Ann Rehabil Med.  2020 Aug;44(4):273-283. 10.5535/arm.19125.

Ultrasound Imaging of the Trunk Muscles in Acute Stroke Patients and Relations With Balance Scales

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To examine the correlation between ultrasonographic trunk muscle parameters and balance scales in mild acute stroke patients.
Methods
A total of 55 stroke patients with hemiparesis and motor power grade ≥4 in the manual motor test were included. The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Trunk Control Test (TCT) were used to evaluate patient balance function. Ultrasonographic parameters were measured on both non-paretic and paretic sides of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, transversus abdominis, and erector spinae muscles. Resting thickness and contraction thickness were measured in all muscles, and contractility and contractility ratio were calculated based on measured thicknesses. The differences between paretic and non-paretic muscle parameters, and the correlation between ultrasonographic parameters and balance scales were analyzed. Stroke patients were divided into two groups according to their fall risk. Ultrasonographic measurements between the two groups were compared.
Results
All muscles’ contraction thickness and contractility were significantly different between paretic and non-paretic sides (p<0.001). Contractility ratios of all trunk muscles showed a significant correlation with SARA, BBS, TUG, and TCT (p<0.05). Contractility ratios of all muscles were significantly different between high- and low-risk fall groups (p<0.05).
Conclusion
The contractility ratio in stroke patients reflects their balance disturbance and fall risk and it may serve as a new parameter for ultrasound imaging of trunk muscles.

Keyword

Ultrasonography; Postural balance; Stroke; Paraspinal muscles; Abdominal muscles

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study design. A total of 55 patients were selected as study participants. BBS, Berg Balance Scale.

  • Fig. 2. Ultrasonographic images of the RA muscle (A), lateral abdominal muscle (B), and ES muscle (C). Thickness was measured in the resting and contraction states. RA, rectus abdominis; EO, external oblique; IO, internal oblique; TrA, transversus abdominis; ES, erector spinae.


Reference

1. Ryerson S, Byl NN, Brown DA, Wong RA, Hidler JM. Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008; 32:14–20.
Article
2. Yu SH, Park SD. The effects of core stability strength exercise on muscle activity and trunk impairment scale in stroke patients. J Exerc Rehabil. 2013; 9:362–7.
Article
3. Karatas M, Cetin N, Bayramoglu M, Dilek A. Trunk muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in unihemispheric stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 83:81–7.
Article
4. Juneja G, Czyrny JJ, Linn RT. Admission balance and outcomes of patients admitted for acute inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77:388–93.
5. Sandin KJ, Smith BS. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke. 1990; 21:82–6.
Article
6. Bohannon RW, Leary KM. Standing balance and function over the course of acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76:994–6.
Article
7. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP, Wang CH. Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2002; 33:2626–30.
Article
8. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Troch M, Herregodts I, Lafosse C, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20:451–8.
Article
9. Winser SJ, Smith C, Hale LA, Claydon LS, Whitney SL. Balance outcome measures in cerebellar ataxia: a Delphi survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37:165–70.
Article
10. Kim BR, Lim JH, Lee SA, Park S, Koh SE, Lee IS, et al. Usefulness of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) in ataxic stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:772–80.
Article
11. Richardson CA, Jull GA. Muscle control-pain control. What exercises would you prescribe? Man Ther. 1995; 1:2–10.
Article
12. Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:242–9.
Article
13. McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newham DJ, Milligan P, Critchley DJ. The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19:337–42.
Article
14. Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27:682–92.
Article
15. Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW. Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain: ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29:2560–6.
16. Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Nascimento DP, Pinto RZ, Franco MR, Hodges PW. Discriminative and reliability analyses of ultrasound measurement of abdominal muscles recruitment. Man Ther. 2011; 16:463–9.
Article
17. Kiesel KB, Uhl TL, Underwood FB, Rodd DW, Nitz AJ. Measurement of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Man Ther. 2007; 12:161–6.
Article
18. Peurala SH, Karttunen AH, Sjogren T, Paltamaa J, Heinonen A. Evidence for the effectiveness of walking training on walking and self-care after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46:387–99.
Article
19. Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, Prist V, Zhang X, Dispa D, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:442.
Article
20. Bogle Thorbahn LD, Newton RA. Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly persons. Phys Ther. 1996; 76:576–83.
Article
21. Kim HD, Jeon DM, Bae HW, Kim JG, Han N, Eom MJ. Changes in activation of abdominal muscles at selected angles during trunk exercise by using ultrasonography. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015; 39:950–6.
Article
22. Teyhen DS, Gill NW, Whittaker JL, Henry SM, Hides JA, Hodges P. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37:450–66.
Article
23. Watanabe K, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, Shimizu K. Use of ultrasonography to evaluate thickness of the erector spinae muscle in maximum flexion and extension of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29:1472–7.
Article
24. Kim HD, You JM, Han N, Eom MJ, Kim JG. Ultrasonographic measurement of transverse abdominis in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38:317–26.
Article
25. Stokes M, Hides J, Elliott J, Kiesel K, Hodges P. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the posterior paraspinal muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37:581–95.
Article
26. Horak FB. Clinical measurement of postural control in adults. Phys Ther. 1987; 67:1881–5.
Article
27. Paulus WM, Straube A, Brandt T. Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain. 1984; 107(Pt 4):1143–63.
28. Granata KP, England SA. Stability of dynamic trunk movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:E271–6.
Article
29. Niam S, Cheung W, Sullivan PE, Kent S, Gu X. Balance and physical impairments after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80:1227–33.
Article
30. English C, McLennan H, Thoirs K, Coates A, Bernhardt J. Loss of skeletal muscle mass after stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2010; 5:395–402.
Article
31. Jorgensen L, Jacobsen BK. Changes in muscle mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content in the legs after stroke: a 1 year prospective study. Bone. 2001; 28:655–9.
Article
32. Carin-Levy G, Greig C, Young A, Lewis S, Hannan J, Mead G. Longitudinal changes in muscle strength and mass after acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21:201–7.
Article
33. Stetts DM, Freund JE, Allison SC, Carpenter G. A rehabilitative ultrasound imaging investigation of lateral abdominal muscle thickness in healthy aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009; 32:60–6.
Article
34. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 2006; 34:320–6.
Article
35. Park HJ, Oh DW, Shin WS. The study of asymmetrical contraction of the lateral abdominal muscles in stroke patients using ultrasound imaging. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2012; 7:319–27.
Article
36. Tahan N, Khademi-Kalantari K, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mikaili S, Baghban AA, Jaberzadeh S. Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study. J Physiol Anthropol. 2016; 35:17.
Article
37. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Ishikawa Y, Noguchi H, Kamo K, et al. Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010; 28:82–7.
Article
38. Belavy DL, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D. Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Physiol Meas. 2015; 36:2285–99.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr