Korean J Anesthesiol.  2020 Dec;73(6):486-502. 10.4097/kja.20354.

Anesthesia guidelines for COVID-19 patients: a narrative review and appraisal

Affiliations
  • 1Duke-NUS Medical School, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
  • 2Department of Surgical Intensive Care, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
  • 3Division of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Sciences, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
  • 4Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 5Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 6Department of Anesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged health systems globally and prompted the publication of several guidelines. The experiences of our international colleagues should be utilized to protect patients and healthcare workers. The primary aim of this article is to appraise national guidelines for the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with COVID-19 so that they can be enhanced for the management of any resurgence of the epidemic. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for guidelines related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the World Federation Society of Anesthesiologists COVID-19 resource webpage was searched for national guidelines; the search was expanded to include countries with a high incidence of SARS-CoV. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, India, Italy, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America were evaluated. All the guidelines focused predominantly on intubation and infection control. The scope and purpose of guidelines from China were the most comprehensive. The UK and South Africa provided the best clarity. Editorial independence, the rigor of development, and applicability scored poorly. Heterogeneity and gaps pertaining to preoperative screening, anesthesia technique, subspecialty anesthesia, and the lack of auditing of guidelines were identified. Evidence supporting the recommendations was weak. Early guidelines for the anesthetic management of COVID-19 patients lacked quality and a robust reporting framework. As new evidence emerges, national guidelines should be updated to enhance rigor, clarity, and applicability.

Keyword

Anesthesia; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Guidelines; Perioperative management; Perioperative medicine; Review

Cited by  1 articles

Left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction in coronavirus disease: opening Pandora’s box!
Rohan Magoon
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021;74(6):557-558.    doi: 10.4097/kja.21010.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr