Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2020 Sep;63(5):655-659. 10.5468/ogs.20046.

Congenital uterovaginal abnormalities, it’s embryogenesis, surgical management and clinical implications

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Varun Arjun Medical College and Rohilkhand Hospital, Banthara, India
  • 2Department of Anatomy, Varun Arjun Medical College and Rohilkhand Hospital, Banthara, India
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Marine Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana

Abstract


Objective
Congenital Mullerian duct malformations are a challenging group of conditions for surgeons and need surgical experience and skill. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to present the diagnosis, surgical management, and clinical implications of congenital uterovaginal abnormalities.
Methods
Between 1980 and 2015, 8 patients with congenital uterovaginal abnormalities were diagnosed. In one patient a unique case of an unusual horseshoe shaped double uterus communicating via a transverse canal along with agenesis of the cervix and vagina was noted, and utero-vaginal agenesis was diagnosed in 6 patients. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome with its female phenotype associated with bilateral testicular tissue in the inguinal canal with an accompanying absence of the ovaries, uterus, uterine tubes, vagina, and an imperforate hymen, was diagnosed in one patient. Clinical examination of all the patients revealed well-developed secondary sexual characteristics. A modified McIndoe vaginoplasty procedure was the surgical treatment common to all patients to treat vaginal agenesis. The surgery was performed by a consultant (Dr. K.G. Paul) using the standardized surgical technique.
Results
An unusual Mullerian duct anomaly, uterus bicornisacollis, was successfully corrected by uteroplasty and a new cervix was constructed. Complete vaginal agenesis was corrected by a modified McIndoe vaginoplasty technique. None of the patients had any significant post-operative complications.
Conclusion
Knowledge of congenital uterovaginal abnormalities diagnosed in this study is essential for surgeons, clinical anatomists, radiologists, and morphologists who may increase the success of their diagnostic evaluations and surgical approaches to the region.

Keyword

Androgen insensitivity syndrome; Infertility; Vaginal agenesis; Wolffian duct

Reference

References

1. Højsgaard A, Villadsen I. McIndoe procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis: complications and results. Br J Plast Surg. 1995; 48:97–102.
2. Muckle CW. Developmental abnormalities of the female reproductive organs. In : Sciarra JJ, Dooley S, Depp R, Lurain JR, Kaunitz A, editors. Gynecology and obstetrics looseleaf CD-ROM. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publisher;2001.
3. Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Congenital anomalies of the müllerian system. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51:747–55.
4. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystyren P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982; 61:157–62.
Article
5. Heinonen PK. Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril. 1997; 68:224–30.
Article
6. Simón C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56:1192–3.
Article
7. Tolhurst DE, van der Helm TW. The treatment of vaginal atresia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 172:407–14.
8. Fliegner JR. Congenital atresia of the vagina. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987; 165:387–91.
9. Salvatore CA, Lodovicci O. Vaginal agenesis: an analysis of ninety cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978; 57:89–94.
Article
10. Fore SR, Hammond CB, Parker RT, Anderson EE. Urologic and genital anomalies in patients with congenital absence of the vagina. Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 46:410–6.
11. Buss JG, Lee RA. McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: results and complications. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989; 64:758–61.
Article
12. Garcia J, Jones HW Jr. The split thickness graft technic for vaginal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 49:328–32.
13. Coulam CB, Graham ML 2nd, Spelsberg TC. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: gonadal androgen receptor activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 150:531–3.
Article
14. Rutgers JL, Scully RE. The androgen insensitivity syndrome (testicular feminization): a clinicopathologic study of 43 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1991; 10:126–44.
15. Griffin JE, Wilson JD. The syndromes of androgen resistance. N Engl J Med. 1980; 302:198–209.
Article
16. Gîngu C, Dick A, Pătrăşcoiu S, Domnişor L, Mihai M, Hârza M, et al. Testicular feminization: complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Discussions based on a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014; 55:177–81.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr