Anat Cell Biol.  2019 Mar;52(1):76-81. 10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.76.

The impacts of three-dimensional anatomical atlas on learning anatomy

• Park S
• Kim Y
• Park S
• Shin JA

• KMID: 2442332
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.76

Abstract

Gross anatomy has traditionally been the foundation of medical education. Medical students have learned the structure of the human body through dissection, lecture, and textbooks. As tablets and three-dimensional (3D) applications are developed, 3D atlas applications are utilized in learning anatomy by medical students. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impacts of 3D atlas applications on students' understanding of gross anatomy. This research was targeted at medical students taking the Anatomy and Embryology class in 2017 and 2018, at Ewha Womans University. The correlation between use of 3D atlas and student's results on the Anatomy and Embryology test was analyzed. An open-book anatomy quiz was also carried out to analyze the correlation between the type of atlas each student refers to and the results of the quiz. Independent t test between groups did not show statistically significant difference in the results of the Anatomy and Embryology test. However, the group referring to 3D atlas showed significantly higher results on the simple questions of the open-book anatomy quiz (P<0.05). In conclusion, 3D atlas is not very helpful in acquiring deep anatomical knowledge or memorizing the location of anatomical structures, but it can simply aid in the rapid identification of anatomical structures. Additionally, the 3D atlas will show good synergy with the two-dimensional atlas if used properly in anatomy education, because most students think it is useful to use the 3D atlas.

Keyword

3D atlas; Application; Anatomy; Medical education; Learning

MeSH Terms

Education
Education, Medical
Embryology
Female
Human Body
Humans
Learning*
Students, Medical
Tablets
Tablets

Reference

1. Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat. 1999; 12:55–65. PMID: 9890730.

2. Atlasi MA, Moravveji A, Nikzad H, Mehrabadi V, Naderian H. Learning styles and strategies preferences of Iranian medical students in gross anatomy courses and their correlations with gender. Anat Cell Biol. 2017; 50:255–260. PMID: 29354296.

3. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29:173–180. PMID: 17318286.

4. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3:83–93. PMID: 20205265.

5. Hoyek N, Collet C, Di Rienzo F, De Almeida M, Guillot A. Effectiveness of three-dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7:430–437. PMID: 24678034.

6. Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013; 6:211–215. PMID: 23509000.

7. Azer SA, Azer S. 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: a review of the quality of the literature. Health Prof Educ. 2016; 2:80–98.

8. Nicholson DT, Chalk C, Funnell WR, Daniel SJ. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ. 2006; 40:1081–1087. PMID: 17054617.

9. Hu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, Haase P, Doyle P, Fung K. Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 39:315–322. PMID: 20470679.

10. Beermann J, Tetzlaff R, Bruckner T, Schöebinger M, Müller-Stich BP, Gutt CN, Meinzer HP, Kadmon M, Fischer L. Three-dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy. Med Educ. 2010; 44:936–940. PMID: 20716104.

11. Hosapatna M, Ankolekar VH, Kotian SR, Souza AD, Souza AS. Impact of overall teaching program of anatomy in learning: a students perspective. Adv Sci Lett. 2017; 23:1826–1829.

12. Sawant SP, Rizvi S. Teaching anatomy to undergraduate students. Int J Anat Res. 2015; 3:1212–1215.

13. Tam MD, Hart AR, Williams S, Heylings D, Leinster S. Is learning anatomy facilitated by computer-aided learning? A review of the literature? Med Teach. 2009; 31:e393–e396. PMID: 19811174.

14. Murakami T, Tajika Y, Ueno H, Awata S, Hirasawa S, Sugimoto M, Kominato Y, Tsushima Y, Endo K, Yorifuji H. An integrated teaching method of gross anatomy and computed tomography radiology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7:438–449. PMID: 24443310.

15. Lewis TL, Burnett B, Tunstall RG, Abrahams PH. Complementing anatomy education using three-dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clin Anat. 2014; 27:313–320. PMID: 23661327.

16. Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30:13–16. PMID: 16481603.