J Korean Diabetes.  2020 Sep;21(3):140-148. 10.4093/jkd.2020.21.3.140.

Real World Data and Artificial Intelligence in Diabetology

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

In the modern society in which we live, digitalization, big data and artificial intelligence (AI) are widely used in finance, e-commerce, manufacturing, and logistics. This trend is no exception in healthcare, and many healthcare professionals have the expectation that digital healthcare, including AI, which produce and utilize medical big data, can help doctors to improve the quality of healthcare services. In particular, in the endocrine area to which we belong, it can be seen that it is relatively easy to conduct AI research using medical big data, i.e., real world data, which is relatively well organized compared to other diseases. Already, AI technologies for diagnosing diabetic complication or vision recognition technologies for determining diabetic retinopathy have been studied for quite a long time and are also used in clinical practice. Hence, there is no doubt that medical big data will play an essential role in healthcare, especially in endocrinology and diabetology. However, there is a need to review the clinical implications of AI research results utilizing medical big data. Medical staff should clarify the purpose of AI to leverage medical big data. In addition, healthcare professionals must understand the precautions and benefits required to use medical big data when perform AI research. Therefore, in this manuscript, some studies are being conducted using real world data in the field of diabetology, and I would like to discuss the implications of these studies and future development directions.

Keyword

Artificial intelligence; Endocrinology; Real world data

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Artificial intelligence (AI) for everything.

  • Fig. 2. Clinical decision support system (CDSS) in diabetes. CGMS, Continuous glucose monitoring system; KDA, Korean Diabetes Association; FHS, Framingham Heart study, PGHD (patient-generated health data).

  • Fig. 3. Concept of Prediction Model. EMR, electronic medical record; AI, artificial intelligence; CT, computed tomography


Reference

1. Ilcus MA. Impact of digitalization in business world. Rev Int Comp Manag. 2018; 19:350–8.
2. Gokul B. Artificial intelligence in financial services. Sansmaran Manag Res J. 2018; 8:3–5.
3. Hong N, Park H, Rhee Y. Machine learning applications in endocrinology and metabolism research: an overview. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020; 35:71–84.
Article
4. Gubbi S, Hamet P, Tremblay J, Koch CA, Hannah-Shmouni F. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in endocrinology and metabolism: the dawn of a new era. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:185.
Article
5. Abràmoff MD, Lavin PT, Birch M, Shah N, Folk JC. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digit Med. 2018; 1:39.
Article
6. Natarajan S, Jain A, Krishnan R, Rogye A, Sivaprasad S. Diagnostic accuracy of community-based diabetic ret inopathy screening w ith an offline artificial intelligence system on a smartphone. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019; 137:1182–8.
7. Kim HS, Kim DJ, Yoon KH. Medical big data is not yet available: why we need realism rather than exaggeration. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2019; 34:349–54.
Article
8. Seyhan AA, Carini C. Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care? J Transl Med. 2019; 17:114.
Article
9. Allen B. The role of the FDA in ensuring the safety and efficacy of artificial intelligence software and devices. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16:208–10.
10. Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. J Digit Imaging. 2000; 13:145–56.
Article
11. Mian Z, Hermayer KL, Jenkins A. Continuous glucose monitoring : rev iew of an innovation in diabetes management. Am J Med Sci. 2019; 358:332–9.
12. Sheth A, Jaimini U, Yip HY. How will the internet of things enable augmented personalized health? IEEE Intell Syst. 2018; 33:89–97.
Article
13. Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014; 2:3.
Article
14. Wroclawski M, Heldwein FL. Digital physician burnout in the "new normal" workplace. J Endourol;2020; doi:10.1089/end.2020.0631. [Epub ahead of print].
15. Awwalu J, Garba AG, Ghazvini A, Atuah R. Artificial intelligence in personalized medicine application of AI algorithms in solving personalized medicine problems. IJCTE. 2015; 7:439–443.
Article
16. Olaronke I, Oluwaseun O. Big data in healthcare: prospects, challenges and resolutions. Paper presented at: 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC). 2016 Dec 6-7; San Francisco (CA), USA. 1152–7.
Article
17. Beam AL, Kohane IS. Translating artificial intelligence into clinical care. JAMA. 2016; 316:2368–9.
Article
18. Musacchio N, Giancaterini A, Guaita G, Ozzello A, Pellegrini MA, Ponzani P, et al. Artificial intelligence and big data in diabetes care: a position statement of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22:e16922.
Article
19. Sahoo PK, Mohapatra SK, Wu SL. Analyzing healthcare big data with prediction for future health condition. IEEE Access. 2016; 4:9789–99.
Article
20. Hripcsak G, Duke JD, Shah NH, Reich CG, Huser V, Schuemie MJ, et al. Observational health data sciences and informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:574–8.
21. Bartlett VL, Dhruva SS, Shah ND, Ryan P, Ross JS. Feasibility of using real-world data to replicate clinical trial evidence. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2:e1912869.
Article
22. Vashisht R, Jung K, Schuler A, Banda JM, Park RW, Jin S, et al. Association of hemoglobin A1c levels with use of sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin: analysis from the observational health data sciences and informatics initiative. JAMA Netw Open. 2018; 1:e181755.
23. Hripcsak G, Ryan PB, Duke JD, Shah NH, Park RW, Huser V, et al. Characterizing treatment pathways at scale using the OHDSI network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113:7329–36.
Article
24. Callahan A, Shah NH. A second opinion from observational data on second-line diabetes drugs. JAMA Netw Open. 2018; 1:e186119.
Article
25. Klerings I, Weinhandl AS, Thaler KJ. Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing? Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015; 109:285–90.
Article
26. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes BB; CDSS Systematic Review Team. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013; 30:739–45.
Article
27. El-Sappagh S, Kwak D, Ali F, Kwak KS. DMTO: a realistic ontology for standard diabetes mellitus treatment. J Biomed Semantics. 2018; 9:8.
Article
28. Jia P, Zhao P, Chen J, Zhang M. Evaluation of clinical decision support systems for diabetes care: an overview of current evidence. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019; 25:66–77.
Article
29. Chen M, Hao Y, Hwang K, Wang L, Wang L. Disease prediction by machine learning over big data from healthcare communities. IEEE Access. 2017; 5:8869–79.
Article
30. Elhadd T, Mall R, Bashir M, Palotti J, Fernandez-Luque L, Farooq F, for PROFAST-Ramadan Study Group, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) based machine learning models predict glucose variability and hypoglycaemia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes on a multiple drug regimen who fast during ramadan (The PROFAST - IT Ramadan study). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 169:108388.
Article
31. Fagherazzi G, Ravaud P. Digital diabetes: perspectives for diabetes prevention, management and research. Diabetes Metab. 2019; 45:322–9.
Article
32. Ellahham S. Artificial intelligence: the future for diabetes care. Am J Med. 2020; 133:895–900.
Article
33. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019; 6:94–8.
Article
34. Dr ygin DS, Pronkin NN. Application of artificial intelligence in medicine. Int J Prof Sci. 2020; 1:35–8.
35. Macrae C. Governing the safety of artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28:495–8.
Article
36. Aceto G, Persico V, Pescapé A. Industry 4.0 and health: internet of things, big data, and cloud computing for Healthcare 4.0. J Ind Inf Integr. 2020; 18:100129.
37. Chen D, Liu S, Kingsbury P, Sohn S, Storlie CB, Habermann EB, et al. Deep learning and alternative learning strategies for retrospective real-world clinical data. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:43.
Article
38. Gade K, Geyik SC, Kenthapadi K, Mithal V, Taly A. Explainable AI in industry. Paper presented at: KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2019 Aug 4-8; Anchorage (AK), USA. 3203–4.
Article
39. Adadi A, Berrada M. Explainable AI for healthcare: from black box to interpretable models. Bhateja V, Satapathy SC, Satori H, editors. Embedded systems and artificial intelligence. Singapore: Springer;2020. p. 327–37.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr