Nucl Med Mol Imaging.  2018 Dec;52(6):438-444. 10.1007/s13139-018-0544-7.

FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging Methods in Cancer of Unknown Primary: an Approach to Overscanning

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey. nanoin@hotmail.com
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. karagozfiliz@yahoo.com, ebruyucesoy1@yahoo.com
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. dralaca2000@yahoo.com
  • 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. buralgonca@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) with conventional imaging methods (CIM), including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and mammography (MMG) in cancer of unknown primary (CUP).
METHODS
A total of 36 patients with CUP, who referred to our clinic for a FDG PET/CTscan, were enrolled in this study. Thirty of the patients were also examined through either diagnostic CT/MRI and/or MMG. The diagnostic performance of both methods for the primary cancer location was analyzed. The results of FDG PET/CT and CIM were compared based on the standard reference of the histopathology and/or clinical and laboratory follow-up.
RESULTS
The primary cancer locations were detected in 24 patients (66.6%, 24/36) by FDG PET/CT, whereas CIM identified the locations in 16 patients (53.3%, 16/30). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy rates of the detection of the primary tumor localizations were as follows: 83, 70, 89, 58, and 79% for FDG PET/CT; 70, 62, 84, 42, and 68% for CIM, respectively. There was no statistical significance between modalities regarding any of the categories in 30 patients.
CONCLUSION
FDG PET/CT detected the primary tumors of the patients with CUP more than CIM did. However, the difference between them was not found to be statistically significant. It may be considered that FDG PET/CT scan can be performed as a first-line tool in the initial diagnosis of the patients with CUP and to add radiodiagnostic imaging in selective cases.We conclude that if the first-line examination of a CUP patient has been already performed by a CIM and the result was negative or inconclusive, FDG PET/CT can be considered to avoid unnecessary imaging procedures.

Keyword

FDGPET/CT; Oncology; Cancer of unknown primary origin; CT; MRI

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mammography
Methods*
Positron-Emission Tomography
Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Full Text Links
  • NMMI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr