J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2020 Jun;36(2):70-79. 10.14368/jdras.2020.36.2.70.

Effect of attachments and palatal coverage of maxillary implant overdenture on stress distribution: a finite element analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of attachments and palatal coverage on stress distribution in maxillary implant overdenture using finite element analysis.
Materials and Methods
Four maxillary overdenture 3-D models with four implants placed in the anterior region were fabricated with computer-aided design. 1) Ball-F: Non-splinted ball attachment and full palatal coverage, 2) Ball-P: Non-splinted ball attachment and U-shaped partial palatal coverage, 3) Bar-F: Splinted milled bar attachment and full palatal coverage, 4) Bar-P: Splinted milled bar attachment and U-shaped partial palatal coverage. Stress distribution analysis was performed with ANSYS workbench 14. 100 N vertical load was applied at the right first molar unilaterally and maximum stress was calculated at the implant, peri-implant bone and mucosa.
Results
The use of the ball attachment showed lower maximum stress on implant and peri-implant bone than the use of the milled bar attachment. But it showed contrary tendency in the mucosa. Regardless of attachment, full palatal coverage showed lower maximum stress on implant, peri-implant bone and mucosa.
Conclusion
Within the limitation of this study, ball attachment improved stress distribution on implant and periimplant bone rather than milled bar attachment in maxillary implant overdenture. Also, full palatal coverage is more favorable in stress distribution.

Keyword

implant overdenture; attachment; finite element analysis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 3-D model of maxilla and overdenture.

  • Fig. 2 Dimensions of the ridge and location of implants.

  • Fig. 3 3-D models of implant and attachment system. (A) Ball attachment, (B) Milled bar attachment.

  • Fig. 4 3-D models of Maxillary overdentures. (A) Full palatal coverage, (B) Partial palatal coverage.

  • Fig. 5 Stress distribution on implant. (A) Ball-F, (B) Ball-P, (C) Bar-F, (D) Bar-P.

  • Fig. 6 Stress distribution on peri-implant bone. (A) Ball-F, (B) Ball-P, (C) Bar-F, (D) Bar-P.

  • Fig. 7 Stress distribution on mucosa. (A) Ball-F, (B) Ball-P, (C) Bar-F, (D) Bar-P.

  • Fig. 8 Chart of maximum stress of Ball-F and Bar-F groups.

  • Fig. 9 Chart of maximum stress of Ball-P and Bar-P groups.


Reference

References

1. Jemt T, Book K, Karlsson S. 1993; Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8:301–8.
2. Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. 1992; Treatment of edentulous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 68:503–8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90419-B. PMID: 1432770.
3. Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, van Steenberghe D. 1991; Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dent. 65:671–80. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90205-B. PMID: 2051392.
4. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. 2000; Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 11(Suppl 1):108–25. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x. PMID: 11168261.
5. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. 1988; A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 3:129–34. PMID: 3075194.
6. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, et al. 1995; Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 10:33–42.
7. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. 1996; A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11:291–8. PMID: 8752550.
8. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. 2000; Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 15:15–46. PMID: 10697938.
9. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GV. 1994; Mechanical Loading of Brånemark Implants Affects Interfacial Bone Modeling and Remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 9:345–60.
10. Lavelle CL. 1993; Biomechanical considerations of prosthodontic therapy: the urgency of research into alveolar bone responses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8:179–85.
11. Närhi TO, Hevinga M, Voorsmit RA, Kalk W. 2001; Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 16:259–66. PMID: 11324214.
12. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. 1992; Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 3:104–11. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x. PMID: 1290790.
13. Shafie H. 2007. Principles of attachment selection. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Implant Overdentures. Blackwell;Ames, Iowa:
14. Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. 2004; Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. J Prosthet Dent. 91:421–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.017. PMID: 15153848.
15. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. 2003; ln Vitro Study of a Mandibular Implant Overdenture Retained with Ball, Magnet, or Bar Attachments: Comparison of Load Transfer and Denture Stability. Int J Prosthodont. 16:128–34.
16. Barão VAR, Assunção WG, Tabata LF, Delben JA, Gomes EA, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP. 2009; Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. J Craniofac Surg. 20:1066–71. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395. PMID: 19553853.
17. Tanino F, Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Minakuchi S. 2007; Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Int J Prosthodont. 20:193–8. PMID: 17455444.
18. Hussein MO. 2013; Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 5:333–40. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.333. PMID: 24049576. PMCID: PMC3774949.
19. Giddon DB, Dreisbach ME, Pfaffman C, Manly RS. 1954; Relative abilities of natural and artificial dentition patients for judging the sweetness of solid foods. J Prosthet Dent. 4:263–8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(54)90104-3.
20. Shannon IL, Terry JM, Nakamoto RY. 1970; Palatal coverage and parotid flow rate. J Prosthet Dent. 24:601–7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(70)90095-8. PMID: 5273660.
21. Strain JC. 1952; The influence of complete dentures upon taste perception. J Prosthet Dent. 2:60–7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(52)90013-9.
22. Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. 1994; Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 9:184–90. PMID: 8206554.
23. Kim HS, Shin SW. 2005; Three-dimensional analysis of the normal dentition and edentulous maxilla of Koreans. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 43:191–203.
24. Kydd WL, Daly CH, Wheeler 3rd JB. 1971; The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J. 21:430–41. PMID: 5292203.
25. Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. 2012; Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 27:69–76.
26. Osman RB, Elkhadem AH, Ma S, Swain MV. 2013; Finite element analysis of a novel implant distribution to support maxillary overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 28:1–10. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2303. PMID: 23377076.
27. Je HJ, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS, Hawong JS. 2004; Effect of anchorage systems and palatal coverage of denture base on load transfer with maxillary implant-supporting overdentures: A three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 42:397–411.
28. Williams BH, Ochiai KT, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. 2001; Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs. J Prosthet Dent. 86:603–7. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.120838. PMID: 11753311.
29. Ogata K, Satoh M. 1995; Centre and magnitude of vertical forces in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil. 22:113–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00244.x. PMID: 7722742.
30. Kim MJ, Hong SO. 2016; Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage. J Adv Prosthodont. 8:85–93. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.85. PMID: 27141251. PMCID: PMC4852271.
31. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. 1996; Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 76:165–9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90301-7.
32. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. 2005; Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20:578–83. PMID: 16161742.
33. Vafaei F, Khoshhal M, Bayat-Movahed S, Ahangary AH, Firooz F, Izady A, Rakhshan V. 2011; Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 37:421–9. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00057. PMID: 20712443.
34. Zembic A, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. 2015; Within-subject comparison of maxillary implant-supported overdentures with and without palatal coverage. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 17:570–9. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12125. PMID: 23899103.
35. Al-Zubeidi MI, Alsabeeha NH, Thomson WM, Payne AG. 2012; Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14:696–707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00306.x. PMID: 21166990.
Full Text Links
  • JDRAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr