Imaging Sci Dent.  2018 Dec;48(4):301-302. 10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.301.

The need for DICOM encapsulation of 3D scanning STL data

• Hwang JJ
• Jung YH
• Cho BH

• KMID: 2450172
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.301

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Radionuclide Imaging
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Stereolithography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Software
Technology, Radiologic
Electronic Data Processing
Radiology Information Systems

Reference

1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008; 204:505–511.

2. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17:149.

3. Mustra M, Delac K, Grgic M. Overview of the DICOM standard. In : 50th International Symposium ELMAR-2008; 2008 Sep 10–12; Zadar, Croatia. Berlin: Springer;2008. p. 39–44.

4. Schütze B, Kroll M, Geisbe T, Filler TJ. Patient data security in the DICOM standard. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 51:286–289.

5. Juneja M, Thakur N, Kumar D, Gupta A, Bajwa B, Jindal P. Accuracy in dental surgical guide fabrication using different 3-D printing techniques. Addit Manuf. 2018; 22:243–255.

6. Carneiro Júnior JT, de Moraes PH, de Oliveira DV, Carneiro NCM. Custom-made titanium miniplates associated with ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene graft in orthognathic surgery: an adjunct to maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 76:1091.e1–1091.e8.

7. Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W. Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016; 45:2–9.

8. Hiller JD, Lipson H. STL 2.0: a proposal for a universal multimaterial additive manufacturing file format [Internet]. Autstin: Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin;cited 2018 Oct 6. Available from: http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2009/2009-23-Hiller.pdf.

9. McHenry K, Bajcsy P. An overview of 3D data content, file formats and viewers. Urbana (IL): National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Image Spatial Data Analysis Group;2008. 10. 31. Report No.: isda08-002.

10. Bajcsy P, Kooper R, Marini L, McHenry K, Ondrejecek M. A framework for understanding file format conversions. In : Proceedings of the 2010 Roadmap for Digital Preservation Interoperability Framework Workshop; 2010 Mar 29-31; Gaithersburg, USA. New York: ACM;Artiocle No. 10.

11. Bathala LR, Rachuri NK, Rayapati SR, Kondaka S. Prosthodontics an “arsenal” in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016; 8:173.

12. DICOM Standards Committee (US). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine PS3.2 2018d: Conformance. Virginia: The Committee;2018. Avaliable from: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part02.html.

13. DICOM Standards Committee (US). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine PS3.3 2018d: Information Object Definitions. Virginia: The Committee;2018. Avaliable from: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part03.html.

14. Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont. 2014; 24:313–321.

15. Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent. (in press).

16. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137:1289–1296.

17. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Bosmans H, Schulze R. Future prospects for dental cone beam CT imaging. Imaging Med. 2012; 4:551–563.