J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2020 Aug;46(4):240-249. 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.4.240.

Development of a standardized mucositis and osteoradionecrosis animal model using external radiation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Pharmacology & Dental Therapeutics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Laboratory Animal Center, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
Although the side effects of radiation therapy vary from mucositis to osteomyelitis depending on the dose of radiation therapy, to date, an experimental animal model has not yet been proposed. The aim of this study was to develop an animal model for assessing complications of irradiated bone, especially to quantify the dose of radiation needed to develop a rat model.
Materials and Methods
Sixteen Sprague-Dawley rats aged seven weeks with a mean weight of 267.59 g were used. Atraumatic extraction of a right mandibular first molar was performed. At one week after the extraction, the rats were randomized into four groups and received a single dose of external radiation administered to the right lower jaw at a level of 14, 16, 18, or 20 Gy, respectively. Clinical alopecia with body weight changes were compared and bony volumetric analysis with micro-computed tomography (CT), histologic analysis with H&E were performed.
Results
The progression of the skin alopecia was different depending on the irradiation dose. Micro-CT parameters including bone volume, bone volume/tissue volume, bone mineral density, and trabecular spaces, showed no significant differences. The progression of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) along with that of inflammation, fibrosis, and bone resorption, was found with increased osteoclast or fibrosis in the radiated group. As the radiation dose increases, osteoclast numbers begin to decrease and osteoclast tends to increase. Osteoclasts respond more sensitively to the radiation dose, and osteoblasts are degraded at doses above 18 Gy.
Conclusion
A standardized animal model clinically comparable to ORN of the jaw is a valuable tool that can be used to examine the pathophysiology of the disease and trial any potential treatment modalities. We present a methodology for the use of an experimental rat model that incorporates a guideline regarding radiation dose.

Keyword

Osteoradionecrosis of jaw; External radiation therapy; Experimental animal model; Mucositis; Osteoclast

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A. Animal receiving irradiation. B. Experimental radiological setting used in this study, 260 kV, 10 mA, 2 mL Al filter. C. Specimens for evaluation after harvesting of the lower jaw including soft tissue.

  • Fig. 2 Progression of hair loss in the clinical photo. A. Control group. B. Two weeks after irradiation. C. Two weeks after irradiation (contralateral side).

  • Fig. 3 Differences in bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) (A), bone mineral densities (BMD) (B), and trabecular spaces (Tb.Sp.) (C) between radiation doses and observation period.

  • Fig. 4 Histological findings of H&E staining of the jaw bone irradiated with 16 Gy showing resorption line (A1; arrows), microabscess (A2; arrows, A3), and dead bone (C1, C2, E1, E2; arrows), with empty osteocyte lacunae (B, D, E1; arrowheads) in the defect site. A1 arrows: resorption line; A2 arrow, A3: abscess border line and abscess area; B arrowheads: empty osteocyte lacunae; C1, C2 arrows: dead bone borderline; D, E1 arrowheads: empty osteocyte lacunae; E1, E2 arrows: dead bone borderline. (A1: ×100; A2: ×200; A3, B: ×400; C1, C2: ×200 and polarized view in C2; D, E1, E2: ×1,000 and polarized view in E2)

  • Fig. 5 Histological findings of H&E staining of the jaw bone irradiated with 18 Gy showing more dead bone than that seen with 16 Gy dose and the presence of resorption with osteoclast cells. Abscesses (A1, A2; arrows, A3), inflammatory infiltrate (B1; arrows), and empty osteocyte lacunae (B2, B3; arrowheads) were observed. The close-up of the box in C1 is C2. There are numerous osteoclast cells observed in the radionecrotic lesion borderlines. A1, A2 arrows, A3: abscess and abscess borderline; B1 arrows: inflammatory cell; B2, B3 arrowheads: empty osteocyte lacunae; C1, C2 arrows: osteoclast cells; C3 arrows: internal osteoclast cells. (A1: ×100; A2: ×400, A3: ×1,000, B1: ×200, B2, B3: ×400; C1: ×200; C2, C3: ×1,000)

  • Fig. 6 Histological findings of H&E staining of the jaw bone irradiated with 20 Gy. The histological features with 20 Gy irradiation showed the presence of resorption line (A1, A2) with osteoclast cells (C1, C2, C3; arrows), inflammatory infiltrate (A3) and empty osteocyte lacunae (B1, B2, B3; arrowheads). A1, A2: resorption line; A3 arrows: inflammatory cell; B1, B2, B3 arrowheads: empty osteocyte lacunae; C1, C2, C3 arrows: osteoclast cells; C3 arrowheads: dead bone border line. (A1: ×100; A2: ×200, A3, B1, B2, B3, C1: ×400; C2, C3: ×1,000)


Reference

References

1. Kim SM, Woo KM, Myoung H, Lee JH, Lee SK. 2015; Tissue engineering treatment in osteomyelitis of the jaws. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 12:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-013-0414-4 . DOI: 10.1007/s13770-013-0414-4.
Article
2. Støre G, Boysen M. 2000; Mandibular osteoradionecrosis: clinical behaviour and diagnostic aspects. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 25:378–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00367.x . DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00367.x. PMID: 11012651.
Article
3. Costa DA, Costa TP, Netto EC, Joaquim N, Ventura I, Pratas AC, et al. 2016; New perspectives on the conservative management of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: a literature review. Head Neck. 38:1708–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24495 . DOI: 10.1002/hed.24495. PMID: 27240248.
Article
4. Marx RE. 1983; Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 41:283–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90294-x . DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90294-X. PMID: 6572704.
Article
5. Delanian S, Lefaix JL. 2004; The radiation-induced fibroatrophic process: therapeutic perspective via the antioxidant pathway. Radiother Oncol. 73:119–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.021 . DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.021. PMID: 15542158.
Article
6. Monson LA, Jing XL, Donneys A, Farberg AS, Buchman SR. 2013; Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 24:1593–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826cfeea . DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826cfeea. PMID: 24036733. PMCID: PMC5111555.
Article
7. Cohen M, Nishimura I, Tamplen M, Hokugo A, Beumer J, Steinberg ML, et al. 2011; Animal model of radiogenic bone damage to study mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Am J Otolaryngol. 32:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.06.001 . DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.06.001. PMID: 20719407.
Article
8. Vissink A, Burlage FR, Spijkervet FK, Jansma J, Coppes RP. 2003; Prevention and treatment of the consequences of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 14:213–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400306 . DOI: 10.1177/154411130301400306. PMID: 12799324.
Article
9. Zhang WB, Zheng LW, Chua D, Cheung LK. 2010; Bone regeneration after radiotherapy in an animal model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68:2802–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.024 . DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.024. PMID: 20727641.
Article
10. He J, Qiu W, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Zhang X, He Y. 2011; Effects of irradiation on growth and differentiation-related gene expression in osteoblasts. J Craniofac Surg. 22:1635–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e5f66 . DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e5f66. PMID: 21959403.
Article
11. Springer IN, Niehoff P, Açil Y, Marget M, Lange A, Warnke PH, et al. 2008; BMP-2 and bFGF in an irradiated bone model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 36:210–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.001 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.001. PMID: 17945502.
Article
12. Grimm G. 1969; [Animal experimental studies on the radiation injuries in the mandibles of full grown rabbits. I. Morphological and histochemical findings]. Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte. 53:307–35. German.
13. Grimm G. 1970; [Animal experimental studies on the pathogenesis of radiogenic bone injuries in the mandibles of adult rabbits. II. Histometric data]. Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte. 54:352–62. German.
14. Hamilton SA, Pecaut MJ, Gridley DS, Travis ND, Bandstra ER, Willey JS, et al. 2006; A murine model for bone loss from therapeutic and space-relevant sources of radiation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 101:789–93. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01078.2005 . DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01078.2005. PMID: 16741258.
Article
15. Würzler KK, DeWeese TL, Sebald W, Reddi AH. 1998; Radiation-induced impairment of bone healing can be overcome by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Craniofac Surg. 9:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199803000-00009 . DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199803000-00009. PMID: 9586541.
Article
16. Arnold M, Stas P, Kummermehr J, Schultz-Hector S, Trott KR. 1998; Radiation-induced impairment of bone healing in the rat femur: effects of radiation dose, sequence and interval between surgery and irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 48:259–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00039-5 . DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00039-5.
Article
17. Ryu SH, Moon SY, Choi EK, Kim JH, Ahn SD, Song SY, et al. 2008; Establishment of a single dose radiation model of oral mucositis in mice. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 26:257–62. https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.257 . DOI: 10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.257.
Article
18. Kurihashi T, Iwata H, Nasu M, Yosue T. 2002; Experimental study on wound healing of alveolar bone sockets in the rat maxilla after X-ray irradiation. Odontology. 90:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102660200005 . DOI: 10.1007/s102660200005. PMID: 12955563.
Article
19. Niehoff P, Springer IN, Açil Y, Lange A, Marget M, Roldán JC, et al. 2008; HDR brachytherapy irradiation of the jaw - as a new experimental model of radiogenic bone damage. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 36:203–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.01.003 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.01.003. PMID: 18436449.
Article
20. Tamplen M, Trapp K, Nishimura I, Armin B, Steinberg M, Beumer J, et al. 2011; Standardized analysis of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in a rat model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 145:404–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811400576 . DOI: 10.1177/0194599811400576. PMID: 21493310.
Article
21. Nanashima N, Ito K, Ishikawa T, Nakano M, Nakamura T. 2012; Damage of hair follicle stem cells and alteration of keratin expression in external radiation-induced acute alopecia. Int J Mol Med. 30:579–84. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1018 . DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1018. PMID: 22692500.
Article
22. Tchanque-Fossuo CN, Monson LA, Farberg AS, Donneys A, Zehtabzadeh AJ, Razdolsky ER, et al. 2011; Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the murine mandible: part I. A histomorphometric assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 128:114–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821741d4 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821741d4. PMID: 21701328. PMCID: PMC3132535.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr