Restor Dent Endod.  2020 May;45(2):e24. 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e24.

Dentin moisture conditions strongly influence its interactions with bioactive root canal sealers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey
  • 2Discipline of Endodontology, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR

Abstract


Objectives
It is known that bioactive materials interact with the dentin to undergo biomineralization. The exact role of moisture in this interaction is unknown. Here, we investigate the effects of dentin moisture conditions on the dislocation resistance of two bioactive root canal sealers (MTA Fillapex [Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas] and GuttaFlow BioSeal [Colténe/Whaledent AG]) at 3 weeks and 3 months after obturation.
Materials and Methods
Mandibular premolars (n = 120) were prepared and randomly divided into 3 groups based on the dentin condition: group 1, dry dentin; group 2, moist dentin; group 3, wet dentin. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for root canal filling: MTA Fillapex and GuttaFlow BioSeal. Dislocation resistance was evaluated by measuring the push-out bond strength at 3 weeks and 3 months. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.
Results
Moist dentin resulted in higher bond strength values for both materials at both time points. This was significantly higher than wet and dry dentin for both the sealers at the 3 months (p < 0.05), while at 3 weeks it was significant only for GuttaFlow Bioseal. The different moisture conditions demonstrated similar trends in their effects on the dislocation resistance of the 2 root canal sealers.
Conclusions
The dentin moisture conditions had a significant impact on its interaction with the bioactive materials tested. Maintaining moist dentin, but not dry or wet dentin, may be advantageous before the filling root canals with bioactive sealers.

Keyword

Bioactive; Bond strength; Dentin; Dislocation resistance; GuttaFlow BioSeal; MTA Fillapex

Figure

  • Figure 1 Representative scanning electron microscope images showing the cohesive failure modes after bond failure. Arrows indicate sealer.D, dentin.


Cited by  1 articles

How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres, Reinhilde Jacobs, Mostafa EzEldeen, Karla de Faria-Vasconcelos, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Bernardo Camargo dos Santos, Mário Tanomaru-Filho
Restor Dent Endod. 2021;47(1):e2.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2.


Reference

1. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007; 40:921–939. PMID: 17931389.
Article
2. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005; 10:30–76.
3. Nagas E, Uyanik MO, Eymirli A, Cehreli ZC, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV, Durmaz V. Dentin moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2012; 38:240–244. PMID: 22244645.
Article
4. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36:16–27. PMID: 20003930.
Article
5. Mandal P, Zhao J, Sah SK, Huang Y, Liu J. In vitro cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow 2 on human gingival fibroblasts. J Endod. 2014; 40:1156–1159. PMID: 25069924.
6. Akcay M, Arslan H, Durmus N, Mese M, Capar ID. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and GuttaFlow BioSeal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: a confocal microscopic study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016; 48:70–76. PMID: 26774730.
Article
7. Razmi H, Bolhari B, Karamzadeh Dashti N, Fazlyab M. The effect of canal dryness on bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy-resin sealers after irrigation with sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine. Iran Endod J. 2016; 11:129–133. PMID: 27141222.
8. Ayad MF, Farag AM, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of lactic acid irrigant on shear bond strength of Epiphany adhesive sealer to human dentin surface. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109:e100–e106. PMID: 20416513.
Article
9. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Serrano SA, Vidueira M, Macchi RL. Significance of moist root canal dentin with the use of methacrylate-based endodontic sealers: an in vitro coronal dye leakage study. J Endod. 2008; 34:76–79. PMID: 18155498.
10. Reddy P, Neelakantan P, Sanjeev K, Matinlinna JP. Effect of irrigant neutralizing reducing agents on the compromised dislocation resistance of an epoxy resin and a methacrylate resin-based root canal sealer in vitro . Int J Adhes Adhes. 2018; 82:206–210.
11. Gancedo-Caravia L, Garcia-Barbero E. Influence of humidity and setting time on the push-out strength of mineral trioxide aggregate obturations. J Endod. 2006; 32:894–896. PMID: 16934637.
Article
12. Dias KC, Soares CJ, Steier L, Versiani MA, Rached-Júnior FJ, Pécora JD, Silva-Sousa YT, de Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of drying protocol with isopropyl alcohol on the bond strength of resin-based sealers to the root dentin. J Endod. 2014; 40:1454–1458. PMID: 25146032.
Article
13. Paula AC, Brito-Júnior M, Araújo CC, Sousa-Neto MD, Cruz-Filho AM. Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers. Braz Oral Res. 2016; 30:e50.
Article
14. Zhong X, Shen Y, Ma J, Chen WX, Haapasalo M. Quality of root filling after obturation with gutta-percha and 3 different sealers of minimally instrumented root canals of the maxillary first molar. J Endod. 2019; 45:1030–1035. PMID: 31182216.
Article
15. Barbosa-Ribeiro M, Arruda-Vasconcelos R, Fabretti FL, Silva EJNL, De-Deus G, Gomes BPFA. Evaluation of apically extruded debris using positive and negative pressure irrigation systems in association with different irrigants. Braz Dent J. 2018; 29:184–188. PMID: 29898066.
Article
16. Silva EJNL, Carvalho CR, Belladonna FG, Prado MC, Lopes RT, De-Deus G, Moreira EJL. Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23:681–687.
Article
17. Khalil MM, Abdelrahman MH, El-Mallah S. Bond strength and solubility of a novel polydimethylsiloxane-gutta-percha calcium silicate-containing root canal sealer. Dent Med Probl. 2019; 56:161–165. PMID: 31274254.
Article
18. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010; 36:286–291. PMID: 20113792.
Article
19. Neelakantan P, Ahmed HM, Wong MC, Matinlinna JP, Cheung GS. Effect of root canal irrigation protocols on the dislocation resistance of mineral trioxide aggregate-based materials: a systematic review of laboratory studies. Int Endod J. 2018; 51:847–861. PMID: 29377170.
Article
20. Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Sharma S. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod. 2013; 39:893–896. PMID: 23791258.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr