Korean Circ J.  2021 Jun;51(6):504-514. 10.4070/kcj.2020.0448.

Comparative Surgical Outcomes of Prosthetic and Native Valve Endocarditis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
As a consequence of a growing number of patients undergoing prosthetic heart valve replacement, the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) has increased. The study aims to analyze patterns and outcomes of PVE surgery as compared with native valve endocarditis (NVE).
Methods
We enrolled 269 patients (aged 58.0±15.7 years) who underwent valve surgery for infective endocarditis (IE) between 2013 and 2019. Of these, 56 had PVE whereas remainder (n=213) had NVE. Clinical outcomes were compared and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine risk factors for mortality.
Results
The proportion of PVE among surgical IE gradually increased from 15.4% (11/71) in the first time-quartile to 29.5% (18/61) in the last time-quartile (p=0.055). PVE patients were older, and more commonly had aorto-mitral curtain involvement and abscess formation than NVE group. Early mortality was 14.3% and 6.1% in PVE and NVE group, respectively (p=0.049). Postoperatively, PVE group had higher incidences of low cardiac output syndrome (p=0.027), new-onset dialysis (p=0.006) and reoperation for bleeding (p=0.004) compared to NVE group, but stroke rates were comparable (p=0.503). During follow-up (648.8 patientyears), PVE group showed significantly higher risks of overall mortality (p<0.001), valve reinfection (p<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (p<0.001) than NVE group. On multivariable analysis, PVE (hazard ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–5.07; p=0.003) along with age, chronic kidney disease, multi-valve involvement, and causative organisms of Staphylococcus aureus or fungus were independent risk factors of overall mortality.
Conclusions
PVE carried significant perioperative risks, and was an independent risk factor of overall mortality.

Keyword

Endocarditis; Cardiac valve prosthesis; Recurrence; Mortality

Figure

  • Figure 1 Quartile trends in proportion of prosthetic valve endocarditis among surgical patients with infective endocarditis over time.NVE = native valve endocarditis; PVE = prosthetic valve endocarditis.

  • Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for the clinical outcomes. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve for the survival rates. (B) Kaplan-Meier curve for freedom from IE recurrence rates. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve for freedom from stroke rates. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve for freedom from PPM plantation.IE = infective endocarditis; PPM = permanent pacemaker.


Cited by  1 articles

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Upcoming Rising Issue in Increased Transcatheter Heart Valve Procedure Era
Seung Hyun Lee
Korean Circ J. 2021;51(6):515-517.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0045.


Reference

1. Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016; 387:882–893. PMID: 26341945.
Article
2. Perrotta S, Jeppsson A, Fröjd V, Svensson G. Surgical treatment of aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis: a 20-year single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101:1426–1432. PMID: 26453420.
Article
3. Moreillon P, Que YA. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2004; 363:139–149. PMID: 14726169.
Article
4. Romano G, Carozza A, Della Corte A, et al. Native versus primary prosthetic valve endocarditis: comparison of clinical features and long-term outcome in 353 patients. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004; 13:200–208. PMID: 15086258.
5. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85:1490–1495. PMID: 18355567.
Article
6. Pettersson GB, Hussain ST. Current AATS guidelines on surgical treatment of infective endocarditis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8:630–644. PMID: 31832353.
Article
7. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:3075–3128. PMID: 26320109.
8. Tae BS, Jeon BJ, Choi H, Cheon J, Park JY, Bae JH. α-blocker and risk of dementia in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nationwide population based study using the National Health Insurance Service Database. J Urol. 2019; 202:362–368. PMID: 30840545.
Article
9. Song SO, Jung CH, Song YD, et al. Background and data configuration process of a nationwide population-based study using the Korean National Health Insurance System. Diabetes Metab J. 2014; 38:395–403. PMID: 25349827.
Article
10. Tornos P, Iung B, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Infective endocarditis in Europe: lessons from the Euro heart survey. Heart. 2005; 91:571–575. PMID: 15831635.
Article
11. Mansur AJ, Dal Bó CM, Fukushima JT, Issa VS, Grinberg M, Pomerantzeff PM. Relapses, recurrences, valve replacements, and mortality during the long-term follow-up after infective endocarditis. Am Heart J. 2001; 141:78–86. PMID: 11136490.
Article
12. Iung B, Duval X. Infective endocarditis: innovations in the management of an old disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019; 16:623–635. PMID: 31175343.
Article
13. Manne MB, Shrestha NK, Lytle BW, et al. Outcomes after surgical treatment of native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93:489–493. PMID: 22206953.
Article
14. Weber C, Petrov G, Luehr M, et al. Surgical results for prosthetic versus native valve endocarditis: a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 161:609–619.e10. PMID: 31780064.
Article
15. Edlin P, Westling K, Sartipy U. Long-term survival after operations for native and prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95:1551–1556. PMID: 23562467.
Article
16. Della Corte A, Di Mauro M, Actis Dato G, et al. Surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis: a retrospective study of a national registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52:105–111. PMID: 28329161.
Article
17. Lalani T, Chu VH, Park LP, et al. In-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing early surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173:1495–1504. PMID: 23857547.
Article
18. Pericart L, Fauchier L, Bourguignon T, et al. Long-term outcome and valve surgery for infective endocarditis in the systematic analysis of a community study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102:496–504. PMID: 27131900.
Article
19. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169:463–473. PMID: 19273776.
20. Musci M, Hübler M, Amiri A, et al. Surgical treatment for active infective prosthetic valve endocarditis: 22-year single-centre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38:528–538. PMID: 20547069.
Article
21. Dohmen PM. Do we currently have guidelines to select an adequate prosthetic valve to surgically treat active infective endocarditis? Cardiol Ther. 2014; 3:73–76. PMID: 25135588.
Article
22. Toyoda N, Itagaki S, Tannous H, Egorova NN, Chikwe J. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve replacement for infective endocarditis: focus on recurrence rates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106:99–106. PMID: 29452115.
Article
23. AATS Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee Chairs. Pettersson GB, Coselli JS, et al. 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Executive summary. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153:1241–1258.e29. PMID: 28365016.
Article
24. Pettersson GB, Hussain ST, Shrestha NK, et al. Infective endocarditis: an atlas of disease progression for describing, staging, coding, and understanding the pathology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147:1142–1149.e2. PMID: 24507402.
Article
25. Graupner C, Vilacosta I, SanRomán J, et al. Periannular extension of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39:1204–1211. PMID: 11923047.
Article
26. Wiggins NB, Chong DT, Houghtaling PL, et al. Incidence, indications, risk factors, and survival of patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation after open heart surgery. Europace. 2017; 19:1335–1342. PMID: 27738074.
Article
27. Hill TE, Kiehl EL, Shrestha NK, et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker requirement after cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019; [Epub ahead of print].
Article
28. Toyoda N, Itagaki S, Egorova NN, et al. Real-world outcomes of surgery for native mitral valve endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 154:1906–1912.e9. PMID: 28942975.
Article
29. Harky A, Hof A, Garner M, Froghi S, Bashir M. Mitral valve repair or replacement in native valve endocarditis? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2018; 33:364–371. PMID: 29926515.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr