1. Lim T. Population aging in Korea: macroeconomic impacts and financing national health insurance. Korean Econ Rev. 2016; 32(2):355–82.
2. Abrashkin KA, Zhang J, Poku A. Acute, post-acute, and primary care utilization in a home-based primary care program during COVID-19. Gerontologist. 2021; 61(1):78–85.
Article
3. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2015.
4. Cardozo L, Steinberg J. Telemedicine for recently discharged older patients. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(1):49–55.
Article
5. Jasemian Y. Elderly comfort and compliance to modern telemedicine system at home. In : Proceedings of 2008, 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2018 Jan 30–Feb 1; Tampere, Finland. p. 60–3.
Article
6. Melkas H, Hennala L, Pekkarinen S, Kyrki V. Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions. Int J Med Inform. 2020; 134:104041.
Article
7. Can WS, Seibt SD. Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: a recognition-theoretical approach. Seibt J, editor. What social robots can and should do. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press;2016. p. 155–63.
8. Mshali H, Lemlouma T, Moloney M, Magoni D. A survey on health monitoring systems for health smart homes. Int J Ind Ergon. 2018; 66:26–56.
Article
9. Pal D, Triyason T, Funikul S. Smart homes and quality of life for the elderly: a systematic review. In : Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM); 2017 Dec 11–13; Taichung, Taiwan. p. 413–9.
Article
10. Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Miguel-Cruz A, Rincon AR. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 91:44–59.
Article
11. Guner H, Acarturk C. The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2020; 19(2):311–30.
Article
12. Kapadia V, Ariani A, Li J, Ray PK. Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care. Int J Med Inform. 2015; 84(11):892–900.
Article
13. Schreurs K, Quan-Haase A, Martin K. Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Can J Commun. 2017; 42(2):359–377.
Article
14. Agudo-Prado S, Pascual-Sevillana MA, Fombona-Cadavieco J. Uses of digital tools among the elderly. Revista Comunicar. 2012; 20(39):193–201.
Article
15. Fisher JD, Fisher WA. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, editors. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: strategies for improving public health. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass;2002. p. 40–70.
16. Heerink M. Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. In : Proceedings of 2011, 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI); 2011 Mar 8–11; Lausanne, Switzerland. p. 147–8.
Article
17. Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013; 76(6):913–34.
18. Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inform. 2018; 9(3):604–34.
Article
19. Vassli LT, Farshchian BA. Acceptance of health-related ICT among elderly people living in the community: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018; 34(2):99–116.
Article
20. Oh YS, Choi EY, Kim YS. Predictors of smartphone uses for health information seeking in the Korean elderly. Soc Work Public Health. 2018; 33(1):43–54.
Article
21. Rasche P, Wille M, Brohl C, Theis S, Schafer K, Knobe M, et al. Prevalence of health app use among older adults in Germany: national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(1):e26.
Article
22. Pal D, Funilkul S, Charoenkitkarn N, Kanthamanon P. Internet-of-things and smart homes for elderly healthcare: an end user perspective. IEEE Access. 2018; 6:10483–96.
Article
23. Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo IH, Li X, Broadbent E. People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Human Behav. 2015; 43:112–7.
Article
24. Castilla D, Botella C, Miralles I, Breton-Lopez J, Dragomir-Davis AM, Zaragoza I, et al. Teaching digital literacy skills to the elderly using a social network with linear navigation: a case study in a rural area. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2018; 118:24–37.
Article
25. Xue L, Yen CC, Chang L, Chan HC, Tai BC, Tan SB, et al. An exploratory study of ageing women’s perception on access to health informatics via a mobile phone-based intervention. Int J Med Inform. 2012; 81(9):637–48.
Article
26. Kim HS, Lee KH, Kim H, Kim JH. Using mobile phones in healthcare management for the elderly. Maturitas. 2014; 79(4):381–8.
Article
27. Majumder S, Aghayi E, Noferesti M, Memarzadeh-Tehran H, Mondal T, Pang Z, et al. Smart homes for elderly healthcare-recent advances and research challenges. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(11):2496.
Article
28. Zhao X, Wang L, Ge C, Zhen X, Chen Z, Wang J, et al. Smartphone application training program improves smartphone usage competency and quality of life among the elderly in an elder university in China: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Inform. 2020; 133:104010.
Article
29. Xie B. Improving older adults’ e-health literacy through computer training using NIH online resources. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2012; 34(1):63–71.
Article
30. Currie M, Philip LJ, Roberts A. Attitudes towards the use and acceptance of eHealth technologies: a case study of older adults living with chronic pain and implications for rural healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:162.
Article