J Korean Soc Radiol.  2019 May;80(3):477-489. 10.3348/jksr.2019.80.3.477.

Effectiveness and Influencing Factors of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Stenosis of Transposed Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistula

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea. intervention.kim@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (tBBAVF), and to analyze the factors influencing patency after PTA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In 101 patients who underwent operation for tBBAVF from January 2006 to February 2008, we identified 42 patients undergoing PTA. We conducted a retrospective analysis of sequential PTAs in these patients from 2006 to 2017.
RESULTS
A total of 100 PTAs were performed. The technical success rate was 93% and the clinical success was 100%. Only ruptures occurred in 12% as minor complications. Primary patency rate was 61%, 29%, 7%, and secondary patency was 91%, 82%, 59% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Primary patency rate was lower in tBBAVF with rupture (p = 0.024). Secondary patency rate was significantly lower in the diabetes (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION
Repetitive PTAs in tBBAVF are acceptable due to excellent secondary patency. Primary patency of tBBAVF is low in patients with rupture. Diabetes itself has a significant effect on secondary patency.


MeSH Terms

Angioplasty*
Arteriovenous Fistula*
Constriction, Pathologic*
Diabetes Mellitus
Humans
Retrospective Studies
Rupture
Vascular Patency

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Distribution of stenoses among all stenotic sites (n = 142).

  • Fig. 2 A 64-year-old man with technically successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A. Preprocedural fistulogram shows severe juxta-anastomotic stenosis in transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula. Stenotic site (arrow). B. A 6 mm × 80 mm balloon was used to treat this lesion. C. Stenosis was completely resolved after angioplasty without complication. Stenotic site (arrow).

  • Fig. 3 A 63-year-old woman who underwent a technically failed but clinically successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A. Preprocedural angiogram shows stenosis in the axillary vein in transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula. Stenotic site (arrow). B. A 5 mm × 20 mm cutting balloon was used to treat this lesion. C. Roadmap image after ballooning shows residual stenosis of about 50%. Stenotic site (arrow).

  • Fig. 4 Kaplan-Meier curves of postintervention primary and secondary patency for transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula.

  • Fig. 5 Postintervention primary patency for transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula with angioplasty-induced rupture and non-rupture (p = 0.024).

  • Fig. 6 Postintervention secondary patency for transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula with diabetes (p = 0.04). DM = diabetes mellitus.

  • Fig. 7 Postintervention primary patency according to location of stenotic site. Central vein stenosis showed borderline significant lower postintervention primary patency when compared with other stenotic sites in patients with a single stenotic site in transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (hazard ratio, 15.267; 95% confidence interval, 0.962 to 242.389; p = 0.053).


Reference

1. III. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37:S137–S181.
2. Dagher F, Gelber R, Ramos E, Sadler J. The use of basilic vein and brachial artery as an A-V fistula for long term hemodialysis. J Surg Res. 1976; 20:373–376.
Article
3. Oliver MJ, McCann RL, Indridason OS, Butterly DW, Schwab SJ. Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney Int. 2001; 60:1532–1539.
Article
4. Weale AR, Bevis P, Neary WD, Lear PA, Mitchell DC. A comparison between transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas and prosthetic brachioaxillary access grafts for vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46:997–1004.
Article
5. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Baudin S, Testou D, Abaza M, Dahdah G, et al. Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15:2029–2036.
6. Clark TW, Hirsch DA, Jindal KJ, Veugelers PJ, LeBlanc J. Outcome and prognostic factors of restenosis after percutaneous treatment of native hemodialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13:51–59.
Article
7. Rajan DK, Bunston S, Misra S, Pinto R, Lok CE. Dysfunctional autogenous hemodialysis fistulas: outcomes after angioplasty--are there clinical predictors of patency? Radiology. 2004; 232:508–515.
Article
8. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Bourquelot P. Interventional radiology in hemodialysis fistulae and grafts: a multidisciplinary approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002; 25:3–16.
Article
9. Glass C, Porter J, Singh M, Gillespie D, Young K, Illig K. A large-scale study of the upper arm basilic transposition for hemodialysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010; 24:85–91.
Article
10. Gilmore J. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations—2006 updates. Nephrol Nurs J. 2006; 33:487–488.
11. Neuen BL, Gunnarsson R, Baer RA, Tosenovsky P, Green SJ, Golledge J, et al. Factors associated with patency following angioplasty of hemodialysis fistulae. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25:1419–1426.
Article
12. Maeda K, Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Murata K. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistula dysfunction: technical success rate, patency rate and factors that influence the results. Eur J Radiol. 2005; 54:426–430.
Article
13. Heye S, Maleux G, Vaninbroukx J, Claes K, Kuypers D, Oyen R. Factors influencing technical success and outcome of percutaneous balloon angioplasty in de novo native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81:2298–2303.
Article
14. Simons ME, Clark TW, Rajan DK. The woggle technique: a new method of suture closure of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts and fistulas after percutaneous interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001; 12:S30.
15. Cohen MA, Kumpe DA, Durham JD, Zwerdlinger SC. Improved treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access sites with thrombolysis and angioplasty. Kidney Int. 1994; 46:1375–1380.
Article
16. Goo DE, Kim JH, Park ST, Chang YW, Kwon KH, Choi DL, et al. Usefulness of thromboaspiration with desilets-Hoffman sheath in thrombosed hemodialysis access graft. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2004; 51:45–53.
Article
17. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Rodrigue H, Brillet G, Lataste A, Pierre D, et al. Treatment of failed native arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis by interventional radiology. Kidney Int. 2000; 57:1124–1140.
Article
18. Gray RJ, Sacks D, Martin LG, Trerotola SO;. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14:S433–S442.
Article
19. Jeong SM, Kim JH, Byun SS, Kang JM, Choi ST, Kim JW, et al. Effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on the stenosis of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2016; 74:105–113.
Article
20. Trerotola SO, Kwak A, Clark TW, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Soulen MC, et al. Prospective study of balloon inflation pressures and other technical aspects of hemodialysis access angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005; 16:1613–1618.
Article
21. Manninen HI, Kaukanen ET, Ikäheimo R, Karhapää P, Lahtinen T, Matsi P, et al. Brachial arterial access: endovascular treatment of failing Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistulas—initial success and long-term results. Radiology. 2001; 218:711–718.
Article
22. Beathard GA. Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int. 1992; 42:1390–1397.
Article
23. Hodges TC, Fillinger MF, Zwolak RM, Walsh DB, Bech F, Cronenwett JL. Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: risk factors for failure. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 26:1009–1019.
24. Quinn SF, Schuman ES, Demlow TA, Standage BA, Ragsdale JW, Green GS, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus endovascular stent placement in the treatment of venous stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: intermediate results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995; 6:851–855.
Article
25. Funaki B, Szymski GX, Leef JA, Rosenblum JD, Burke R, Hackworth CA. Wallstent deployment to salvage dialysis graft thrombolysis complicated by venous rupture: early and intermediate results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169:1435–1437.
Article
26. Dale JD, Dolmatch BL, Duch JM, Winder R, Davidson IJ. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent treatment of angioplasty-related extravasation during hemodialysis access intervention: technical and 180-day patency. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21:322–326.
Article
27. Manninen HI, Kaukanen E, Mäkinen K, Karhapää P. Endovascular salvage of nonmaturing autogenous hemodialysis fistulas: comparison with endovascular therapy of failing mature fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19:870–876.
Article
28. Forauer AR, Hoffer EK, Homa K. Dialysis access venous stenoses: treatment with balloon angioplasty—1-versus 3-minute inflation times. Radiology. 2008; 249:375–381.
Full Text Links
  • JKSR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr