Nutr Res Pract.  2021 Feb;15(1):122-135. 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.122.

Consumer acceptance of edible insect foods: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior

• Bae Y
• Choi J

• KMID: 2511668
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.122

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to measure consumer acceptance of edible insect foods (EIFs) while applying the extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB). Insects as food have attracted interest as potential possible sources of nutrition for the future. This study investigated consumers' perception toward insect food and future purchase behaviors.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
A survey was conducted among citizens of Korea. About two thirds of respondents had tried an EIF previously, and the mean value for food neophobia was 3.1 on a 5-point Likert scale. Respondents were divided into 2 groups of those experienced with EIFs and those not and by level of food neophobia. An independent t-test, multiple regression and descriptive analyses were conducted on the data.
RESULTS
The primary reason for not eating EIFs was that their insect form induced disgust. Comparisons of ETPB attributes by experience with EIFs showed significant differences between groups for food neophobia, subjective norm, attitude, and behavioral intention.In addition, significant differences were found for subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, attitude, and behavioral intention between 2 neophobia groups. Finally, the results of measuring the relationships between ETPB attributes and behavioral intention showed only subjective norm and attitude affected behavioral intention.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that enhanced subjective norms producing a publicly accepted EIFs environment would help encourage the purchase of EIFs. The results of this study can help the development of EIF products for future food markets.

Keyword

Insect; food; consumer behavior

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Proposed study model.FN, food neophobia; EX, experience; SN, subjective norm; PBC, perceived behavioral control; ATT, attitude; BI, behavioral intention.

Reference

1. Verkerk MC, Tramper J, van Trijp JC, Martens DE. Insect cells for human food. Biotechnol Adv. 2007; 25:198–202. PMID: 17197149.

2. Harris M. Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. New York: Waveland Press;1998.

3. LaMotte S. The food that can feed and maybe save, the planet: bugs [Internet]. Atlanta: CNN;2019. cited 2020 April 22. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/25/health/insects-feed-save-planet-wellness/index.html.

4. Piha S, Pohjanheimo T, Lähteenmäki-Uutela A, Křečková Z, Otterbring T. The effects of consumer knowledge on the willingness to buy insect food: an exploratory cross-regional study in Northern and Central Europe. Food Qual Prefer. 2018; 70:1–10.

5. Tabassum-Abbasi , Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Reducing the global environmental impact of livestock production: the mini livestock option. J Clean Prod. 2016; 112:1754–1766.

6. Bukkens S. The nutritional value of edible insects. Ecol Food Nutr. 1997; 36:287–319.

7. Schwartz GE, Weinberger DA, Singer JA. Cardiovascular differentiation of happiness, sadness, anger, and fear following imagery and exercise. Psychosom Med. 1981; 43:343–364. PMID: 7280162.

8. Pliner P, Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 1992; 19:105–120. PMID: 1489209.

9. Pliner P, Pelchat M, Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite. 1993; 20:111–123. PMID: 8507067.

10. Jaeger SR, Rasmussen MA, Prescott J. Relationships between food neophobia and food intake and preferences: findings from a sample of New Zealand adults. Appetite. 2017; 116:410–422. PMID: 28533158.

11. Tuorila H, Lahteenmaki L, Pohjalainen L, Lotti L. Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Qual Prefer. 2001; 12:29–37.

12. Tan HS, Fischer AR, Van Trijp HC, Stieger M. Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Qual Prefer. 2016; 48:293–302.

13. Hartmann C, Siegrist M. Becoming an insectivore: results of an experiment. Food Qual Prefer. 2016; 51:118–122.

14. Choe JY, Cho MS. Food neophobia and willingness to try non-traditional food for Koreans. Food Qual Prefer. 2011; 22:671–677.

15. Verbeke W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual Prefer. 2015; 39:147–155.

16. Wu K, Raab C, Chang W, Krishen A. Understanding Chinese tourists' food consumption in the United States. J Bus Res. 2016; 69:4706–4713.

17. Chen M. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Qual Prefer. 2007; 18:1008–1021.

18. Meiselman HL, King SC, Gillette M. The demographics of neophobia in a large commercial US sample. Food Qual Prefer. 2010; 21:893–897.

19. Pliner P, Pelchat ML. Neophobia in humans and the special status of foods of animal origin. Appetite. 1991; 16:205–218. PMID: 1883248.

20. Hursti UkK , Sjödén P. Food and general neophobia and their relationship with self-reported food choice: familial resemblance in Swedish families with children of ages 7–17 years. Appetite. 1997; 29:89–103. PMID: 9268428.

21. Nicklaus S. The role of food experiences during early childhood in food pleasure learning. Appetite. 2016; 104:3–9. PMID: 26298009.

22. Schwartz C, Scholtens P, Lalanne A, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite. 2011; 157:796–807.

23. Nicklaus S, Demonteil L, Tournier C. Modifying the texture of foods for infants and young children. In : Chen J, Rosenthal A, editors. Modifying Food Texture, Volume 2: Sensory Analysis, Consumer Requirements and Preferences. London: Woodhead;2015. p. 187–222.

24. Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D'Udine B, Foley RA, et al. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature. 2004; 430:419–421. PMID: 15269759.

25. Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, Halford JC. Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: a review. Appetite. 2007; 50:181–193. PMID: 17997196.

26. Kallas Z, Vitale M, Gil JM. Health innovation in patty products. The role of food neophobia in consumers' non-hypothetical willingness to pay, purchase intention and hedonic evaluation. Nutrients. 2019; 11:E444. PMID: 30791660.

27. Korsmeyer C, Sutton D. The sensory experience of food. Food Cult Soc. 2011; 14:461–475.

28. Dacremont C, Sester C. Context in food behavior and product experience – a review. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2019; 27:115–122.

29. Rotter JB. Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975; 43:56–67.

30. Norman P, Brain K. An application of an extended health belief model to the prediction of breast self-examination among women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Health Psychol. 2005; 10:1–16. PMID: 15826330.

31. Russell CA, Buhrau D. The role of television viewing and direct experience in predicting adolescents' beliefs about the health risks of fast-food consumption. Appetite. 2015; 92:200–206. PMID: 26009205.

32. Garber LL Jr, Hyatt EM, Starr RG Jr. Measuring consumer response to food products. Food Qual Prefer. 2003; 14:3–15.

33. Fallon AE, Rozin P. The psychological bases of food rejections by humans. Ecol Food Nutr. 1983; 13:15–26.

34. Gere A, Székely G, Kovács S, Kókai Z, Sipos L. Readiness to adopt insects in Hungary: a case study. Food Qual Prefer. 2017; 59:81–86.

35. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall;1980.

36. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50:179–211.

37. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1986; 22:453–474.

38. Batra R, Ahtola OT. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Mark Lett. 1991; 2:159–170.

39. Fazio RH, Chen JM, McDonel EC, Sherman SJ. Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency and the strength of the object-evaluation association. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1982; 18:339–357.

40. Brunsø K, Scholderer J, Grunert KG. Closing the gap between values and behavior - a means-end theory of lifestyle. J Bus Res. 2004; 57:665–670.

41. Shin YH, Hancer M. The role of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm in the intention to purchase local food products. J Foodserv Bus Res. 2016; 19:338–351.

42. Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students' intention to purchase organic food. J Clean Prod. 2015; 107:342–352.

43. Mirkarimi K, Eri M, Ghanbari MR, Kabir MJ, Raeisi M, Ozouni-Davaji RB, Aryaie M, Charkazi A. Modifying attitude and intention toward regular physical activity using protection motivation theory: a randomized controlled trial. East Mediterr Health J. 2017; 23:543–550. PMID: 29105045.

44. Qamar Z, McIntosh A, Hicks K. Improved perceived behavioral control in choosing fruits and vegetables as a result of the online nutrition program for South Asians. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117:A58.

45. Chen M. Modeling an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict intention to take precautions to avoid consuming food with additives. Food Qual Prefer. 2017; 58:24–33.

46. Arvola A, Vassallo M, Dean M, Lampila P, Saba A, Lähteenmäki L, Shepherd R. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 2008; 50:443–454. PMID: 18036702.

47. Menozzi G, Sogari C, Mora D. Explaining vegetable consumption among young adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Nutrients. 2015; 7:7633–7650. PMID: 26378570.

48. McNeil K, Kelly F, McNeil J. Testing Research Hypotheses Using Multiple Linear Regression. Carbondale: South Illinois University Press;1975.

49. Nusair K, Hua N. Comparative assessment of structural equation modeling and multiple regression research methodologies: E-commerce context. Tour Manage. 2010; 31:314–324.

50. Shaw D, Shiu E. Ethics in consumer choice: a multivariate modelling approach. Eur J Mark. 2003; 37:1485–1498.