Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2019 Aug;52(4):195-204. 10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.4.195.
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Lobectomy versus Segmentectomy in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 2Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chkang@snu.ac.kr
- KMID: 2455145
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.4.195
Abstract
- Lobectomy is considered the standard strategy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, sublobar resection for NSCLC has recently received increased attention. The objective of this study was to compare 5-year survival, recurrence-free survival, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidities in patients who received segmentectomy versus those who received lobectomy through a meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were included and the combined hazard ratios or odds ratios were calculated. The results revealed that the 5-year survival rate after segmentectomy was comparable to that of lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC. However, segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC had lower rates of postoperative mortality and morbidities than lobectomy.
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer
- Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Segmentectomy
- Lobectomy versus Sublobar Resection in Non-Lepidic Small-Sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Radiographic alterations of postoperative chest after lung surgery
