J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Jan;36(4):e36. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e36.

Social Media for Scholarly Communication in Central Asia and Its Neighbouring Countries

Affiliations
  • 1Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • 2Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The current digital era has led to a surge in the use of Social Media in academia. Worldwide connectivity has brought to the fore a scarce participation of Central Asia and adjoining regions in scientific discussions. Global perspectives in science may not be recorded due to such communication disparities. An equal representation of all ethnic groups is essential to have a rounded picture of the topic at hand. The extent of use of social media platforms in various regions is determined by social, economic, religious, political, cultural and ethnic factors, which may limit participation. The paper aims to examine the use of social media by academicians in the Central Asian countries, China and Mongolia. It also focusses on the linguistic skills of the Central Asian, Chinese and Mongolian population and their eagerness to be involved in global discussions. Understanding the factors limiting participation from specific regions is the first step in this direction.

Keyword

Social Media; Language; Internet Access; Central Asia; Access to Information

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Platforms with prohibited usage in the region. Disclaimer: The information in these figures is subject to change based on internet access and changing Government policies.

  • Fig. 2 Population user base for Internet usage, and the preferred social media platforms in Central Asia and adjoining regions. Disclaimer: The information in these figures is subject to change based on internet access and changing Government policies.


Cited by  2 articles

Top Central Asian Educational Institutions on Publons: Analysis of Researchers and Reviewers
Sakir Ahmed, Prajna Anirvan
J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(21):e144.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e144.

Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis
Sakir Ahmed, Marlen Yessirkepov
J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(25):e169.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e169.


Reference

1. León LF. Architectures of the information age. J Cult Econ. 2017; 10(2):217–222.
2. Olson KE, O'Brien MA, Rogers WA, Charness N. Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing Int. 2011; 36(1):123–145. PMID: 22685360.
Article
3. Vandewater EA, Lee SJ. Measuring children's media use in the digital age: issues and challenges. Am Behav Sci. 2009; 52(8):1152–1176. PMID: 19763246.
4. Kim P, Hagashi T, Carillo L, Gonzales I, Makany T, Lee B, et al. Socioeconomic strata, mobile technology, and education: a comparative analysis. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2011; 59(4):465–486.
Article
5. Ahmed S, Gupta L. Perception about social media use by rheumatology journals: survey among the attendees of IRACON 2019. Indian J Rheumatol. 2020; 15(3):171–174.
Article
6. Mishaal DA, Abu-Shanab E. The effect of using social media in governments: framework of communication success. In : The 7th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT 2015); 2015 May 12–15; Amman, Jordan. Amman: Alzaytoonah University;2015.
7. Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Zimba O, Misra DP. Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(12):2023–2030. PMID: 33048199.
Article
8. Goel A, Gupta L. Social media in the times of COVID-19. J Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 26(6):220–223. PMID: 32852927.
Article
9. Davalbhakta S, Advani S, Kumar S, Agarwal V, Bhoyar S, Fedirko E, et al. A systematic review of smartphone applications available for corona virus disease 2019 (COVID19) and the assessment of their quality using the mobile application rating scale (MARS). J Med Syst. 2020; 44(9):164. PMID: 32779002.
Article
10. Singh P, Dwivedi YK, Kahlon KS, Sawhney RS, Alalwan AA, Rana NP. Smart monitoring and controlling of government policies using social media and cloud computing. Inf Syst Front. 2020; 22:315–337.
Article
11. Allcott H, Gentzkow M, Yu C.Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Res Polit. 2019; 6(2):
Article
12. Radcliffe D, Abuhmaid H. Social media in the Middle East: 2019 in review. SSRN. Forthcoming. 2020; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3517916.
Article
13. Dini AA, Sæbø Ø. The current state of social media research for eParticipation in developing countries: a literature review. In : 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); 2016 January 5–8; Koloa, HI, USA. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa;2016.
14. Aminov K, Jensen V, Juraev S, Overland I, Tyan D, Uulu Y. Language use and language policy in Central Asia. Cent Asia Reg Data Rev. 2010; 2(1):
15. Yaman I. Digital divide within the context of language and foreign language teaching. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015; 176:766–771.
Article
16. Ahmed S, Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19. Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 39(11):3215–3222. PMID: 32939569.
Article
17. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Kwasny M, Holmes KL. Academic information on Twitter: a user survey. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197265. PMID: 29771947.
Article
18. Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017; 68(9):2037–2062.
Article
19. Collins K, Shiffman D, Rock J. How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0162680. PMID: 27732598.
Article
20. Joinson AN. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? motives and use of Facebook. In : The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08); 2008 April; Florence, Italy. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery;2008.
21. Knight CG, Kaye LK. ‘To tweet or not to tweet?’ A comparison of academics' and students' usage of Twitter in academic contexts. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2016; 53(2):145–155.
Article
22. Varady NH, Chandawarkar AA, Kernkamp WA, Gans I. Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop. 2019; 10(9):327–338. PMID: 31572669.
Article
23. Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4):e123. PMID: 22173204.
Article
24. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010; 376(9748):1261–1271. PMID: 20933263.
Article
25. Ahmed S, Gupta L. Social media for medical journals. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2020; 1(1):26–32.
Article
26. Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(4):289–291. PMID: 21793742.
Article
27. Haldule S, Davalbhakta S, Agarwal V, Gupta L, Agarwal V. Post-publication promotion in rheumatology: a survey focusing on social media. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(11):1865–1872. PMID: 32920728.
Article
28. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. Comprehensive approach to open access publishing: platforms and tools. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(27):e184. PMID: 31293109.
Article
29. Mašić I, Begić E, Donev DM, Gajović S, Gasparyan AY, Jakovljević M, et al. Sarajevo declaration on integrity and visibility of scholarly publications. Croat Med J. 2016; 57(6):527–529. PMID: 28051276.
Article
30. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). Statistical report on internet development in China (August 2019). Updated 2019. Accessed October 24, 2020. https://cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/201911/P020191112539794960687.pdf.
31. Asur S, Yu L, Huberman BA. What trends in Chinese social media. SSRN. Forthcoming. 2011; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1888779.
Article
32. He X, Pedraza-Jimenez R. Chinese social media strategies: communication key features from a business perspective. Prof Inf. 2015; 24(2):200–209.
Article
33. Qiao H, Shih P. Use of social media for academic purpose in China. In : The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18); 2018 Apr 21–26; Montreal, Canada. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery;2018.
34. Wang X, Deng Y, Lü X, Zhang X, Yang L. The usage of WeChat to promote academic publishing in China: a case study on Chinese Laser Press. Learn Publ. 2020; 33(2):187–191.
Article
35. Liu L, Wei K, Zhang X, Wen D, Gao L, Lei J. The current status and a new approach for Chinese doctors to obtain medical knowledge using social media: a study of WeChat. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2018; 2018:2329876.
Article
36. Bohl B. Social media usage among university students in China. Occam's Razor. 2015; 5(1):5.
37. Yang H, Chen Y, Zheng L, Xu X, Cao X. Analysis of internet use behaviors among clinical medical students in China. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14(1):67. PMID: 24690437.
Article
38. Long X, Qi L, Ou Z, Zu X, Cao Z, Zeng X, et al. Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: opportunity or challenge? PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0181895. PMID: 28753632.
Article
39. Zhou H, Zhang J, Su J. Internet access, usage and trust among medical professionals in China: a web-based survey. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020; 7(Suppl 1):S38–S45. PMID: 32995378.
Article
40. King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2017; 111(3):484–501.
Article
41. Moore M. Internet penetration rate in Mongolia from 2009 to 2018. Updated 2020. Accessed October 26, 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/767547/internet-penetration-rate-mongolia/.
42. Marav D. Mongolian students' digital literacy practices: The interface between English and the Internet. Trab Linguist Apl. 2016; 55(2):293–318.
Article
43. Bold U, Yadamsuren B. Use of social media as an educational tool: perspectives of Mongolian university educators. In : The 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety '19); 2019 July 19–21; Toronto, Canada. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery;2019.
44. Callen JL, Buyankhishig B, McIntosh JH. Clinical information sources used by hospital doctors in Mongolia. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77(4):249–255. PMID: 17646126.
Article
45. Dovchin S. The role of English in the language practices of Mongolian Facebook users: English meets Mongolian on social media. Engl Today. 2017; 33(2):16–24.
46. Ghashghai E, Rosalind L. Issues Affecting Internet Use in Afghanistan and Developing Countries in the Middle East. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation;2002.
47. Mushtaq AJ. The effects of social media on the undergraduate students' academic performance. Libr Philos Pract. 2018; 1779.
48. Roblyer MD, McDaniel M, Webb M, Herman J, Witty JV. Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet High Educ. 2010; 13(3):134–140.
Article
49. Miri MA. The impact of English language in Afghanistan: an autoethnography. Int J TESOL Learn. 2019; 8(1):
50. Honari A.Online social research in Iran: a need to offer a bigger picture. Cyber Orient. 2015; 9(2):6–32.
Article
51. Hajin M. Seeking personal autonomy through the use of Facebook in Iran. SAGE Open. 2013; 3(1):
Article
52. Erfanian M, Javadinia SA, Abedini M, Bijari B. Iranian students and social networking sites: prevalence and pattern of usage. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 83:44–46.
Article
53. Iran Media Program. Liking Facebook in Tehran: Social Networking in Iran. place unknown: Iran Media Program;2014.
54. Afarani ES, Shahzeidi M, Chang Y, Park MC. Motivations, concerns, and strategies of Facebook users in Iran. In : CPRsouth8/CPRafrica2013 Conference; 2013 September 5; Mysore, India. Rochester, NY: SSRN;2013.
55. Rassouli A, Osam N. English language education throughout islamic republic reign in Iran: government policies and people's attitudes. SAGE Open. 2019; 9(2):
Article
56. Anceschi L. The persistence of media control under consolidated authoritarianism: containing Kazakhstan's digital media. Demokratizatsiya. 2015; 23(3):277–295.
57. Laruelle M, Royce D, Beyssembayev S. Untangling the puzzle of “Russia's influence” in Kazakhstan. Eurasian Geogr Econ. 2019; 60(2):211–243.
Article
58. Sharman A. A new paradigm of primary health care in Kazakhstan: personalized, community-based, standardized, and technology-driven. Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2014; 3(1):186. PMID: 29755891.
Article
59. Akynova D, Zharkynbekova S, Agmanova A, Aimoldina A, Dalbergenova L. Language choice among the youth of Kazakhstan: English as a self-representation of prestige. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 143:228–232.
Article
60. Adambekov S, Askarova S, Welburn SC, Goughnour SL, Konishi A, LaPorte R, et al. Publication productivity in Central Asia and countries of the former Soviet Union. Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2016; 5(1):261. PMID: 29138734.
Article
61. Yessirkepov M, Nurmashev B, Anartayeva M. A Scopus-based analysis of publication activity in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2015: positive trends, concerns, and possible solutions. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30(12):1915–1919. PMID: 26713071.
Article
62. Reyaz M. Cyberspace in the post-Soviet states: assessing the role of new media in Central Asia. Jadavpur J Int Relat. 2020; 24(1):7–27.
Article
63. Junisbai B, Junisbai A, Fry NY. Mass media consumption in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan: the view from below. Demokratizatsiya. 2015; 23(3):233–256.
64. Zhorobekova Z, Muhametjanova G, Ismai̇lova R. Social networks usage among youth in the Kyrgyz Republic. MANAS J Eng. 2017; 5(2):45–56.
65. Biibosunov B, Biibosunova S, Kozhonov M. Development of digital platform for social media creating in the Kyrgyz Republic. In : The 3rd International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing (ICVISP 2019); 2019 August; Vancouver, Canada. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery;2019.
66. Muhametjanova G, Ismailova R. Students' level of readiness to use social media as educational tool in Kyrgyz Republic. J Educ Multimedia Hypermedia. 2019; 28(3):331–352.
67. Asia Marketing Research, Internet Usage, Population Statistics and Facebook Subscribers. Updated 2020. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm.
68. Nagzibekova M. Language and education policies in Tajikistan. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2008; 11(3-4):501–508.
Article
69. Khudoikulova N. Linguistic situation in Tajikistan: language use in public space. Russ J Commun. 2015; 7(2):164–178.
Article
70. Shafiev A, Miles M. Friends, foes, and Facebook: blocking the Internet in Tajikistan. Demokratizatsiya. 2015; 23(3):297–320.
71. Yazliyeva O. Dynamics of the media system in post-Soviet Turkmenistan. . J Natl Mem Lang Polit. 2020; 14(1):92–110.
Article
72. StatCounter. Social media stats Turkmenistan. Updated 2020. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/turkmenistan.
73. Laruelle M. National narrative, ethnology, and academia in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. J Eurasian Stud. 2010; 1(2):102–110.
Article
74. Khairi A. Linguistic revivalism and national identity in Uzbekistan. Int Stud. 2016; 53(3-4):258–272.
Article
75. Freedman E, Shafer R. Advancing a comprehensive research agenda for Central Asian mass media. Media Asia. 2012; 39(3):119–126.
Article
76. Kafi M, Khoshsaligheh M, Hashemi MR. Translation profession in Iran: current challenges and future prospects. The Translator. 2018; 24(1):89–103.
Article
77. Teh H, Ng YS, Foo C. The efficacy of machine translation tools in the translation of technical and non-technical texts: perceptions of undergraduate student users. Langlit. 2016; 3(2):1–13.
78. de Vries E, Schoonvelde M, Schumacher G. No longer lost in translation: evidence that Google Translate works for comparative bag-of-words text applications. Polit Anal. 2018; 26(4):417–430.
Article
79. Ghasemi H, Hashemian M. A comparative study of Google Translate translations: an error analysis of English-to-Persian and Persian-to-English translations. Engl Lang Teach. 2016; 9(3):13.
Article
80. Peko S, Meyer H, Myssayeva K. You can't censor live: technology acceptance drives Central Asian journalists to mobile and helps them overcome press restrictions. Media Asia. 2019; 46(3-4):63–77.
Article
81. Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(2):183–190. PMID: 31863133.
Article
82. Imamova N. Social media and online public debate in Central Asia: a journalist's perspective. Demokratizatsiya. 2015; 23(3):359–376.
83. Chung JE. Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients. J Health Commun. 2014; 19(6):639–659. PMID: 23557148.
Article
84. Morowatisharifabad MA, Gerayllo S, Karimiankakolaki Z, Dehghan A, Salehabadi HS, Fallahzadeh H. Determinants of self-care behaviors in patients with knee osteoarthritis based on the theory of planned behavior in Iran. Indian J Rheumatol. 2020; 15(3):201–206.
Article
85. Gupta L, Goel A. COVID-19 at the intersections of science, morality and practice - reflections of the physician's soul. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2020; 50(3):274–276. PMID: 32936101.
Article
86. Naveen R, Sundaram TG, Agarwal V, Gupta L. Teleconsultation experience with the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 1–10.
Article
87. Gupta L, Lilleker JB, Agarwal V, Chinoy H, Aggarwal R. COVID-19 and myositis - unique challenges for patients. Rheumatology. 2020; keaa610. PMID: 33175137.
Article
88. Gupta L, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Balan S, Agarwal V. Response to: ‘Telerheumatology in COVID-19 era: a study from a psoriatic arthritis cohort’ by Costa et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; annrheumdis-2020-217953.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr