Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 May;25(2):221-229. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.2.221.

The impact of portal vein resection on outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Portal vein resection (PVR) with major hepatic resection can increase the rate of curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). However, the oncologic role and safety of PVR is still debatable. This study aims to analyze PVR in terms of safety and therapeutic effectiveness.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 235 patients who had undergone major hepatic resection for HC with curative intent, including patients with PVR (PVR, n=35) consisting of PV invasion (PVR-A, n=9), No PV invasion (PVR-B, n=26); and patients without PVR (No PVR, n=200).
Results
There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality or postoperative morbidity between PVR and No PVR (2.9% vs. 1.0%; p=0.394 and 34.3% vs. 35.0%; p=0.875). The rate of advanced HC (T3: 40% vs. 12%; p<0.001 and nodal metastasis: 60% vs. 28%; p<0.001) was higher in PVR compared to No PVR. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival between PVR-A vs. PVR-B vs. No PVR. In multivariate analysis, estimated blood loss >600 ml (p=0.010), T3 diseases (p=0.001), nodal metastasis (p=0.001) and poor differentiation (p=0.002) were identified as independent risk factors for survival.
Conclusions
PVR does not increase postoperative mortality or morbidity. It showed a similar oncologic outcome, despite a more advanced disease state in patients with HC. Given these findings, PVR should be actively performed if necessary, after careful patient selection.

Keyword

Hilar cholanagiocarcinoma; Portal vein resection; Mortality; Morbidity; Oncologic outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Patients selection.

  • Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (A) 5-year overall survival rate (OSR) of PVR and No PVR (B) 5-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) of PVR and No PVR (C) 5-year OSR for PVR-A, PVR-B and No PVR (D) 5-year DFS for PVR-A, PVR-B and No PVR.


Reference

1. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. 2005; Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 366:1303–1314. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67530-7.
Article
2. Ito F, Cho CS, Rikkers LF, Weber SM. 2009; Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management. Ann Surg. 250:210–218. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afe0ab. PMID: 19638920.
Article
3. Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, Noie T, Takayama T, Kosuge T, et al. 2003; Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg. 238:73–83. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000074960.55004.72. PMID: 12832968. PMCID: PMC1422671.
Article
4. Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T. 2006; One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg. 244:240–247. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217605.66519.38. PMID: 16858186. PMCID: PMC1602147.
Article
5. Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ. 2005; Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 128:1655–1667. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.040. PMID: 15887157.
Article
6. Blechacz B, Gores GJ. 2008; Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 48:308–321. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22310. PMID: 18536057. PMCID: PMC2547491.
Article
7. Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T, Gores GJ. 2011; Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 8:512–522. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.131. PMID: 21808282. PMCID: PMC3331791.
Article
8. Deoliveira ML, Schulick RD, Nimura Y, Rosen C, Gores G, Neuhaus P, et al. 2011; New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 53:1363–1371. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24227. PMID: 21480336.
Article
9. de Jong MC, Marques H, Clary BM, Bauer TW, Marsh JW, Ribero D, et al. 2012; The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases. Cancer. 118:4737–4747. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27492. PMID: 22415526.
10. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, et al. 1999; Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 230:808–818. discussion 819DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00010. PMID: 10615936. PMCID: PMC1420945.
Article
11. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y. 2003; Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 238:720–727. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094437.68038.a3. PMID: 14578735. PMCID: PMC1356151.
12. Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, et al. 2007; Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery. 141:581–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.016. PMID: 17462457.
Article
13. Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Tsuchikawa T, Kato K. 2009; No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and routine portal reconstruction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 16:502–507. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0093-7. PMID: 19360368.
Article
14. Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Tsuchikawa T, Kato K, et al. 2010; Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 17:455–462. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0208-1. PMID: 19820891.
Article
15. Hemming AW, Mekeel K, Khanna A, Baquerizo A, Kim RD. 2011; Portal vein resection in management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 212:604–613. discussion 613–616. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.028. PMID: 21463797.
Article
16. Song SC, Choi DW, Kow AW, Choi SH, Heo JS, Kim WS, et al. 2013; Surgical outcomes of 230 resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a single centre. ANZ J Surg. 83:268–274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06195.x. PMID: 22943422.
Article
17. Edge SB. 2010. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Springer;New York:
18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. 2004; Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PMID: 15273542. PMCID: PMC1360123.
19. Kawarada Y, Das BC, Naganuma T, Tabata M, Taoka H. 2002; Surgical treatment of hilar bile duct carcinoma: experience with 25 consecutive hepatectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 6:617–624. DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00008-7.
Article
20. Chen W, Ke K, Chen YL. 2014; Combined portal vein resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 40:489–495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.231. PMID: 24685155.
Article
21. Bai T, Chen J, Xie ZB, Ma L, Liu JJ, Zhu SL, et al. 2015; Combined portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:21044–21052.
22. Kloek JJ, Ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. 2008; Surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of survival. HPB (Oxford). 10:190–195. DOI: 10.1080/13651820801992575. PMID: 18773053. PMCID: PMC2504374.
Article
23. Abbas S, Sandroussi C. 2013; Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of vascular resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 15:492–503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00616.x. PMID: 23750491. PMCID: PMC3692018.
Article
24. Muñoz L, Roayaie S, Maman D, Fishbein T, Sheiner P, Emre S, et al. 2002; Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation: long-term results after resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 9:237–241. DOI: 10.1007/s005340200025. PMID: 12140613.
Article
25. Song GW, Lee SG, Hwang S, Kim KH, Cho YP, Ahn CS, et al. 2009; Does portal vein resection with hepatectomy improve survival in locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma? Hepatogastroenterology. 56:935–942.
26. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Nishio H, Ebata T, Igami T, Matsushita M, et al. 2010; Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 252:115–123. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e463a7. PMID: 20531001.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr