Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 Aug;25(3):431-435. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.3.431.

Pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation with in situ size reduction for recipient-graft size matching

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

We present a case of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation using a reduced whole liver graft in a 25-month-old boy weighing 12.7 kg. After he had undergone Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia, his general condition deteriorated progressively. He was enrolled on the waiting list for liver transplantation with Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score of 15. The donor was a 51-monthold boy with body weight of 20 kg. The donor-to-recipient body weight ratio was 158%. The liver graft appeared to be larger than the recipient’s abdominal cavity. Thus, we planned to do in situ size reduction. Recipient surgery was performed following standard procedures. We performed graft outf low vein reconstruction using a modified piggyback technique like the double inferior vena cava method. Since the portal vein was hypoplastic, a side-to-side anastomosis technique was used. We also performed intraoperative portogram to embolize venous collaterals. After completing the graft implantation, we found that the liver graft was too large to be accommodated within the abdomen. After in situ resection of the left lateral section parenchyma, we successfully performed primary closure of the abdominal wound. This patient experienced episodes of acute rejection. He has been doing well for four years after the transplantation.

Keyword

Large-for-size graft; Pediatric transplantation; Graft-recipient weight ratio; Reduced graft; Left lateral section

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Pretransplant computed tomography (CT) taken at 1 year (A), 6 months (B), and 1 month (C) before transplantation showing progression of liver cirrhosis. Hypoplastic portal vein with development of collateral veins were visible at the CT scan taken at 1 month before transplantation (D).

  • Fig. 2 Intraoperative photographs showing in situ size reduction of the whole liver graft. The left lateral section parenchyma was transected (A) and removed (B) to perform primary closure of the abdominal wound.

  • Fig. 3 Gross photograph of the explanted native liver, showing hepatomegaly combined with advanced liver cirrhosis.

  • Fig. 4 Findings of intraoperative direct portography. The reconstructed portal vein showed good blood flow (A). Some collateral veins form the splenic hilum were identified (B, C) and completely embolized with coils (D).

  • Fig. 5 Posttransplant computed tomography (CT) scan follow-up. The CT scan taken 4 days after transplantation showed parenchymal ischemia at the right posterior section (A, B). The CT scan taken 14 days after transplantation showed resolution of the parenchymal ischemia (C, D). However, swelling of the liver graft and ascites developed because of acute cellular rejection.


Reference

1. Azouz SM, Diamond IR, Fecteau A. 2011; Graft type in pediatric liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 16:494–498. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32834a8c9c. PMID: 21836516.
Article
2. Bartlett A, Rela M. 2010; Progress in surgical techniques in pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 14:33–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2009.01209.x. PMID: 19659807.
Article
3. Spada M, Riva S, Maggiore G, Cintorino D, Gridelli B. 2009; Pediatric liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 15:648–674. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.648. PMID: 19222089. PMCID: PMC2653434.
Article
4. Hwang S, Lee SG, Park KM, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, et al. 2004; A case report of split liver transplantation for two adult recipients in Korea. Transplant Proc. 36:2736–2740. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.09.042. PMID: 15621136.
Article
5. Jung DH, Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, et al. 2017; In situ split liver transplantation for 2 adult recipients: a single-center experience. Ann Transplant. 22:230–240. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.902567. PMID: 28428535. PMCID: PMC6248301.
Article
6. Kanazawa H, Sakamoto S, Fukuda A, Uchida H, Hamano I, Shigeta T, et al. 2013; Living-donor liver transplantation with hyperreduced left lateral segment grafts: a single-center experience. Transplantation. 95:750–754. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827a93b4. PMID: 23503505.
7. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, et al. 1999; Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 67:321–327. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199901270-00024. PMID: 10075602.
8. Kasahara M, Fukuda A, Yokoyama S, Sato S, Tanaka H, Kuroda T, et al. 2008; Living donor liver transplantation with hyperreduced left lateral segments. J Pediatr Surg. 43:1575–1578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.056. PMID: 18675660.
Article
9. Vanatta JM, Esquivel CO. 2007; Status of liver transplantation in infants < 5 kg. Pediatr Transplant. 11:5–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00627.x.
10. Raices M, Czerwonko ME, Ardiles V, Boldrini G, D'Agostino D, Marcó Del Pont J, et al. 2019; Short- and long-term outcomes after live-donor transplantation with hyper-reduced liver grafts in low-weight pediatric recipients. J Gastrointest Surg. 23:2411–2420. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04188-y. PMID: 30887299.
Article
11. Sakamoto S, Kanazawa H, Shigeta T, Uchida H, Sasaki K, Hamano I, et al. 2014; Technical considerations of living donor hepatectomy of segment 2 grafts for infants. Surgery. 156:1232–1237. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.003. PMID: 24909347.
Article
12. Donaldson J, Obuchowski NA, Le RT, Lomaglio L, Unger RH, Bayona MDP, et al. 2019; Stenting for inferior vena cava stenosis after liver transplant. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 213:1381–1387. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20915. PMID: 31573847.
Article
13. Namgoong JM, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KM, Oh SH, Kim DY, et al. 2020; Portal vein reconstruction using side-to-side unification technique for infant-to-infant deceased donor whole liver transplantation. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 24:445–453. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.4.445. PMID: 33234747. PMCID: PMC7691192.
Article
14. Kim JH, Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK, Kim KR, Moon DB, et al. 2009; Transvenous variceal embolization during or after living-donor liver transplantation to improve portal venous flow. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 20:1454–1459. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.036. PMID: 19875063.
Article
15. Kidd JN Jr, Jackson RJ, Smith SD, Wagner CW. 2003; Evolution of staged versus primary closure of gastroschisis. Ann Surg. 237:759–764. discussion 764–765. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000071568.95915.DC. PMID: 12796571. PMCID: PMC1514688.
Article
16. Namgoong JM, Hwang S, Kim DY, Song GW, Ahn CS, Kim KM, et al. 2020; Pediatric split liver transplantation using a hyperreduced left lateral segment graft in an infant weighing 4 kg. Korean J Transplant. 34:204–209. DOI: 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.3.204.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr