J Korean Med Sci.  2020 Aug;35(32):e248. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e248.

Factors Related to Subjective Wellbeing in Workers Who Interact with Angry Clients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan, Korea
  • 2Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea

Abstract

Background
Among workers who interact with angry clients, there is limited information about the characteristics of workers who are most vulnerable to mental health problems. Thus, we determined the association of multiple demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable work-related psychosocial factors with the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients.
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of data from the fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey, conducted in 2017. The study focused on workers who interacted with angry clients during 25% or more of their work time. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of multiple factors with self-reported subjective well-being after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable psychosocial factors.
Results
Overall, 9.6% of men and 7.4% of women who interacted with angry clients reported poor subjective well-being. Poor well-being was significantly more likely to be reported by men who worked 40 hours or more per week (aOR, 3.97–5.37) and by men who were daily workers (aOR, 2.21). Poor subjective well-being had a significantly positive association with exposure to adverse social behaviors by clients (men: aOR, 1.54, women: aOR, 1.58), and significantly negative associations with unskilled manual work (women only: aOR, 0.30), job satisfaction (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.52), and good social climate (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.44).
Conclusion
Workers who interact with angry clients were widely distributed over nonmanual labor and manual labor, but not limited to service and sales job. We identified modifiable factors that affect the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients. We suggest that employers provide protection to prevent adverse social behaviors by clients, and also make an effort to establish a good social climate at the workplace.

Keyword

Well-being; Client; Adverse Social Behavior; Support; Job Satisfaction

Reference

1. Hochschild AR. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press;1991.
2. de Castro AB, Agnew J, Fitzgerald ST. Emotional labor: relevant theory for occupational health practice in post-industrial America. AAOHN J. 2004; 52(3):109–115. PMID: 15068101.
3. Eurofound. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey–Overview Report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union;2017.
4. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. The Fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey. Ulsan: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency;2019.
5. Kim YS, Rhee KY, Oh MJ, Park J. The validity and reliability of the second Korean working conditions survey. Saf Health Work. 2013; 4(2):111–116. PMID: 23961335.
Article
6. Statistics Korea. Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2016.
7. International Labour Office. International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labour Office;2012.
8. World Health Organization. WHO (Five) Well-Being Index. Geneva: World Health Organization;1998.
9. Park J, Han BY, Kim Y. Gender differences in occupations and complaints of musculoskeletal symptoms: representative sample of South Korean workers. Am J Ind Med. 2017; 60(4):342–349. PMID: 28262963.
Article
10. Kelly MM, Tyrka AR, Price LH, Carpenter LL. Sex differences in the use of coping strategies: predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Depress Anxiety. 2008; 25(10):839–846. PMID: 17603810.
Article
11. Virtanen M, Ferrie JE, Singh-Manoux A, Shipley MJ, Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG, et al. Long working hours and symptoms of anxiety and depression: a 5-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study. Psychol Med. 2011; 41(12):2485–2494. PMID: 21329557.
Article
12. Virtanen M, Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Ferrie JE, Kivimäki M. Overtime work as a predictor of major depressive episode: a 5-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e30719. PMID: 22295106.
Article
13. Yoon Y, Ryu J, Kim H, Kang CW, Jung-Choi K. Working hours and depressive symptoms: the role of job stress factors. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018; 30(1):46. PMID: 30009036.
Article
14. Park J, Han B, Park JS, Park EJ, Kim Y. Nonstandard workers and differential occupational safety and health vulnerabilities. Am J Ind Med. 2019; 62(8):701–715. PMID: 31218723.
Article
15. Park J, Han B, Kim Y. Association of job satisfaction and security with subjective health and well-being in Korean employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2018; 60(10):e525–32. PMID: 30095588.
Article
16. Jang SY, Jang SI, Bae HC, Shin J, Park EC. Precarious employment and new-onset severe depressive symptoms: a population-based prospective study in South Korea. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(4):329–337. PMID: 25909824.
Article
17. Kim IH, Muntaner C, Khang YH, Paek D, Cho SI. The relationship between nonstandard working and mental health in a representative sample of the South Korean population. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63(3):566–574. PMID: 16580108.
Article
18. Son MG. Women's dual burden and the characteristics of their paid work time: Focusing on dual earner couples. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2005; 28(1):277–311.
19. Choi SY, Chang KS. The material contradictions of proletarian patriarchy under condensed capitalist industrialization: The instability in the working life courses of “male breadwinners” and its familial ramifications. Korean J Sociol. 2012; 46(2):203–230.
20. Quinlan M. The Effects of Non-standard Forms of Employment on Worker Health and Safety. Geneva: International Labour Office;2015.
21. Park J, Han B, Park JS, Park EJ, Kim Y. Nonstandard workers and differential occupational safety and health vulnerabilities. Am J Ind Med. 2019; 62(8):701–715. PMID: 31218723.
Article
22. Schütte S, Chastang JF, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Niedhammer I. Social inequalities in psychological well-being: a European comparison. Community Ment Health J. 2014; 50(8):987–990. PMID: 24664367.
Article
23. Faragher EB, Cass M, Cooper CL. The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(2):105–112. PMID: 15657192.
Article
24. Hogh A, Henriksson ME, Burr H. A 5-year follow-up study of aggression at work and psychological health. Int J Behav Med. 2005; 12(4):256–265. PMID: 16262544.
Article
25. Willness CR, Steel P, Lee K. A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Person Psychol. 2007; 60(1):127–162.
Article
26. Bonafons C, Jehel L, Coroller-Béquet A. Specificity of the links between workplace harassment and PTSD: primary results using court decisions, a pilot study in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009; 82(5):663–668. PMID: 18953560.
Article
27. Min KB, Park SG, Hwang SH, Min JY. Precarious employment and the risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Prev Med. 2015; 71:72–76. PMID: 25532676.
Article
28. Robbins JM, Ford MT, Tetrick LE. Perceived unfairness and employee health: a meta-analytic integration. J Appl Psychol. 2012; 97(2):235–272. PMID: 21928872.
Article
29. Ferrie JE, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG, Kivimäki M. Injustice at work and incidence of psychiatric morbidity: the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med. 2006; 63(7):443–450. PMID: 16698805.
30. Ndjaboué R, Brisson C, Vézina M. Organisational justice and mental health: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2012; 69(10):694–700. PMID: 22693265.
31. Ogińska-Bulik N. Emotional intelligence in the workplace: exploring its effects on occupational stress and health outcomes in human service workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2005; 18(2):167–175. PMID: 16201208.
32. Holman D, Chissick C, Totterdell P. The effects of performance monitoring on emotional labor and well-being in call centers. Motiv Emot. 2002; 26(1):57–81.
33. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang D, Kim SA, Kang MG, Lee CG, et al. Developing an occupational stress scale for Korean employees. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2005; 17(4):297–317.
Article
34. Cropanzano R, Wright T. When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: a review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consult Psychol J Pract Res. 2001; 53(3):182–199.
Article
35. Diener E. Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol. 2000; 55(1):34–43. PMID: 11392863.
Article
36. Wright BA, Lopez S. Widening the diagnostic focus: a case for including human strengths and environmental resources. In : Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2002. p. 26–44.
37. Diener E, Larsen RJ. The experience of emotional well-being. In : Lewis M, Haviland JM, editors. Handbook of Emotions. New York, NY: Guilford;1993. p. 405–415.
38. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015; 84(3):167–176. PMID: 25831962.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr