2. DeBenedet AT, Elmunzer BJ, McCarthy ST, Elta GH, Schoenfeld PS. 2013; Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 108:1696–1705. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2013.217. PMID:
23877349. PMCID:
PMC3840532.
Article
3. Maharshi S, Sharma SS. 2021; Early precut versus primary precut sphincterotomy to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 93:586–593. DOI:
10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.064. PMID:
32615179.
Article
4. Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, et al. 2020; ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 52:127–149. DOI:
10.1055/a-1075-4080. PMID:
31863440.
Article
5. Lee YS, Cho CM, Cho KB, et al. 2021; Difficult biliary cannulation from the perspective of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: identifying the optimal timing for the rescue cannulation technique. Gut Liver. 15:459–465. DOI:
10.5009/gnl19304. PMID:
32000469. PMCID:
PMC8129666.
Article
6. Tian C, Gamboa A, Chaudhury B, Willingham FF, Keilin S, Cai Q. 2013; Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 1:193–197. DOI:
10.1093/gastro/got024. PMID:
24759965. PMCID:
PMC3938000.
Article