Korean J Pain.  2020 Jan;33(1):60-65. 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.60.

Evaluation of the cross-sectional area of acromion process for shoulder impingement syndrome

• Joo Y
• Cho HR
• Kim YU

• KMID: 2506644
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.60

Abstract

Background
Anatomic changes in the acromion have been considered a main cause of shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). To evaluate the relationship between SIS and the acromion process, we devised a new morphological parameter called the acromion process cross-sectional area (APA). We hypothesized that the APA could be an important morphologic diagnostic parameter in SIS.
Methods
We collected APA data from 95 patients with SIS and 126 control subjects who underwent shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Then we measured the maximal cross-sectional area of the bone margin of the acromion process on MRI scans.
Results
The mean of APAs were 136.50 ± 21.75 mm² in the male control group and 202.91 ± 31.78 mm² in the male SIS group; SIS patients had significantly greater APAs (p < 0.001). The average of APAs were 105.38 ± 19.07 mm² in the female control group and 147.62 ± 22.90 mm² in the female SIS group, and the SIS patients had significantly greater APAs (p < 0.001). The optimal APA cut-off in the male group was 165.14 mm² with 90.2% sensitivity, 91.4% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.968. In the female group, the optimal cut-off was 122.50 mm² with 85.2% sensitivity, 84.9% specificity, and an AUC of 0.928.
Conclusions
The newly devised APA is a sensitive parameter for assessing SIS; greater APA is associated with a higher possibility of SIS. We think that this result will be helpful for the diagnosis of SIS.

Keyword

Acromion; Anatomy; Cross-Sectional; Diagnosis; Osteophyte; Parameter; Process; Shoulder; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Oblique coronal proton density fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in acromion sections: (A) normal control male; (B) shoulder impingement syndrome.

Reference

1. Roidis NT, Motamed S, Vaishnav S, Ebramzadeh E, Karachalios TS, Itamura JM. The influence of the acromioclavicular joint degeneration on supraspinatus outlet impingement and the acromion shape. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17:331–4. DOI: 10.1177/230949900901700318. PMID: 20065375.

2. Aydin A, Yildiz V, Kalali F, Yildirim OS, Topal M, Dostbil A. The role of acromion morphology in chronic subacromial impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011; 77:733–6. PMID: 22308616.

3. Balke M, Banerjee M, Vogler T, Akoto R, Bouillon B, Liem D. Acromial morphology in patients with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22:415–21. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2327-5. PMID: 23223878.

4. Shin KM. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Korean J Pain. 2011; 24:69–73. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.69. PMID: 21716613. PMCID: 3111562.

5. Hughes PC, Green RA, Taylor NF. Measurement of subacromial impingement of the rotator cuff. J Sci Med Sport. 2012; 15:2–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.07.001. PMID: 21856224.

6. Seeger LL, Gold RH, Bassett LW, Ellman H. Shoulder impingement syndrome: MR findings in 53 shoulders. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 150:343–7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.2.343. PMID: 3257322.

7. Balke M, Schmidt C, Dedy N, Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Liem D. Correlation of acromial morphology with impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. Acta Orthop. 2013; 84:178–83. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.773413. PMID: 23409811. PMCID: 3639339.

8. Natsis K, Tsikaras P, Totlis T, Gigis I, Skandalakis P, Appell HJ, et al. Correlation between the four types of acromion and the existence of enthesophytes: a study on 423 dried scapulas and review of the literature. Clin Anat. 2007; 20:267–72. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20320. PMID: 16683236.

9. Saha S, Vasudeva N. Morphometric evaluation of adult acromion process in North Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11:AC08–11. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21060.9312. PMID: 28273959. PMCID: 5324404.

10. Kanatli U, Gemalmaz HC, Ozturk BY, Voyvoda NK, Tokgoz N, Bolukbasi S. The role of radiological subacromial distance measurements in the subacromial impingement syndrome. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 23:317–22. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-0960-9. PMID: 23412278.

11. Li X, Xu W, Hu N, Liang X, Huang W, Jiang D, et al. Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: a three-dimensional analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0176193. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176193. PMID: 28441418. PMCID: 5404845.

12. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Galatz LM, Teefey SA. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:1699–704. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00835. PMID: 16882890.

13. Edelson JG, Taitz C. Bony anatomy of coracoacromial arch: implications for arthroscopic portal placement in the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 1993; 9:201–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80375-5. PMID: 8461082.

14. Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Cuomo F, Simon J, Rosenblum S, Katz N. The influence of coracoacromial arch anatomy on rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992; 1:4–14. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80010-4. PMID: 22958965.

15. Mansur DI, Khanal K, Haque MK, Sharma K. Morphometry of acromion process of human scapulae and its clinical importance amongst Nepalese population. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2012; 10:33–6. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v10i2.7340. PMID: 23132472.

16. Gagey N, Ravaud E, Lassau JP. Anatomy of the acromial arch: correlation of anatomy and magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 1993; 15:63–70. DOI: 10.1007/BF01629865. PMID: 8488437.

17. Kitay GS, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Haygood T, Kneeland BJ, Berlin J. Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 4:441–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80036-9. PMID: 8665289.

18. Banas MP, Miller RJ, Totterman S. Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 4:454–61. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80038-2. PMID: 8665291.

19. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Sukthankar A, Schmid MR, Gerber C. Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88:800–5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03042. PMID: 16595470.

20. Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Wurnig C, Roposch A. Shoulder impingement: relationship of clinical symptoms and imaging criteria. Clin J Sport Med. 2009; 19:83–9. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318198e2e3. PMID: 19451760.

21. Takase K, Yamamoto K. Histological and ultrastructural changes in the undersurface of the acromion with subacromial impingement. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76:386–91. DOI: 10.1080/00016470510030869. PMID: 16156467.

22. McGinley JC, Agrawal S, Biswal S. Rotator cuff tears: association with acromion angulation on MRI. Clin Imaging. 2012; 36:791–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.04.007. PMID: 23154011.

23. Michener LA, Subasi Yesilyaprak SS, Seitz AL, Timmons MK, Walsworth MK. Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23:363–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2542-8. PMID: 23736252.