World J Mens Health.  2021 Oct;39(4):797-803. 10.5534/wjmh.210033.

COVID Pandemic Impact on Healthcare Provision and Patient Psychosocial Distress: A Multi-National Cross-Sectional Survey among Asia-Pacific Countries

Affiliations
  • 1AndroUrology Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 2Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Urology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Department of Urology, Airlangga University, Dr Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 5Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 6Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore
  • 7Department of Urology and Andrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 8Department of Urology, Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 9Centre of Andrology, Department of Urology, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 10Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • 11Department of Urology, Sanjukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
  • 12Department of Urology, Chulalongkorn University Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 13Andrology Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 14Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
  • 15AndroUrology Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Purpose
COVID pandemic significantly affected the delivery and maintenance of healthcare system, resulting in greater utilization of digital health interventions.
Materials and Methods
This multi-national cross-sectional survey was administered to clinicians working in major Asia-Pacific cities during the mandatory social lockdown period in June 2020. Clinical demographics and professional data, delivery of Andrology-related healthcare services, and patient distress based on validated questionnaires such as Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and Decisional Engagement Scale (DES) were collected.
Results
Telehealth medicine was instituted in all the centres with the majority of centres (92.9%) reported a 50% or more reduction in out-patient related services. The numbers of phone calls, emails correspondence and educational webinars have significantly increased. Despite the provision of reasons for changes in healthcare service and delay in surgery, more than half of the patients (57.1%) rated 2 on the DASS score for the item on patients over-react to situations, while a third of the patients (35.7%) scored a 2 for DASS item on patients being more demanding or unreasonable. The DES scores were more positive with most patients reported a score above 7 out of 10 in terms of items on accepting current arrangement (85.7%), confident in clinician decision-making about treatment (92.9%) and comfortable that the decision is consistent with their preferences (71.4%). Most patients (85.7%) indicated their preferences for more detailed information on healthcare provision.
Conclusions
Our study showed telehealth services were integrated early and successfully during the COVID pandemic and patients were generally receptive with minimal psychosocial distress.

Keyword

Andrology; COVID-19; Digital technology; Psychological distress; Telemedicine
Full Text Links
  • WJMH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr