Korean Med Educ Rev.  2021 Feb;23(1):56-67. 10.17496/kmer.2021.23.1.56.

Adapting  an  Integrated  Program  Evaluation  for  Promoting  Competency‐Based  Medical  Education

• Ju H
• Oh M
• Lee JT
• Yoon BY

• KMID: 2513509
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2021.23.1.56

Abstract

Educational program evaluation can improve the quality of the curriculum, instructional methods, and resources and provide useful data for making educational decisions and policies. Developing and implementing a program evaluation system is essential in competency-based medical education. The purpose of this study was to explore and establish an educational program evaluation system adapting an integrated program evaluation model to promote competency-based medical education. First, an Educational Evaluation Committee was organized, consisting of faculty, staff members, and students. The committee established an integrated program evaluation model, combining Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model of a process-oriented approach and Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of an outcome-oriented approach. Kirkpatrick’s model was applied to the product evaluation of the CIPP model. The committee then developed evaluation criteria, indicators, and data collection methods according to the components of the CIPP model and the four levels (reaction, learning, behavior, and results) of Kirkpatrick’s model, and collected and analyzed data. Finally, the committee reported the results of evaluation to a Medical Education Quality Improvement Committee, and the results were used to improve the curriculum and student selection. To enhance the quality of education, identifying educational deficiencies and developing various elements of education in a balanced way through educational evaluation will be needed. Furthermore, it will be necessary to listen to opinions of various stakeholders, work with all members involved in education, and communicate with decision-makers in the process of educational evaluation.

Keyword

Competency-based education; Integrated evaluation model; Program evaluation