Investig Clin Urol.  2016 Nov;57(6):375-376. 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.375.

Current status of simulation-based training and assessment in urological robot-assisted surgery

• Song PH

• KMID: 2451395
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.375

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Humans
Learning Curve
Patient Care Team
Robotic Surgical Procedures/*education
Simulation Training/*trends
Urologic Surgical Procedures/*education

Reference

1. Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol. 2016; 69:1065–1080.

2. Aydin A, Raison N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2016; 13:503–519.

3. Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD, Yellamanchilli RK, Doherty GM, Gauger PG, et al. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2006; 243:854–860.

4. Patel A, Patel M, Lytle N, Toro JP, Medbery RL, Bluestein S, et al. Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice? Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:847–853.

5. Chowriappa A, Raza SJ, Fazili A, Field E, Malito C, Samarasekera D, et al. Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2015; 115:336–345.

6. Youssef RF, Spradling K, Yoon R, Dolan B, Chamberlin J, Okhunov Z, et al. Applications of three-dimensional printing technology in urological practice. BJU Int. 2015; 116:697–702.

7. Aydin A, Shafi AM, Shamim Khan M, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review. J Urol. 2016; 196:312–320.