J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs.  2018 Dec;29(4):467-475. 10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.4.467.

Adherence to the Clean Intermittent Catheterization Following a Customized Intensive Education Program for Patients with Emptying Failure

Affiliations
  • 1Registered Nurse, Clean Intermittent Catheterization Center of Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul Doctoral Student, Community Health Nursing & Nursing Care Systems, Graduate School, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. lisook@snu.ac.kr
  • 3Professor, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Registered Nurse, Clean Intermittent Catheterization Center of Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Professor, Department of Nursing, Chungwoon University, Hongseong, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to investigate adherence to the clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and influencing factors on the adherence following a customized intensive education program (CIEP).
METHODS
This work is a retrospective descriptive study. The subjects were 226 emptying failure patients who learned in a CIEP from January 2012 to July 2014. The program developed in 2011 and consisted of 1) customized theoretical education; based on the results of urologic tests, underlying disease, or surgery of the patients, 2) hands-on practice until the trainees were able to master the techniques, 3) questions about the process of catheterization and what he/she needs to know. 4) at follow-up, the survey about adherence and barrier to CIC. Clinical characteristics; the level of satisfaction, understanding, and self-confidence; the barrier in medical records were reviewed.
RESULTS
The short-term adherence rate (median 22 days) is 87.6% and the long-term adherence rate (median 112 days) is 50.4%. The biggest obstacle is time management. The levels of satisfaction, understanding, and self-confidence are very high. The variable of Income is the only factor that has influence on adherence.
CONCLUSION
Despite the CIEP, the adherence rate is relatively low. In addition to the education, emotional and psychological supports and regular follow-up are needed to improve long-term adherence.

Keyword

Intermittent urethral catheterization; Education; Patient compliance

MeSH Terms

Catheterization
Catheters
Education*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intermittent Urethral Catheterization*
Medical Records
Patient Compliance
Retrospective Studies
Time Management

Reference

1. Morrison J, Birder L, Craggs M, Groat WD, Downie J, Drake M, et al. Neural control. In : Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Paris: Health Publications Ltd;2005. p. 363–422.
2. Harris CJ, Lemack GE. Neurourologic dysfunction: Evaluation, surveillance and therapy. Current Opinion in Urology. 2016; 26(4):290–294. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000290.
3. Yoshimura N, Chancellor MB. Differential diagnosis and treatment of impaired bladder emptying. Reviews in urology. 2004; 6 Suppl 1. S24–S31.
4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2002; 21(1):167–178. DOI: 10.1002/nau.10052.
5. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. The Journal of Urology. 1972; 107(3):458–461. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)61055-3.
Article
6. Shen L, Zheng X, Zhang C, Zeng B, Hou C. Influence of different urination methods on the urinary systems of patients with spinal cord injury. Journal of International Medical Research. 2012; 40(5):1949–1957. DOI: 10.1177/030006051204000536.
Article
7. Kessler TM, Ryu G, Burkhard FC. Clean intermittent self-catheterization: A burden for the patient? Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2009; 28(1):18–21. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20610.
Article
8. Wyndaele JJ, Maes D. Clean intermittent self-catheterization: A 12-year followup. The Journal of Urology. 1990; 143(5):906–908. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40132-7.
Article
9. Bahnson E, Mahdy A. Clean intermittent catheterization in the elderly. Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports. 2015; 10(4):376–380. DOI: 10.1007/s11884-015-0340-5.
Article
10. Girotti ME, MacCornick S, Perissé H, Batezini NS, Almeida FG. Determining the variables associated to clean intermittent selfcatheterization adherence rate: One-year follow-up study. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2011; 37(6):766–772. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-55382011000600013.
Article
11. Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, Sarma AV, Rodriguez GM, Clemens JQ. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. The Journal of Urology. 2010; 184(1):213–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.008.
Article
12. Afsar SI, Yemisci OU, Cosar SN, Cetin N. Compliance with CIC in spinal cord injury patients: A long-term follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51(8):645–649. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2013.46.
13. Perkash I, Giroux J. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: A follow up study. The Journal of Urology. 1993; 149(5):1068–1071. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36298-5.
14. Chartier-Kastler E, Amarenco G, Lindbo L, Soljanik I, Andersen HL, Bagi P, et al. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization. The Journal of Urology. 2013; 190(3):942–947. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.026.
Article
15. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. British Medical Journal. 2013; 346:e8639. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e8639.
Article
16. Oh SJ, Ku JH, Lim SH, Jeon HG, Son H. Effect of a ‘centralized intensive education system’ for clean intermittent self-catheterization in patients with voiding dysfunction who start catheterization for the first time. International Journal of Urology. 2006; 13(7):905–909. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01438.x.
Article
17. Cobussen-Boekhorst HJ, Kuppenveld Van JH, Verheij PP, Jong De LL, Gier De RR, Kortmann BB, et al. Teaching children clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) in a group setting. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2010; 6(3):288–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.09.002.
Article
18. Newman DK, Willson MM. Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices. Urologic Nursing. 2011; 31(1):12–28. DOI: 10.7257/1053-816X.2012.31.1.12.
Article
19. Logan K, Shaw C, Webber I, Samuel S, Broome L. Patients' experiences of learning clean intermittent self-catheterization: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 62(1):32–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04536.x.
Article
20. Van Achterberg T, Holleman G, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Arts R, Heesakkers J. Adherence to clean intermittent self-catheterization procedures: Determinants explored. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2008; 17(3):394–402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01893.x.
Article
21. Le Breton F, Guinet A, Verollet D, Jousse M, Amarenco G. Therapeutic education and intermittent self-catheterization: Recommendations for an educational program and a literature review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2012; 55(3):201–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.01.006.
Article
22. Neel KF, Salem MA, Soliman SM, Al-Hazmi H, Gomha AB, Khatab AA. Acceptance and compliance of clean intermittent catheterization among Saudi patients. Saudi Medical Journal. 2008; 29(7):1014–1017.
23. Parsons BA, Narshi A, Drake MJ. Success rates for learning intermittent self-catheterisation according to age and gender. International Urology and Nephrology. 2012; 44(4):1127–1131. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0136-x.
Article
24. Bolinger R, Engberg S. Barriers, complications, adherence, and self-reported quality of life for people using clean intermittent catheterization. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2013; 40(1):83–89. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182750117.
Article
25. Faure A, Peycelon M, Lallemant P, Audry G, Forin V. Pro and cons of transurethral self-catheterization in boys: A long-term teaching experience in a pediatric rehabilitation centre. Urology Journal. 2016; 13(2):2622–2628.
26. Motavasseli D, Chesnel C, Charlanes A, Menoux D, Charoenwong F, Le Breton F, et al. Adherence to anticholinergic therapy and clean intermittent self-catheterization in patients with multiple sclerosis. International Neurourology Journal. 2018; 22(2):133–141. DOI: 10.5213/inj.1836054.027.
Article
27. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983; 33(11):1444–1452.
Article
28. Shaw C, Logan K, Webber I, Broome L, Samuel S. Effect of clean intermittent self-catheterization on quality of life: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 61(6):641–650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04556.x.
Article
29. Wilde MH, Brasch J, Zhang Y. A qualitative descriptive study of self-management issues in people with long-term intermittent urinary catheters. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011; 67(6):1254–1263. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05583.x.
Article
30. Katz D, Tengekyon AJ, Kahan NR, Calderon-Margalit R. Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study. PloS one. 2018; 13(3):e0194409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194409.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKACHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr