Korean J Anesthesiol.  2019 Feb;72(1):24-31. 10.4097/kja.d.17.00081.

A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study comparing auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the assessment of double lumen tube position in elective thoracic surgeries involving one lung ventilation at a tertiary care cancer institute

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. swapnil.parab@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
As lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to identify regional lung ventilation and collapse, we hypothesize that LUS can be better than auscultation in assessing lung isolation and determining double lumen tube (DLT) position.
METHODS
A randomized controlled study was conducted in tertiary care cancer institute from November 2014 to December 2015, including 100 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgeries. Patients with tracheostomy, difficult airway and pleural-based pathologies were excluded. After anesthesia induction and DLT insertion, patients were randomized into group A (auscultation) and group B (LUS). Regional ventilation was assessed by experienced anesthesiologists using the respective method for each group. Final confirmation of DLT position with a bronchoscope was performed by a blinded anesthesiologist. Contingency tables were plotted to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for each method.
RESULTS
Data from 91 patients were analyzed (group A = 47, group B = 44). Compared with auscultation, LUS had significantly higher sensitivity (94.1% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.010), PPV (57.1% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.044), NPV (93.8% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.018), accuracy (70.5% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.036) and required longer median time (161.5 vs. 114 s, P < 0.001) for assessment of DLT position. Differences in specificity (55.6% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.101) and area under curve (0.748; 95% CI: 0.604-0.893 vs. 0.554, 95% CI: 0.379-0.730; P = 0.109) were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to auscultation, LUS is a superior method for assessing lung isolation and determining DLT position.

Keyword

Auscultation; Double lumen tube; Lung isolation; Lung ultrasound

MeSH Terms

Adult
Anesthesia
Area Under Curve
Auscultation*
Bronchoscopes
Double-Blind Method*
Humans
Lung*
Methods
One-Lung Ventilation*
Pathology
Prospective Studies*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tertiary Healthcare*
Tracheostomy
Ultrasonography*
Ventilation
Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr