Urogenit Tract Infect.  2019 Dec;14(3):87-92. 10.14777/uti.2019.14.3.87.

Is Double J Stenting or Percutaneous Nephrostomy More Suitable for Maximizing the Clinical Effects of Temporary Urinary Diversion for Acute Pyelonephritis with a Complicated Ureteral Stone?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. yookoohan@khu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study compared the clinical benefits of double J (DJ) ureteral stenting with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for the management of acute pyelonephritis (APN) with complicated ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The records of 85 patients with complicated APN between December 2006 and July 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty one patients who underwent DJ or PCN for the management of acute urinary obstruction were enrolled in this study. Some of the participants were excluded for concurrent renal stones, multiple ureteral stones, ureteral stricture, malignancy, and anatomical anomalies. The patient and stone characteristics and peri-procedural laboratory test results of the groups were compared. The success rate, depending on the type of urinary diversion and the presence of immediate complications, were also analyzed.
RESULTS
In this study, 19 patients underwent DJ stenting, and 42 patients underwent PCN as a transient urinary diversion. No failed procedures or immediate complications requiring subsequent intervention were encountered (Clavien-Dindo grade II-V). Urologists preferred PCN to DJ stenting in cases with an elevated serum creatinine level (p=0.001) and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p < 0.001). The indicative parameters for renal injury and septic conditions (white blood cell count, segment neutrophil, and creatinine levels) tended to show immediate improvement, whereas CRP did not; however, the differences in markers were not significant (p=0.701, 0.962, 0.288, and 0.360, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Both DJ stenting and PCN were safe and feasible methods for the management of complicated APN. With experienced urologists or radiologists, there may be little danger of prolonged renal failure or other procedure-related complications.

Keyword

Nephrostomy, percutaneous; Urinary diversion; Pyelonephritis; Ureterolithiasis; Ureteral obstruction

MeSH Terms

Blood Cell Count
C-Reactive Protein
Constriction, Pathologic
Creatinine
Humans
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous*
Neutrophils
Pregnenolone Carbonitrile
Pyelonephritis*
Renal Insufficiency
Retrospective Studies
Stents*
Ureter*
Ureteral Obstruction
Ureterolithiasis
Urinary Diversion*
C-Reactive Protein
Creatinine
Pregnenolone Carbonitrile

Reference

References

1. Hamasuna R, Takahashi S, Nagae H, Kubo T, Yamamoto S, Arakawa S, et al. Obstructive pyelonephritis as a result of urolithiasis in Japan: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Int J Urol. 2015; 22:294–300.
Article
2. Kim B, Myung R, Kim J, Lee MJ, Pai H. Descriptive epidemiology of acute pyelonephritis in Korea, 2010–2014: population-based study. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33:e310.
Article
3. Lee DG, Jeon SH, Lee CH, Lee SJ, Kim JI, Chang SG. Acute pyelonephritis: clinical characteristics and the role of the surgical treatment. J Korean Med Sci. 2009; 24:296–301.
Article
4. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a ‘friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000; 85:408–11.
Article
5. Ku JH, Lee SW, Jeon HG, Kim HH, Oh SJ. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus indwelling ureteral stents in the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction in advanced malignancies: are there differences? Urology. 2004; 64:895–9.
Article
6. Baishya RK, Dhawan DR, Jagtap J, Sabnis R, Desai MR. Percutaneous nephrostomy under ultrasound guidance. Indian J Nephrol. 2011; 21:67.
Article
7. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, et al. EAU/AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007; 178:2418–34.
Article
8. Goldsmith ZG, Oredein-McCoy O, Gerber L, Bañez LL, Sopko DR, Miller MJ, et al. Emergent ureteric stent vs percutaneous nephrostomy for obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis: patterns of use and outcomes from a 15-year experience. BJU Int. 2013; 112:E122–8.
Article
9. Mokhmalji H, Braun PM, Martinez Portillo FJ, Siegsmund M, Alken P, Kohrmann KU. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2001; 165:1088–92.
Article
10. Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL, Summa JA, Mutz JM, Petty BA, et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998; 160:1260–4.
Article
11. Van Glabeke E, Conort P, Chartier-Kastler E, Desrez G, Boyer C, Richard F. [Treatment of complicated renal colic in patients treated with indinavir: value of double J stents]. Prog Urol. 1999; 9:470–3. French.
12. Stables DP. Percutaneous nephrostomy: techniques, indications, and results. Urol Clin North Am. 1982; 9:15–29.
Article
13. Stanley P, Bear JW, Reid BS. Percutaneous nephrostomy in infants and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983; 141:473–7.
Article
Full Text Links
  • UTI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr