1. DeMay RM. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997; 121:229–38.
2. Chivukula M, Austin RM, Shidham VB. Evaluation and significance of hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCG) in liquid-based paps. Cytojournal. 2007; 4:2.
3. Croll E, Rana DN, Walton LJ. Hyperchromatic crowded cell groups in gynaecological liquid-based cytology samples. Br J Biomed Sci. 2010; 67:154–63.
Article
4. Gupta N, John D, Dudding N, Crossley J, Smith JH. Factors contributing to false-negative and potential false-negative cytology reports in SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology. Cytopathology. 2013; 24:39–43.
Article
5. Oh EJ, Jung CK, Kim DH, et al. Current cytology practices in Korea: a nationwide survey by the Korean Society for Cytopathology. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:579–87.
Article
6. Lim SC, Yoo CW. Current status of and perspectives on cervical cancer screening in Korea. J Pathol Transl Med. 2019; 53:210–6.
Article
7. Feratovic R, Lewin SN, Sonoda Y, et al. Cytologic findings after fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Cancer. 2008; 114:1–6.
Article
8. Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE. Cell block preparation by inverted filter sedimentation is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in ThinPrep specimens. Cancer. 2000; 90:265–72.
Article
9. Ge Y, Mody DR, Smith D, Anton R. p16(INK4a) and ProEx C immunostains facilitate differential diagnosis of hyperchromatic crowded groups in liquid-based Papanicolaou tests with menstrual contamination. Acta Cytol. 2012; 56:55–61.
10. Evered A, Edwards J, Powell G. Image analysis of hyperchromatic crowded cell groups in SurePath cervical cytology. Cytopathology. 2013; 24:113–22.
Article