Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 Feb;25(1):8-17. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.8.

Robotic major liver resections: Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections

• Yang HY
• Rho SY
• Han DH
• Choi JS
• Choi GH

• KMID: 2513170
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.8

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Laparoscopic major liver resections are still considered innovative procedures despite the recent development of laparoscopic liver surgery. Robotic surgery has been introduced as an innovative system for laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we investigated surgical outcomes after major liver resections using robotic systems.
Methods
From January 2009 to October 2018, 70 patients underwent robotic major liver resections, which included conventional major liver resections and right sectionectomy. The short-term and long-term outcomes were compared with 252 open major resections performed during the same period.
Results
Operative time was longer in the robotic group (472 min vs. 349 min, p＜0.001). However, estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group compared with the open resection group (269 ml vs. 548 ml,p=0.009). The overall postoperative complication rate of the robotic group was lower than that of the open resection group (31.4% vs. 58.3%, p＜0.001), but the major complication rate was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group (9.5 days vs. 15.1 days, p=0.006). Among patients with HCC, cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal liver metastasis, there was no difference in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. After propensity score matching in 37 patients with HCC for each group, the robotic group still showed a shorter hospital stay and comparable long-term outcomes.
Conclusions
Robotic major liver resections provided improved perioperative outcomes and comparable long-term oncologic outcome compared with open resections. Therefore, robotic surgery should be considered one of the options for minimally invasive major liver resections.

Keyword

Robotic hepatectomy; Open hepatectomy; Major liver resection; Surgical outcomes

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Survival analysis between open and robot resection groups regarding hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) Overall survival analysis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (p=0.22, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 100%, 93% and 93%/open case: 93%, 85% and 81%). (B) Disease-free survival analysis in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma (p=0.16, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 100%, 93% and 93%/open case: 88%, 82% and 82%).

• 

  Fig. 2 Survival analysis between open and robot resection group regarding liver metastasis. (A) Overall survival analysis in patients with liver metastasis (p=0.73, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 87%, 87% and 87%/open case: 96%, 80% and 80%). (B) Disease-free survival analysis in patients with liver metastasis (p=0.57, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 85%, 85% and 85%/open caser: 89%, 74% and none in 5 year).

• 

  Fig. 3 Survival analysis between open and robot resection groups regarding cholangiocellular carcinoma. (A) Overall survival analysis in patients with Cholangiocellular carcinoma (p=0.38 the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 100%, 100% and 100%/open case: 86%, 70% and 62%). (B) Disease-free survival analysis in patients with Cholangiocellular carcinoma (p=0.49 the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 100%, 100% and 75%/open case: 74%, 70% and 56%).

• 

  Fig. 4 Survival analysis between open and robot resection groups regarding hepatocellular carcinoma after propensity score matching. (A) Overall survival analysis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after PSM (p=0.59, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 97%, 90% and 90%/open case: 94%, 84% and 76%). (B) Disease-free survival analysis in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma after PSM (p=0.58, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of robotic case: 97%, 90% and 90%/open case: 88%, 82% and 82%).

Reference

1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. 2009; World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 250:831–841. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df. PMID: 19801936.

2. Antoniou SA, Andreou A, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Köhler G, Luketina RR, et al. 2015; Volume and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery: assessment over a 10-year period. Am J Surg. 210:922–929. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.022. PMID: 26257155.

3. Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K, Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW, Primrose JN, et al. 2011; Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 13:295–308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00295.x. PMID: 21492329. PMCID: PMC3093641.

4. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. 2015; Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 261:619–629. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184. PMID: 25742461.

5. Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Ceribelli C, Spaziani A. 2011; Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc. 25:3815–3824. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1796-9. PMID: 21656067.

6. Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Choi JS, et al. 2012; Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc. 26:2247–2258. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2168-9. PMID: 22311301.

7. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, et al. 2011; Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 149:29–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002. PMID: 20570305.

8. Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, et al. 2014; Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 259:549–555. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250. PMID: 24045442.

9. Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F, et al. 2014; Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc. 28:2973–2979. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3560-4. PMID: 24853851.

10. Chen PD, Hu RH, Liang JT, Huang CS, Wu YM. 2019; Toward a fully robotic surgery: performing robotic major liver resection with no table-side surgeon. Int J Med Robot. 15:e1985. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1985. PMID: 30659758.

11. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Ahn KS. 2010; Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc. 24:1630–1637. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0823-6. PMID: 20035349.

12. Hwang DW, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Kwon Y, Kim JH, et al. 2013; Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 20:125–130. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-012-0555-1. PMID: 23001191.

13. Navarro JG, Yang SJ, Kang I, Choi GH, Han DH, Kim KS, et al. 2020; What are the most important predictive factors for clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure after right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma? Ann Surg Treat Res. 98:62–71. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.2.62. PMID: 32051814. PMCID: PMC7002877.

14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. 2004; Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PMID: 15273542. PMCID: PMC1360123.

15. Choi GH, Chong JU, Han DH, Choi JS, Lee WJ. 2017; Robotic hepatectomy: the Korean experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 6:230–238. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.14. PMID: 28848745. PMCID: PMC5554764.

16. Navarro J, Rho SY, Kang I, Choi GH, Min BS. 2019; Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 404:895–908. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01833-7. PMID: 31797029.

17. Chiow AKH, Rho SY, Wee IJY, Lee LS, Choi GH. 2020; Robotic ICG guided anatomical liver resection in a multi-centre cohort: an evolution from "positive staining" into "negative staining" method. HPB (Oxford). doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005. [in press]. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005.

18. Wang ZY, Chen QL, Sun LL, He SP, Luo XF, Huang LS, et al. 2019; Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies. BMC Cancer. 19:1047. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6240-x. PMID: 31694596. PMCID: PMC6833163.

19. Guro H, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi Y, Kim S, et al. 2018; Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol. 27:31–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.006. PMID: 29549901.

20. Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Glazer ES, Deneve JL, Dong L, Wan JY, et al. 2017; Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. HPB (Oxford). 19:957–965. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.012. PMID: 28760630.

21. Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J, et al. 2020; Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc. 34:2000–2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06976-8. PMID: 31312961.

22. Laurence JM, Lam VW, Langcake ME, Hollands MJ, Crawford MD, Pleass HC. 2007; Laparoscopic hepatectomy, a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 77:948–953. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04288.x. PMID: 17931255.

23. Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Kostakis ID, Machairas N. 2017; Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Updates Surg. 69:291–311. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0421-4. PMID: 28220382.

24. Wabitsch S, Kästner A, Haber PK, Benzing C, Krenzien F, Andreou A, et al. 2019; Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for benign tumors and lesions: a case matched study with propensity score matching. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29:1518–1525. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0427. PMID: 31670608.

25. Zheng H, Huang SG, Qin SM, Xiang F. 2019; Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc. 33:3910–3918. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07071-8. PMID: 31451921.

26. Han DH, Choi SH, Park EJ, Kang DR, Choi GH, Choi JS. 2016; Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection. Int J Med Robot. 12:735–742. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1714. PMID: 26537176.

27. Magistri P, Tarantino G, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, et al. 2019; Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 15:e2004. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2004. PMID: 31039281.

28. Wang WH, Kuo KK, Wang SN, Lee KT. 2018; Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery. Surg Endosc. 32:3918–3924. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6131-2. PMID: 29488090.

29. Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G. 2014; Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 21:3–10. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.34. PMID: 24115394.

30. Lai EC, Tang CN. 2016; Long-term survival analysis of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 26:162–166. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000254. PMID: 27031650.

31. Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Chou WH, Lai HS, Liang JT, et al. 2017; Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 24:1021–1028. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9. PMID: 27778128.