J Korean Fract Soc.  2020 Jan;33(1):52-61. 10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.1.52.

Periprosthetic Fractures following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. sim_ja@gilhospital.com

Abstract

Recently, as the elderly population increases, the incidence of total knee arthroplasty has increased, with a concomitant increase in the frequency of periprosthetic fractures. To determine the treatment plan for fractures, the treatment method should be determined by the patient's age, osteoporosis, fixation status of the implant, and type of fracture. In recent years, operative treatment with reduction and stable fixation, rather than non-operative treatment, was used to promote early joint movement and gait. On the other hand, it is necessary to select an appropriate operative method to reduce complications of surgery, such as nonunion and infection, and expect a good prognosis. In this review, periprosthetic fractures were divided into femur, tibia, and patella fractures, and their causes, risk factors, classification, and treatment are discussed.

Keyword

Knee; Arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fractures

MeSH Terms

Aged
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*
Classification
Femur
Gait
Hand
Humans
Incidence
Joints
Knee
Methods
Osteoporosis
Patella
Periprosthetic Fractures*
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Tibia

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Periprosthetic fracture with a comminuted fracture in the medial cortex of the distal femur was fixed with dual locking plates using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. (A, B) Preoperative radiographs. (C, D) Postoperative radiographs. (E-G) Radiographs one year after surgery.

  • Fig. 2 Extruded nail (A) caused the wear of polyethylene post (B).

  • Fig. 3 Periprosthetic fracture of the proximal tibia was fixed with dual locking plates using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. (A, B) Preoperative radiographs. (C, D) Postoperative radiographs. (E-G) Radiographs 1 year after surgery.

  • Fig. 4 Patellar fracture with non-operative treatment obtained bony union. (A) Radiograph at the time of injury. (B) Radiograph six months after injury.


Reference

1. Dennis DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001; 50:379–389.
Article
2. Cordeiro EN, Costa RC, Carazzato JG, Silva Jdos S. Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (252):182–189.
Article
3. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Periprosthetic fractures adjacent to total knee implants: treatment and clinical results. Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47:437–448.
4. Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS. Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9:521–526.
Article
5. Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990; 5:267–276.
Article
6. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:265–277.
Article
7. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM. Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3:185–187.
Article
8. Scott RD. Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3:381.
9. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2756–2762.
10. Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL Jr, Heppenstall RB. Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (222):212–222.
Article
11. Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12:12–20.
Article
12. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:167–175.
Article
13. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, et al. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:876–881.
Article
14. Cain PR, Rubash HE, Wissinger HA, McClain EJ. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (208):205–214.
Article
15. Ostrum RF, Geel C. Indirect reduction and internal fixation of supracondylar femur fractures without bone graft. J Orthop Trauma. 1995; 9:278–284.
Article
16. Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and Internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biologic (indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10:372–377.
Article
17. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1997; 28 Suppl 1:A20–A30.
Article
18. Russell GV Jr, Smith DG. Minimally invasive treatment of distal femur fractures: report of a technique. J Trauma. 1999; 47:799–801.
Article
19. Ricci WM, Loftus T, Cox C, Borrelli J. Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20:190–196.
Article
20. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13:401–406.
Article
21. Herrera DA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA, Levy BA, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: systematic review of 415 cases (1981–2006). Acta Orthop. 2008; 79:22–27.
Article
22. DiGioia AM 3rd, Rubash HE. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty A literature review and treatment algorithm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (271):135–142.
23. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R. The development of the distal femur Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Injury. 2001; 32 Suppl 3:SC24–SC31.
Article
24. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18:494–502.
Article
25. Murrell GA, Nunley JA. Interlocked supracondylar intramedullary nails for supracondylar fractures after total knee arthroplasty. A new treatment method. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:37–42.
Article
26. Lee SS, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Seo JG. Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134:47–52.
Article
27. Pelfort X, Torres-Claramunt R, Hinarejos P, Leal J, Gil-González S, Puig L. Extension malunion of the femoral component after retrograde nailing: no sequelae at 6 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27:158–161.
28. Jabczenski FF, Crawford M. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty. A preliminary report of four cases. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:95–101.
Article
29. Rolston LR, Christ DJ, Halpern A, O'Connor PL, Ryan TG, Uggen WM. Treatment of supracondylar fractures of the femur proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77:924–931.
Article
30. McLaren AC, Dupont JA, Schroeber DC. Open reduction internal fixation of supracondylar fractures above total knee arthroplasties using the intramedullary supracondylar rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (302):194–198.
Article
31. Maniar RN, Umlas ME, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Supracondylar femoral fracture above a PFC posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty treated with supracondylar nailing. A unique technical problem. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:637–639.
Article
32. Freedman EL, Hak DJ, Johnson EE, Eckardt JJ. Total knee replacement including a modular distal femoral component in elderly patients with acute fracture or nonunion. J Orthop Trauma. 1995; 9:231–237.
Article
33. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (345):113–124.
Article
34. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Stress fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62:226–233.
Article
35. Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic tibial fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:279–286.
36. Born CT, Gil JA, Johnson JP. Periprosthetic tibial fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018; 26:e167–e172.
Article
37. Ruchholtz S, Tomás J, Gebhard F, Larsen MS. Periprosthetic fractures around the knee-the best way of treatment. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2013; 4:93–102.
Article
38. Haller JM, Kubiak EN, Spiguel A, Gardner MJ, Horwitz DS. Intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures distal to total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28:e296–e300.
Article
39. Abbas AM, Morgan-Jones RL. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failure of primary treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1996–2001.
Article
40. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:999–1006.
Article
41. Seeger JB, Jaeger S, Röhner E, Dierkes H, Wassilew G, Clarius M. Treatment of periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: plates versus cannulated screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133:253–257.
Article
42. Preston S, Somerville L, Lanting B, Howard J. Are nucleated cell counts useful in the diagnosis of infection in periprosthetic fracture? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473:2238–2243.
Article
43. Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:183–190.
44. Ortiguera CJ, Berry DJ. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:532–540.
Article
45. Meding JB, Fish MD, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM. Predicting patellar failure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2769–2774.
Article
46. Gross AE. Periprosthetic fractures of the knee: puzzle pieces. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:4 Suppl 1. 47–50.
47. Tharani R, Nakasone C, Vince KG. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:4 Suppl 2. 27–32.
Article
48. Parvizi J, Kim KI, Oliashirazi A, Ong A, Sharkey PF. Periprosthetic patellar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:161–166.
Article
49. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Effect of a lateral release and sacrifice of the superior lateral geniculate artery. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:368–372.
50. Tria AJ Jr, Harwood DA, Alicea JA, Cody RP. Patellar fractures in posterior stabilized knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (299):131–138.
Article
51. Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987; 2:135–140.
Article
52. Grace JN, Sim FH. Fracture of the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (230):168–175.
Article
53. Clayton ML, Thirupathi R. Patellar complications after total condylar arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (170):152–155.
Article
54. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56:1368–1382.
55. Marmor L. Technique for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (230):166–167.
Article
56. Reuben JD, McDonald CL, Woodard PL, Hennington LJ. Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1991; 6:251–258.
Article
57. Bourne RB. Fractures of the patella after total knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:287–291.
Article
58. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4 Suppl:S63–S67.
Article
59. Healy WL, Wasilewski SA, Takei R, Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:197–201.
60. Larson CM, McDowell CM, Lachiewicz PF. One-peg versus three-peg patella component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392):94–100.
Article
61. Hozack WJ, Goll SR, Lotke PA, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr. The treatment of patellar fractures after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rela Res. 1988; (236):123–127.
Article
62. Keating EM, Haas G, Meding JB. Patella fracture after post total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416):93–97.
Article
63. Parvizi J, Seel MJ, Hanssen AD, Berry DJ, Morrey BF. Patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (397):356–361.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr