Acute Crit Care.  2020 Aug;35(3):169-178. 10.4266/acc.2020.00143.

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as a predictor of mortality in ventilated patients with multidrug-resistant bacteremia

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Abstract

Background
The occurrence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteremia in ventilated patients may be associated with a high mortality rate. We evaluated whether Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on the day of bacteremia could predict 90-day mortality in these patients.
Methods
Data were obtained retrospectively from 202 patients (male, 60.4%; median age, 64 years) hospitalized at a single university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. All adult patients who had were ventilated and had one of the following six MDR bacteremias between March 2011 and February 2018 were enrolled: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods (Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.
Results
The overall 90-day mortality rate after the day of bacteremia was 59.9%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the SOFA and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were 0.732 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.666 to 0.792; P < 0.001) and 0.662 (95% CI, 0.593 to 0.727; P < 0.001), respectively, with no difference between the two (P = 0.059). Also, the cutoff value of the SOFA score was 9 (based on Youden’s index). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that this cut-off value was significantly associated with higher mortality rate (hazard ratio, 2.886; 95% CI, 1.946 to 4.221;P < 0.001).
Conclusions
SOFA score measured on the day of bacteremia may be a useful prognostic indicator of 90-day mortality in ventilated patients with MDR bacteremia.

Keyword

bacteremia; intensive care unit; prognosis

Figure

  • Figure 1. Flowchart of recruited and enrolled study participants. ICU: intensive care unit; MDR: multidrug-resistant.

  • Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day survival after the day of bacteremia according to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score cut-off values in (A) all enrolled patients, (B) Gram-positive patients, and (C) Gram-negative patients. Differences between patients above and below the cut-offs were (A) 39.39% (P<0.001), (B) 16.53% (P<0.001), and (C) 22.69% (P<0.001) by log-rank tests.

  • Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores for predicting 90-day mortality after the day of bacteremia in (A) all enrolled patients, (B) Gram-positive patients, and (C) Gram-negative patients. (A) In all patients, the area under the ROC curves for the SOFA and APACHE II scores were 0.732 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.666–0.792; P<0.001) and 0.662 (95% CI, 0.593–0.727; P<0.001), respectively, with no difference between the two (P=0.059). (B) In patients with Gram-positive bacteremia, the AUCs for the SOFA and APACHE II scores were 0.733 (95% CI, 0.636–0.817; P<0.001) and 0.701 (95% CI, 0.601–0.788; P<0.001), respectively, with no difference between the two (P=0.572). (C) In patients with Gram-negative bacteremia, the AUCs for the SOFA and APACHE II scores were 0.720 (95% CI, 0.624–0.803; P<0.001) and 0.622 (95% CI, 0.523–0.714; P<0.001), respectively. The AUC for SOFA score was significantly higher than the AUC for APACHE II score (P=0.037).


Reference

1. Pulcini C, Defres S, Aggarwal I, Nathwani D, Davey P. Design of a ‘day 3 bundle’ to improve the reassessment of inpatient empirical antibiotic prescriptions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 61:1384–8.
Article
2. Levy-Hara G, Amábile-Cuevas CF, Gould I, Hutchinson J, Abbo L, Saxynger L, et al. “Ten commandments” for the appropriate use of antibiotics by the practicing physician in an outpatient setting. Front Microbiol. 2011; 2:230.
Article
3. Levy Hara G, Kanj SS, Pagani L, Abbo L, Endimiani A, Wertheim HF, et al. Ten key points for the appropriate use of antibiotics in hospitalised patients: a consensus from the Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance Working Groups of the International Society of Chemotherapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016; 48:239–46.
Article
4. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1198–208.
Article
5. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18:268–81.
Article
6. Brusselaers N, Vogelaers D, Blot S. The rising problem of antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 1:47.
Article
7. Kim JH, Hong SK, Kim KC, Lee MG, Lee KM, Jung SS, et al. Influence of full-time intensivist and the nurse-to-patient ratio on the implementation of severe sepsis bundles in Korean intensive care units. J Crit Care. 2012; 27:414.e11. 21.
Article
8. Kwak SH, Jeong CW, Lee SH, Lee HJ, Koh Y. Current status of intensive care units registered as critical care subspecialty training hospitals in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29:431–7.
Article
9. Lim CM, Kwak SH, Suh GY, Koh Y. Critical care in Korea: present and future. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1540–4.
Article
10. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22:707–10.
11. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315:801–10.
Article
12. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985; 13:818–29.
13. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:1301–8.
Article
14. Lockwood AM, Perez KK, Musick WL, Ikwuagwu JO, Attia E, Fasoranti OO, et al. Integrating rapid diagnostics and antimicrobial stewardship in two community hospitals improved process measures and antibiotic adjustment time. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37:425–32.
Article
15. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012; 307:2526–33.
16. Howard P, Pulcini C, Levy Hara G, West RM, Gould IM, Harbarth S, et al. An international cross-sectional survey of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 70:1245–55.
Article
17. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163:670–5.
Article
18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44:837–45.
Article
19. Chen SJ, Chao TF, Chiang MC, Kuo SC, Chen LY, Yin TL, et al. Prediction of patient outcome from Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores. Intern Med. 2011; 50:871–7.
Article
20. Saunderson RB, Gouliouris T, Nickerson EK, Cartwright EJ, Kidney A, Aliyu SH, et al. Impact of routine bedside infectious disease consultation on clinical management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21:779–85.
Article
21. Fries BL, Licitra C, Crespo A, Akhter K, Busowski MT, Salazar D, et al. Infectious diseases consultation and the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58:598–9.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr