J Korean Acad Oral Health.  2019 Jun;43(2):43-49. 10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.2.43.

Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea. jsh0917@pusan.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
This study evaluated oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) before and after orthodontic treatment (orthodontic-tx) using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire.
METHODS
Ninety-six subjects (32 males, 64 females; 48 ranging between 12-17 years, 48 ranging between 18-29 years) who completed orthodontic-tx in two dental clinics in Busan from May to December 2013 participated in this study. The participants self-reported their OHQoL on the Korean translated version of the OIDP before and during orthodontic-tx when the brackets were removed from their teeth. The OHQoL was again measured 1 month later. The visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (never) to 10 (definitely yes) was used to quantify the OHQoL. The physical, psychological, and social effects of the orthodontic-tx on daily performance were analyzed according to age and gender.
RESULTS
The OHQoL score was lower during the orthodontic-tx (7.49±0.19) than before (5.51±0.18), but the final OHQoL score, after orthodontic-tx (9.39±0.07), was higher than the score before treatment. The trend was the same over all sub performances. Before orthodontic-tx, the OHQoL score related to psychological performance (6.98±0.22) was the lowest compared to physical and social performance. During orthodontic-tx, the scores related to physical performance, especially in the older (0.7 times) and female (0.62 times) groups, decreased the most compared to before treatment. Psychological performance, especially in the older (1.81 times) and female (1.66 times) groups, increased the most after orthodontic-tx.
CONCLUSIONS
This study confirmed that orthodontic-tx affects the OHQoL according to age and gender. Specific approaches, classified by age and gender, are needed to improve the quality of life of orthodontic dental patients.

Keyword

Oral health; Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP); Orthodontics; Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL)

MeSH Terms

Busan
Dental Clinics
Female
Humans
Male
Oral Health
Orthodontics
Quality of Life*
Tooth

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Theoretical framework of consequences of oral impacts5).

  • Fig. 2 Korean Oral Impact on Daily Performanc (OIDP) questionnaires for orthodontic patients before (during, after) orthodontic treatments.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of OHQoL scores before, during and after orthodontic treatments (mean±SE).


Reference

1. World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41:1403–1409.
2. Barbosa TS, Tureli MC, Gavião MB. Validity and reliability of the child perceptions questionnaires in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009; 9:13–20.
Article
3. Atchison KA, Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. The general oral health assessment index (The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index). In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 71–80.
4. Slade GD. The oral health impact profile. In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 93–104.
5. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 151–160.
6. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988; 5:3–18.
7. Jung SH, Ryu JI, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. A Korean version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) scale in elderly populations: validity, reliability and prevalence. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008; 6:17.
Article
8. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2001; 28:152–158.
Article
9. Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life? J Dent Educ. 2008; 72:886–894.
Article
10. Adulyanon S, Vourapukjaru J, Sheiham A. Oral impacts affecting daily performance in a low dental disease Thai population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996; 24:385–389.
Article
11. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:161–169.
12. Usha GV, Thippeswamy HM, Nagesh L. Validity and reliability of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances frequency scale: a cross-sectional survey among adolescents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 36:251–256.
Article
13. Astrøm AN, Okullo I. Validity and reliability of the Oral Impacts on Daily performance (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross-sectional study of adolescents in Uganda. BMC Oral Health. 2003; 3:5–13.
Article
14. Usha GV, Thippeswamy HM, Nagesh L. Comparative assessment of validity and reliability of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross-sectional survey among adolescents in Davanagere city, Karnataka, India. Int J Dent Hyg. 2013; 11:28–34.
Article
15. Purohit BM, Singh A, Acharya S, Bhat M, Priya H. Assessment and validation of the Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) instrument among adults in Karnataka, South India. Community Dent Health. 2012; 29:203–208.
16. Astrøm AN, Haugejorden O, Skaret E, Trovik TA, Klock KS. Oral Impacts on Daily Performance in Norwegian adults: validity, reliability and prevalence estimates. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113:289–296.
Article
17. Srisilapanan P, Sheiham A. The prevalence of dental impacts on daily performances in older people in Northern Thailand. Gerodontology. 2001; 18:102–108.
Article
18. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ. Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994; 52:106–110.
Article
19. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. Patients' expectations and experiences of fixed orthodontic appliances therapy. Impact on quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:318–322.
Article
20. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod. 2004; 31:20–27.
Article
21. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69:285–300.
Article
22. Feu D, Miguel JA, Celeste RK, Oliveira BH. Effect of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83:892–898.
Article
23. Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:49–53.
Article
24. Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:127–132.
Article
25. Tung AW, Kiyak HA. Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113:29–39.
Article
26. Kiyak HA. Patients’ and parents’ expectations from early treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:Suppl 4. S50–S54.
Article
27. Petersen AC, Tobin-Richards M, Boxer A. Puberty: Its measurement and its meaning. J Early Adolesc. 1983; 3:47–62.
Article
28. Klima RJ, Wittemann JK, McIver JE. Body image, self-concept, and the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod. 1979; 75:507–516.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr