing midline laparotomies.

Keyword

Abdominal surgery; Catheter; Laparotomy; Multimodal analgesia; Nerve block; Regional anesthesia; Systematic review

Cited by  1 articles

Comparison of postoperative back pain between paramedian and midline approach for thoracic epidural anesthesia
Ji Hee Hong, Eun Young Cho, Jin Woo Shim, Ki Beom Park
Anesth Pain Med. 2022;17(3):320-326.    doi: 10.17085/apm.22139.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr