J Cardiovasc Imaging.  2020 Jan;28(1):33-35. 10.4250/jcvi.2019.0113.

Clinical Utility of Third-generation Dual-source Computed Tomography for Left Ventricular Function Analysis and Coronary Artery Evaluation with Minimal Radiation Exposure

• Cha MJ

• KMID: 2468378
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.0113

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Coronary Vessels*
Radiation Exposure*
Ventricular Function, Left*

Reference

1. Abbara S, Chow BJ, Pena AJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function with 16- and 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 67:481–486.

2. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2:940–946.

3. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46:552–557.

4. Yoshimura N, Sabir A, Kubo T, Lin PJ, Clouse ME, Hatabu H. Correlation between image noise and body weight in coronary CTA with 16-row MDCT. Acad Radiol. 2006; 13:324–328.

5. Meinel FG, Canstein C, Schoepf UJ, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24:1643–1650.

6. Meyer M, Haubenreisser H, Schoepf UJ, et al. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology. 2014; 273:373–382.

7. Hedgire SS, Baliyan V, Ghoshhajra BB, Kalra MK. Recent advances in cardiac computed tomography dose reduction strategies: a review of scientific evidence and technical developments. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017; 4:031211.

8. Lee JW, Nam KJ, Kim JY, et al. Simultaneous assessment of left ventricular function and coronary artery by third-generation dual-source computed tomography using low radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 28:21–32.

9. Geyer LL, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, et al. State of the art: iterative CT reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2015; 276:339–357.

10. Dewey M, Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194:93–102.