Anat Cell Biol.  2021 Jun;54(2):225-231. 10.5115/acb.20.314.

Comparison of decomposition rate of hind limbs of preserved mice with ethanol-glycerin and formaldehyde of advanced fixative solution

• Wijaya AN
• Margiana R
• Kusumaningtyas S
• Furqonita D

• KMID: 2516906
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5115/acb.20.314

Abstract

Learning anatomy in medical school is still closely based on the use of cadavers. The burial of preserved cadaver poses a problem, specifically, it contaminates the soil with formalin. Many studies have been conducted to find an alternative fixative to update or modify formalin usage. One of them is ethanol-glycerin (EG), which suggests promising results. Despite that fact, there has yet to be any research comparing the decomposition rate between EG and formalin. This study is conducted to compare the rate of decomposition between the two fixative solutions, EG and 4% formalin on the hind limb of mice. The mice were first preserved using a standard primary fixative solution which is 10% formalin, following that procedure is preservation using advanced fixative solution, EG or 4% formalin. Upon completing the preservation steps, the mice were buried for 6 weeks and observed weekly. The stages of decomposition were assessed semi-quantitatively depending on its appearance. The hind limbs of mice that were fixed with EG solution managed to reach the last stage of decomposition, dry & remains, while the 4% formalin group of mice still remained in the previous stage, advanced decay. It is concluded that the mice hind limbs that have been previously preserved with EG advanced fixative solution has a faster decomposition rate compared to 4% formalin.

Keyword

Burial; Glycerol; Mice; Preservation

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Mice’s hind limb decomposition stage each week. EG, ethanol-glycerin.

Reference

References

1. Inthasan C, Vaseenon T, Mahakkanukrauh P. 2020; Anatomical study and branching point of neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle. Anat Cell Biol. 53:422–34. DOI: 10.5115/acb.20.087. PMID: 32814704. PMCID: PMC7769108.

2. Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. 2015; Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol. 48:205–12. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.205. PMID: 26417481. PMCID: PMC4582164.

3. Thavarajah R, Mudimbaimannar VK, Elizabeth J, Rao UK, Ranganathan K. 2012; Chemical and physical basics of routine formaldehyde fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 16:400–5. DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.102496. PMID: 23248474. PMCID: PMC3519217.

4. Yogawisea S. 2017; Pengaruh konsentrasi cairan fiksatif formalin 10% dan 4% pada proses dekomposisi otot tungkai belkanag mencit.

5. Brenner E. 2014; Human body preservation- old and new techniques. J Anat. 224:316–44. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12160. PMID: 24438435. PMCID: PMC3931544.

6. Swenberg JA, Moeller BC, Lu K, Rager JE, Fry RC, Starr TB. 2013; Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment. Toxicol Pathol. 41:181–9. DOI: 10.1177/0192623312466459. PMID: 23160431. PMCID: PMC3893912.

7. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2021. Public health statement for formaldehyde [Internet]. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry;Chamblee, GA: Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=218&tid=39. cited 2018 Sep 15.

8. Saraswat P, Nirwan P, Saraswat S, Mathur P. 2008; Biodegradation of dead bodies including human cadavers and their safe disposal with reference to mortuary practice. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 30:273–80.

9. Żychowski J, Bryndal T. 2015; Impact of cemeteries on groundwater contamination by bacteria and viruses- a review. J Water Health. 13:285–301. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2014.119. PMID: 26042963.

10. Hammer N, Löffler S, Feja C, Sandrock M, Schmidt W, Bechmann I, Steinke H. 2012; Ethanol-glycerin fixation with thymol conservation: a potential alternative to formaldehyde and phenol embalming. Anat Sci Educ. 5:225–33. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1270. PMID: 22434588.

11. Hammer N, Löffler S, Bechmann I, Steinke H, Hädrich C, Feja C. 2015; Comparison of modified Thiel embalming and ethanol-glycerin fixation in an anatomy environment: potentials and limitations of two complementary techniques. Anat Sci Educ. 8:74–85. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1450. PMID: 24706536.

12. Cockle DL, Bell LS. 2017; The environmental variables that impact human decomposition in terrestrially exposed contexts within Canada. Sci Justice. 57:107–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.001. PMID: 28284436.

13. Ruggiero M, Cless D, Infantolino B. 2016; Upper and lower limb muscle architecture of a 104 year-old cadaver. PLoS One. 11:e0162963. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162963. PMID: 28033339. PMCID: PMC5199092.

14. Rosenthal N, Brown S. 2007; The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nat Cell Biol. 9:993–9. DOI: 10.1038/ncb437. PMID: 17762889.

15. Nguyen TL, Vieira-Silva S, Liston A, Raes J. 2015; How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis Model Mech. 8:1–16. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.017400. PMID: 25561744. PMCID: PMC4283646.

16. Johns Hopkins University. 2019. Animal care and use committee. The mouse [Internet]. Johns Hopkins University;Baltimore, MD: Available from: http://web.jhu.edu/animalcare/procedures/mouse.html. cited 2019 Jul 23.

17. Banerjee A, Chaudhury S. 2010; Statistics without tears: populations and samples. Ind Psychiatry J. 19:60–5. DOI: 10.4103/0972-6748.77642. PMID: 21694795. PMCID: PMC3105563.

18. Almulhim AM, Menezes RG. 2020. Evaluation of postmortem changes [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing;Treasure Island, FL: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554464/. cited 2019 Jul 15.

19. Lee Goff M. 2009; Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers. Exp Appl Acarol. 49:21–36. DOI: 10.1007/s10493-009-9284-9. PMID: 19554461.

20. Tamayo-Arango L, Garzón-Alzate A. 2018; Preservation of animal cadavers with a formaldehyde-free solution for gross anatomy. J Morphol Sci. 35:136–41. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669434.

21. Margiana R, Wijaya AN, Kusumaningtyas S, Furqonita D, Rahmadini . 2021; The comparison of hind limb mass loss in house mice preserved with advanced fixative solutions of ethanol- glycerin and 4% formaldehyde. Ann RSCB. 25:2087–93.