Korean Circ J.  2020 Jun;50(6):499-508. 10.4070/kcj.2019.0231.

Clinical Impact of Beta Blockers in Patients with Myocardial Infarction from the Korean National Health Insurance Database

Affiliations
  • 1Cardiovascular & Arrhythmia Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Cardiology, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Sanggye-Paik Hospital, Inje Universiy College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Whether beta blockers favorably impact the clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains in debate. We investigated the impact of beta blocker on major clinical outcomes during 2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI.
Methods
All patients with the first AMI treated with PCI for the period of 2005 to 2014 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims database were enrolled. We defined the regular user as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% and non-user as MPR=0%. We compared the occurrence of all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke according to adherence of beta-blockers. A 1:1 propensity score-matching was conducted to adjust for between-group differences.
Results
We identified a total 81,752 patients with met eligible criteria. At discharge, 63,885 (78%) patients were prescribed beta blockers. For 2 years follow up period, regular users were 53,991 (66%) patients, non-users were 10,991 (13%). In the propensity score matched population, regular use of beta blocker was associated with a 36% reduced risk of composite adverse events (all death, MI or stroke) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.636; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.555–0.728; p<0.001). Compared to no use of beta blocker, regular use significantly reduced all death (HR, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.668–0.812; p<0.001), MI (HR, 0.729; 95% CI, 0.611–0.803; p<0.001) and stroke (HR, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.650–0.791; p<0.001).
Conclusions
Prescription of beta blocker in patients with AMI after PCI was sequentially increased. Continuous regular use of beta blocker for 2 years after AMI reduced major adverse events compared to no use of beta blocker.

Keyword

Adrenergic beta-antagonists; Myocardial infarction; Secondary prevention

Cited by  3 articles

Clinical Impact of Beta-blockers in the Revascularization Era
Soo-Jin Kang
Korean Circ J. 2020;50(6):509-510.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0112.

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is There a Winner?
Hak Seung Lee, Jeehoon Kang
Korean Circ J. 2020;50(11):995-997.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0398.

Role of β-Blockers in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Management in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: Good Symptom Control or Something More?
Ji Woong Roh, Yongcheol Kim
Korean Circ J. 2022;52(7):556-557.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0105.


Reference

1. Roberts R, Croft C, Gold HK, et al. Effect of propranolol on myocardial-infarct size in a randomized blinded multicenter trial. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311:218–225. PMID: 6377070.
Article
2. Poirier L, Tobe SW. Contemporary use of β-blockers: clinical relevance of subclassification. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30:S9–S15. PMID: 24684855.
Article
3. Bloch Thomsen PE, Jons C, Raatikainen MJ, et al. Long-term recording of cardiac arrhythmias with an implantable cardiac monitor in patients with reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification After Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. Circulation. 2010; 122:1258–1264. PMID: 20837897.
4. Mak IT, Weglicki WB. Protection by beta-blocking agents against free radical-mediated sarcolemmal lipid peroxidation. Circ Res. 1988; 63:262–266. PMID: 2898307.
Article
5. Dondo TB, Hall M, West RM, et al. β-blockers and mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure or ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69:2710–2720. PMID: 28571635.
Article
6. Yang JH, Hahn JY, Song YB, et al. Association of beta-blocker therapy at discharge with clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7:592–601. PMID: 24947717.
7. Kozma CM, Dickson M, Phillips AL, Meletiche DM. Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7:509–516. PMID: 23807840.
Article
8. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173:676–682. PMID: 21330339.
Article
9. Hjalmarson A. Effects of beta blockade on sudden cardiac death during acute myocardial infarction and the postinfarction period. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80:35J–9J.
Article
10. von Arnim T. Medical treatment to reduce total ischemic burden: total ischemic burden bisoprolol study (TIBBS), a multicenter trial comparing bisoprolol and nifedipine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:231–238. PMID: 7798508.
Article
11. Norwegian Multicenter Study Group. Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1981; 304:801–807. PMID: 7010157.
12. Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial Resarch Group. A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA. 1982; 247:1707–1714. PMID: 7038157.
13. Dargie HJ. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357:1385–1390. PMID: 11356434.
14. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 130:e344–426. PMID: 25249585.
Article
15. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:e78–140. PMID: 23256914.
16. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:119–177. PMID: 28886621.
17. Smith SC Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:2432–2446. PMID: 22055990.
18. Dahl Aarvik M, Sandven I, Dondo TB, et al. Effect of oral β-blocker treatment on mortality in contemporary post-myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019; 5:12–20. PMID: 30192930.
Article
19. Park JJ, Kim SH, Kang SH, et al. Effect of β-blockers beyond 3 years after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7:e007567. PMID: 29502101.
20. Puymirat E, Riant E, Aissaoui N, et al. β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2016; 354:i4801. PMID: 27650822.
Article
21. Kimm H, Yun JE, Lee SH, Jang Y, Jee SH. Validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in Korean national medical health insurance claims data: the Korean Heart Study (1). Korean Circ J. 2012; 42:10–15. PMID: 22363378.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr