Healthc Inform Res.  2019 Oct;25(4):289-296. 10.4258/hir.2019.25.4.289.

Integrating Genetic Data into Electronic Health Records: Medical Geneticists' Perspectives

Affiliations
  • 1Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • 2School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • 3Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran. mortezahemmat@gmail.com
  • 4Student Research Committee, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Genetic disorders are the main causes of many other diseases. Integrating genetic data into Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can facilitate the management of genetic information and care of patients in clinical practices. The aim of this study was to identify the main requirements for integrating genetic data into the EHR system from the medical geneticists' perspectives.
METHODS
The research was completed in 2018 and consisted of two phases. In the first phase, the main requirements for integrating genetic data into the EHR system were identified by reviewing the literature. In the second phase, a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was developed based on the literature review and the results derived from the first phase. Then, the Delphi method was applied to reach a consensus about the integration requirements.
RESULTS
The findings of the first phase showed that data elements, including patients' and healthcare providers' personal data, clinical and genetic data, technical infrastructure, security issues and functional requirements, should be taken into account before data integration. In the second phase, a consensus was reached for most of the items (mean ≥3.75). The items with a mean value of less than 2.5 did not achieve a consensus and were removed from the final list.
CONCLUSIONS
The integration of genetic data into the EHRs can provide a ground for increasing accuracy and precision in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic disorders. Such integration requires adequate investments to identify users' requirements as well as technical and non-technical issues.

Keyword

Genetics; Genetic Diseases; Medical Informatics; Electronic Health Records; User Requirements

MeSH Terms

Consensus
Delivery of Health Care
Diagnosis
Electronic Health Records*
Genetics
Humans
Investments
Medical Informatics
Methods

Cited by  1 articles

Dynamic Demand-Centered Process-Oriented Data Model for Inventory Management of Hemovigilance Systems
Mahnaz Sohrabi, Mostafa Zandieh, Behrouz Afshar Nadjafi
Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(1):73-81.    doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.1.73.


Reference

1. Shiva N, Tachi SK, Fatemeh AG. Survey of parents' knowledge regarding their children's genetic diseases. Genet Third Millenn. 2011; 9(1):2285–2289.
2. Talebi V. Comparative study of genetic information management system in selected the countries and presentation a model for Iran [dissertation]. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences;2012.
3. Scheuner MT, de Vries H, Kim B, Meili RC, Olmstead SH, Teleki S. Are electronic health records ready for genomic medicine? Genet Med. 2009; 11(7):510–517.
Article
4. Shirts BH, Salama JS, Aronson SJ, Chung WK, Gray SW, Hindorff LA, et al. CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1231–1242.
Article
5. Ullman-Cullere MH, Mathew JP. Emerging landscape of genomics in the Electronic Health Record for personalized medicine. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32(5):512–516.
Article
6. International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics: data elements and their metadata for describing structured clinical genomic sequence information in electronic health records. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization;2017. (ISO/TS 20428:2017).
7. Health Level Seven International. Genomic implementation guidance [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International;2018. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/genomics.html.
8. Van Baren J. GA4GH Schemas Documentation Release 0.0.1 [Internet]. Toronto, Canada: Global Alliance for Genomics & Health;2018. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/ga4gh-schemas/latest/ga4gh-schemas.pdf.
9. Hall JL, Ryan JJ, Bray BE, Brown C, Lanfear D, Newby LK, et al. Merging electronic health record data and genomics for cardiovascular research: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016; 9(2):193–202.
Article
10. Glicksberg BS, Johnson KW, Dudley JT. The next generation of precisionmedicine: observational studies, electronic health records, biobanks and continuous monitoring. Hum Mol Genet. 2018; 27(R1):R56–R62.
11. Robinson JR, Wei WQ, Roden DM, Denny JC. Defining phenotypes from clinical data to drive genomic research. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018; 1:69–92.
Article
12. Shoenbill K, Fost N, Tachinardi U, Mendonca EA. Genetic data and electronic health records: a discussion of ethical, logistical and technological considerations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21(1):171–180.
Article
13. Stark Z, Dolman L, Manolio TA, Ozenberger B, Hill SL, Caulfied MJ, et al. Integrating genomics into healthcare: a global responsibility. Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 104(1):13–20.
Article
14. Gottesman O, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G, Faucett WA, Li R, Manolio TA, et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network: past, present, and future. Genet Med. 2013; 15(10):761–771.
Article
15. Center for Genetic Medicine. Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Northeastern University;2018. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: https://www.cgm.northwestern.edu/research/emerge-network/index.html.
16. Warner JL, Jain SK, Levy MA. Integrating cancer genomic data into electronic health records. Genome Med. 2016; 8(1):113.
Article
17. House of Commons of the United Kingdom. Genomics and genome editing in the NHS [Internet]. London, UK: House of Commons of the United Kingdom;2018. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmsctech/349/349.pdf.
18. Burns BL, Bilkey GA, Coles EP, Bowman FL, Beilby JP, Pachter NS, et al. Healthcare system priorities for successful integration of genomics: an Australian focus. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:41.
Article
19. Davies SC. Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016; generation genome [Internet]. London, UK: Department of Health;2017. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/631043/CMO_annual_report_generation_genome.pdf.
20. The Department of Health. National Health Genomics Policy Framework 2018–2021 [Internet]. Canberra, Australia: The Department of Health;2017. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/national-healthgenomics-policy-framework-2018-2021.
21. O'Daniel JM, McLaughlin HM, Amendola LM, Bale SJ, Berg JS, Bick D, et al. A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories. Genet Med. 2017; 19(5):575–582.
22. Rasmussen LV, Overby CL, Connolly J, Chute CG, Denny JC, Freimuth R, et al. Practical considerations for implementing genomic information resources. Experiences from eMERGE and CSER. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(3):870–882.
23. Orlando LA, Sperber NR, Voils C, Nichols M, Myers RA, Wu RR, et al. Developing a common framework for evaluating the implementation of genomic medicine interventions in clinical care: the IGNITE Network's Common Measures Working Group. Genet Med. 2018; 20(6):655–663.
Article
24. Sperber NR, Carpenter JS, Cavallari LH, J Damschroder L, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Denny JC, et al. Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network. BMC Med Genomics. 2017; 10(1):35.
Article
25. The 100 000 Genomes Project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ. 2018; 361:k1952.
26. Global Alliance. GENOMICS: a federated ecosystem for sharing genomic, clinical data. Science. 2016; 352(6291):1278–1280.
27. Gaff CL, M Winship I, M Forrest S, P Hansen D, Clark J, M Waring P, et al. Preparing for genomic medicine: a real world demonstration of health system change. NPJ Genom Med. 2017; 2:16.
Article
28. Gerrish K, Lacey A. The research process in nursing. . Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell;2010.
29. Health Level Seven International. HL7 Domain Analysis Model: Clinical Genomics, Release1 [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International;2018. cited at 2019 Oct 25. Available from: http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=479.
30. Mehraeen E, Ayatollahi H, Ahmadi M. Health information security in hospitals: the application of security safeguards. Acta Inform Med. 2016; 24(1):47–50.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr