Clin Endosc.  2021 Jul;54(4):563-569. 10.5946/ce.2020.109.

The Use of Endoscopic Clipping in Preventing Delayed Complications after Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumors

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea

Abstract

Background/Aims
Endoscopic resection (ER) has recently been accepted as the standard treatment modality for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors (SNADTs). However, the procedure can cause adverse events such as perforation and bleeding. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in the prevention of delayed complications.
Methods
A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent ER for SNADT from 3 centers was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the immediate clipping group (ICG) and the no clipping group (NCG). Various baseline characteristics and factors associated with the appearance of delayed complications, such as size of the lesion, tumor location, histologic type, and co-morbidities, were compared between the two groups.
Results
A total of 99 lesions from 99 patients were included in this study. Fifty-two patients were allocated into ICG and 47 patients were allocated into NCG. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient from ICG and in 8 patients from NCG. Delayed perforation occurred in 1 patient from ICG and in 3 patients from NCG. There were no procedure-related deaths in both groups.
Conclusions
Although the use of endoscopic clipping seemed to reduce the risk of developing delayed complications, further studies using a prospective design is required.

Keyword

Clipping; Complication; Endoscopic resection; Non-ampullary duodenal tumor

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow diagram of this study. GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

  • Fig. 2. Endoscopic clipping after endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal adenoma. (A) An adenoma is found at the second portion of the duodenum (white arrow heads). (B) Endoscopic mucosal resection with snare is performed. (C) A mucosal defect is noted after endoscopic mucosal resection (white arrow heads). (D) The mucosal defect is closed using an endoscopic clipping device.


Cited by  1 articles

Endoscopic Closure After Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumors
Satoshi Tanabe, Takuya Wada
Clin Endosc. 2021;54(4):453-454.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.123.


Reference

1. Fu YW, Lin MS, Yang B, Yu H, Jiao X, Huang JX. An early superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumor cured with endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2017; 14:3755–3759.
Article
2. Klein A, Nayyar D, Bahin FF, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large and giant lateral spreading lesions of the duodenum: success, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84:688–696.
Article
3. Shibagaki K, Ishimura N, Kinoshita Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors. Ann Transl Med. 2017; 5:188.
Article
4. Cortese AF, Cornell GN. Carcinoma of the duodenum. Cancer. 1972; 29:1010–1015.
Article
5. Kakushima N, Kanemoto H, Tanaka M, Takizawa K, Ono H. Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:12501–12508.
Article
6. Valerii G, Tringali A, Landi R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas: a retrospective analysis with long-term follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018; 53:490–494.
Article
7. Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Quénéhervé L, Margos W, et al. Comparative analysis of ESD versus EMR in a large European series of non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors. Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6:E1008–E1014.
Article
8. Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Quénéhervé L, Margos W, et al. ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6:E998–E1007.
Article
9. Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T, et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2014; 26:220–227.
Article
10. Hoteya S, Kaise M, Iizuka T, et al. Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal neoplasias might be prevented by prophylactic endoscopic closure: analysis of risk factors. Dig Endosc. 2015; 27:323–330.
Article
11. Fanning SB, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Chung A, Kariyawasam VC. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:805–812.
Article
12. Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumor. Digestion. 2017; 95:36–42.
Article
13. Fujihara S, Mori H, Kobara H, et al. Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:6595–6609.
Article
14. Tashima T, Ohata K, Sakai E, et al. Efficacy of an over-the-scope clip for preventing adverse events after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective interventional study. Endoscopy. 2018; 50:487–496.
Article
15. Doyama H, Tominaga K, Yoshida N, Takemura K, Yamada S. Endoscopic tissue shielding with polyglycolic acid sheets, fibrin glue and clips to prevent delayed perforation after duodenal endoscopic resection. Dig Endosc. 2014; 26(Suppl 2):41–45.
Article
16. Yahagi N, Kato M, Ochiai Y, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88:676–682.
Article
17. Ye LP, Mao XL, Zheng HH, et al. Safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal subepithelial lesions with wound closure using clips and an endoloop: an analysis of 68 cases. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:1070–1077.
Article
18. Kato M, Ochiai Y, Fukuhara S, et al. Clinical impact of closure of the mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89:87–93.
Article
19. Fujiwara S, Morita Y, Toyonaga T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rebamipide plus rabeprazole for the healing of artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46:595–602.
Article
20. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Goto O, Ogata H, Kanai T, Yahagi N. Effect of prophylactic clipping in colorectal endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5:859–867.
Article
21. Feagins LA, Nguyen AD, Iqbal R, Spechler SJ. The prophylactic placement of hemoclips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: an unnecessary practice? A case control study. Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59:823–828.
Article
22. Shirai Y, Ohki T, Yamamoto M. Application of the clip method, using thread, for duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection. BMJ Case Rep. 2016; 2016:bcr2016215677.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr