J Audiol Otol.  2020 Apr;24(2):85-90. 10.7874/jao.2019.00360.

Better Understanding of Direct Bone-Conduction Measurement:Comparison with Frequency-Specific Bone-Conduction Tonesand Brainstem Responses

• Kim Y
• Han W
• Park S
• You S
• Kwak C
• Seo Y
• Lee J

• KMID: 2500227
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2019.00360

Abstract

Background and Objectives
The present study aimed to compare thresholds of direct bone-conduction (BC direct) with those of behaviorally measured BC pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and objectively measured BC auditory brainstem response (ABR) to confirm the clinical feasibility of their relationships. Subjects and Methods: Young adults with normal hearing participated in the study to determine the thresholds from three measurements at four testing frequencies. In the BC direct, the vibrator of a bone-anchored hearing aid softband was placed on the right mastoid of each subject. In both PTA and ABR, a B71 bone oscillator was placed on the subject’s right mastoid. While the subject’s thresholds of BC direct and BC PTA were determined with a clinically routine 5-dB step procedure, BC ABR was conducted to determine the individual’s hearing sensitivity by a peak V of the waveform using tone-burst and click stimuli. Results: The BC direct showed a different pattern between low and high frequencies. Precisely, its thresholds were 13.25 and 12.25 dB HL at 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively, but 19 and 19.75 dB HL at 2 and 4 kHz, respectively. A significant positive correlation existed between BC direct and PTA at 1 kHz, which was also correlated with ABR. Conclusions: Based on the current data, the thresholds of BC direct were similar to BC PTA at low frequencies and BC ABR at high frequencies. The thresholds of BC direct might be predictable at approximately 5 dB higher (or lower) than that in PTA, although a large data set is required for standardization. J Audiol Otol 2020;24(2):85-90

Keyword

Bone-anchored hearing system; Direct bone-conduction; Bone-conduction thresholds; Bone-conduction hearing