J Korean Med Sci.  2025 Feb;40(4):e83. 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e83.

Cartoons in Scholarly Publishing: Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

• Benlidayi IC

• KMID: 2564233
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e83

Abstract

Cartoons in scholarly publishing are effective ways to improve communication and engagement. They can transform scientific concepts into visually interesting and easyto-understand formats, thereby helping the concepts reach to larger groups more easily. Depending on the type of cartoons (concept cartoons, humor illustrations, and editorial cartoons), benefits may vary. It is recommended to maintain relevance, elegance, and quality in cartoon presentations. Potential insults must be carefully avoided to maintain respectful communication. The objectives of the current article were to examine the complex roles of cartoons in scholarly publishing, to provide recommendations for drawing scientific cartoons, and to discuss challenges in incorporating cartoons into scientific publishing.

Keyword

Caricature; Cartoon; Medical Writing; Scholarly Communication

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 A cartoonist who experiences “some challenges” while drawing her piece.

Reference

1. Siong L, Tyug O, Phang F, Pusppanathan J. The use of concept cartoons in overcoming the misconception in electricity concepts. Particip Educ Res. 2023; 10(1):310–329.

2. Coskun Benlidayi I. Diet in osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2021; 41(9):1699–1700. PMID: 31312886.

3. Gasparyan AY. Choosing the target journal: do authors need a comprehensive approach? J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28(8):1117–1119. PMID: 23960434.

4. Coskun Benlidayi I. Launching a scholarly journal. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2020; 1(1):66–68.

5. Chung BS. Illiteracy of brain-computer interface. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(43):e281. PMID: 31701702.

6. Chung BS. Correlation differs from causation. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(41):e280. PMID: 31650722.

7. Coskun Benlidayi I. Polypharmacy in geriatric rheumatology. Rheumatol Int. 2019; 39(6):1115–1116. PMID: 30810781.

8. Coskun Benlidayi I. Fibromyalgia as a challenge for patients and physicians. Rheumatol Int. 2018; 38(12):2345. PMID: 30128731.

9. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31(11):1409–1417. PMID: 21800117.

10. Balım A, Inel-Ekici D, Özcan E. Concept cartoons supported problem based learning method in middle school science classrooms. J Educ Learn. 2016; 5(2):272.

11. Yılmaz M. Impact of instruction with concept cartoons on students academic achievement in science lessons. Educ Res Rev. 2020; 15(3):95–103.

12. Serttaş S, Türkoğlu A. Diagnosing students’ misconceptions of astronomy through concept cartoons. Particip Educ Res. 2020; 7(2):164–182.

13. Siregar N, Sriyati S, Amprasto . Implementation of dialogic teaching through concept cartoon worksheets to improve high school students’ science process skills. J Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa. 2023; 9(8):5816–5826.

14. Stephenson P, Warwick P. Using concept cartoons to support progression in students’ understanding of light. Phys Educ. 2002; 37(2):135–141.

15. Pinar-Sanz MJ. Humour and intertextuality in Steve Bell’s political cartoons. Eur J Humour Res. 2020; 8(3):16–39.

16. Zurbriggen E, Sherman A. Race and gender in the 2008 U.S. presidential election: a content analysis of editorial cartoons. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2010; 10(1):223–247.

17. Weitkamp E, Milani E, Joubert M, Riedlinger M. Politicisation of science in COVID-19 editorial cartoons: a comparative study of cartoons in Australia, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Journalism Stud. 2024; 25(8):813–836.

18. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Gorin SV, Kitas GD. Educating science editors: is there a comprehensive strategy? Croat Med J. 2014; 55(6):672–675. PMID: 25559840.

19. Coskun Benlidayi I. Body image changes through aging. Anti Aging East Eur. 2023; 2(2):122–123.

20. Stead O, Liew C. Editorial cartoon collections: a review of indexing challenges. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2020; 72(3):421–438.

21. Landbeck CR. The description and indexing of editorial cartoons: an exploratory study. Updated 2013. Accessed October 20, 2024. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5469 .

22. Chen KW, Phiddian R, Stewart R. Towards a discipline of political cartoon studies: mapping the field. Milner Davis J, editor. Satire and Politics. Palgrave Studies in Comedy. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham;2017. p. 125–162.

23. Wu Y. Indexing historical political cartoons for retrieval. Updated 2013. Accessed October 20, 2024. https://repository.lsu.edu/slis_pubs/12 .

24. Johnston M, Köntges T. Increasing metadata usability for the New Zealand cartoon archive at the Alexander Turnbull Library. 2016; 26(2):91–106.

25. Gemelli E, Olmedo-Moreno E, Úbeda-Sánchez ÁM, Rodríguez-Sabiote C. Bibliometric study of scientific output between 2011 and 2020 regarding teaching-learning of the sciences through comic books. SAGE Open. 2024; 14(1):21582440231220107.

26. Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(2):183–190. PMID: 31863133.

27. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Social media platforms: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021; 59(2):68–72. PMID: 33976459.