Diabetes Metab J.  2018 Dec;42(6):480-487. 10.4093/dmj.2018.0018.

Frequency of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose during the School Day Is Associated with the Optimal Glycemic Control among Korean Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. anicca@inha.ac.kr
  • 2Diabetes Endocrinology Center, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Occupational & Evironmental Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Nursing, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels among Korean adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Factors affecting the SMBG frequency were analyzed in order to improve their glycemic control.
METHODS
Sixty-one adolescents aged 13 to 18 years with T1DM were included from one tertiary center. Clinical and biochemical variables were recorded. Factors associated with SMBG frequency were assessed using structured self-reported questionnaires.
RESULTS
Average total daily SMBG frequency was 3.8±2.1 and frequency during the school day was 1.3±1.2. The mean HbA1c level was 8.6%±1.4%. As the daily SMBG frequency increased, HbA1c levels declined (P=0.001). The adjusted odds of achieving the target HbA1c in participants who performed daily SMBG ≥5 significantly increased 9.87 folds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 61.70) compared with those performed SMBG four times a day. In the subjects whose SMBG frequency < 1/day during the school day, an 80% reduction in the adjusted odds ratio 0.2 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86) showed compared to the group with performing two SMBG measurements in the school setting. The number of SMBG testing performed at school was significantly high for individuals assisted by their friends (P=0.031) and for those who did SMBG in the classrooms (P=0.039).
CONCLUSION
Higher SMBG frequency was significantly associated with lower HbA1c in Korean adolescents with T1DM. It would be necessary to establish the school environments that can facilitate adequate glycemic control, including frequent SMBG.

Keyword

Adolescent; Blood glucose self-monitoring; Diabetes mellitus, type 1; Schools

MeSH Terms

Adolescent*
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Blood Glucose*
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Friends
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Humans
Odds Ratio
Blood Glucose

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Scatter plot for the relationship between the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. Linear regression test (β, −0.424; 95% confidence interval, −0.440 to −0.124; P=0.001).


Reference

1. Parkin CG, Davidson JA. Value of self-monitoring blood glucose pattern analysis in improving diabetes outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 3:500–508. PMID: 20144288.
Article
2. Karter AJ. Role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2006; 12(Suppl 1):110–117.
Article
3. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977–986. PMID: 8366922.
Article
4. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R. DPV-Wiss-Initiative. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011; 12:11–17. PMID: 20337978.
Article
5. Haller MJ, Stalvey MS, Silverstein JH. Predictors of control of diabetes: monitoring may be the key. J Pediatr. 2004; 144:660–661. PMID: 15127007.
Article
6. Levine BS, Anderson BJ, Butler DA, Antisdel JE, Brackett J, Laffel LM. Predictors of glycemic control and short-term adverse outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2001; 139:197–203. PMID: 11487743.
Article
7. Miller KM, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Goland RS, Haller MJ, McGill JB, Rodriguez H, Simmons JH, Hirsch IB. T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36:2009–2014. PMID: 23378621.
Article
8. Bui H, Perlman K, Daneman D. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in children and teens with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2005; 6:50–62. PMID: 15787901.
Article
9. Helgeson VS, Honcharuk E, Becker D, Escobar O, Siminerio L. A focus on blood glucose monitoring: relation to glycemic control and determinants of frequency. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011; 12:25–30. PMID: 20522169.
Article
10. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Ferrara A, Liu J, Selby JV. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001; 111:1–9. PMID: 11448654.
Article
11. Craig ME, Jones TW, Silink M, Ping YJ. Diabetes care, glycemic control, and complications in children with type 1 diabetes from Asia and the Western Pacific Region. J Diabetes Complications. 2007; 21:280–287. PMID: 17825751.
Article
12. Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, Greene SA, MacDonald TM, Newton RW. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Lancet. 1997; 350:1505–1510. PMID: 9388398.
13. Mortensen HB, Robertson KJ, Aanstoot HJ, Danne T, Holl RW, Hougaard P, Atchison JA, Chiarelli F, Daneman D, Dinesen B, Dorchy H, Garandeau P, Greene S, Hoey H, Kaprio EA, Kocova M, Martul P, Matsuura N, Schoenle EJ, Sovik O, Swift PG, Tsou RM, Vanelli M, Aman J. Insulin management and metabolic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence in 18 countries. Hvidore Study Group on Childhood Diabetes. Diabet Med. 1998; 15:752–759. PMID: 9737804.
14. Rewers MJ, Pillay K, de Beaufort C, Craig ME, Hanas R, Acerini CL, Maahs DM. International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014; 15(Suppl 20):102–114. PMID: 25182311.
15. Evans JM, Newton RW, Ruta DA, MacDonald TM, Stevenson RJ, Morris AD. Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database. BMJ. 1999; 319:83–86. PMID: 10398627.
Article
16. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan DM, Peterson CM. American Diabetes Association. Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(Suppl 1):s91–s93. PMID: 14693937.
Article
17. Smith CP, Williams AJ, Thomas JM, Archibald HR, Algar VD, Bottazzo GF, Gale EA, Savage MO. The pattern of basal and stimulated insulin responses to intravenous glucose in first degree relatives of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic children and unrelated adults aged 5 to 50 years. Diabetologia. 1988; 31:430–434. PMID: 3065105.
Article
18. Jin SM, Baek JH, Suh S, Jung CH, Lee WJ, Park CY, Yang HK, Cho JH, Lee BW, Kim JH. Factors associated with greater benefit of a national reimbursement policy for blood glucose test strips in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. J Diabetes Investig. 2018; 9:549–557.
Article
19. Jin SM, Kim JH. Management of adults with type 1 diabetes: current status and suggestions. J Korean Diabetes. 2014; 15:1–6.
Article
20. Dickinson JK, O'Reilly MM. The lived experience of adolescent females with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2004; 30:99–107. PMID: 14999898.
Article
21. Wang YL, Brown SA, Horner SD. The school-based lived experiences of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Nurs Res. 2013; 21:235–243. PMID: 24241272.
Article
22. Hains AA, Berlin KS, Davies WH, Parton EA, Alemzadeh R. Attributions of adolescents with type 1 diabetes in social situations: relationship with expected adherence, diabetes stress, and metabolic control. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29:818–822. PMID: 16567821.
23. Park SH, Kang HS, Hwang SY, Hwang SH, Shin Y, Lee JE. Insulin self-injection in school by children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 17:224–229.
Article
24. Vincze G, Barner JC, Lopez D. Factors associated with adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose among persons with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2004; 30:112–125. PMID: 14999899.
Article
25. Kang H, Ahn Y, Lee JE, Sohn M. School nurses' management for children and adolescents with diabetes. Child Health Nurs Res. 2015; 21:176–182.
Article
26. American Association of Diabetes Educators. Management of children with diabetes in the school setting. Diabetes Educ. 2014; 40:116–121. PMID: 24442102.
27. Pansier B, Schulz PJ. School-based diabetes interventions and their outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Public Health Res. 2015; 4:467. PMID: 25918699.
Article
28. Pendley JS, Kasmen LJ, Miller DL, Donze J, Swenson C, Reeves G. Peer and family support in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002; 27:429–438. PMID: 12058007.
Article
29. Bearman KJ, La Greca AM. Assessing friend support of adolescents' diabetes care: the diabetes social support questionnaire-friends version. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002; 27:417–428. PMID: 12058006.
Article
Full Text Links
  • DMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr