J Korean Med Assoc.  2018 Aug;61(8):466-473. 10.5124/jkma.2018.61.8.466.

Trends in the of epidemiological perspectives on the causality of occupational diseases

• Myong JP
• Kim H
• Lee K
• Chang SH

• KMID: 2428821
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.8.466

Abstract

The main role of industrial accident compensation insurance is to protect injured workers and their families by providing various benefits. If a certain disease occurs due to work, the worker must prove the causal relationship between the work and the disease, although it is not easy for injured workers to do so. The epidemiological approach to causality is based on a comparison of the incidence rate in exposed and non-exposed groups. Recently, some arguments have been made regarding the application of epidemiological causality in litigation related to tobacco and some environmental-related diseases. The 3 main points of dispute are as follows: 1) the distinction between specific and non-specific diseases and causal inference, 2) the relative risk and the attributable fraction of the causative factor for the related disease, and 3) the application of population-level epidemiological study results to individual causation. Until now, the main approach to the causality of occupational diseases has been proximate causal relationships because of the practical difficulties in applying epidemiological causality to all events. As coverage under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act expands, the application of epidemiological causality must be considered, as well as the expansion of applicable occupational diseases. Moreover, doing that could provide enough evidence for managers and workers to take steps to prevent occupational disease. The safety net provided by industrial accident compensation insurance for protecting injured workers needs to be implemented on the basis of scientific evidence.

Keyword

Causality; Occupational diseases; Epidemiology

MeSH Terms

Accidents, Occupational
Compensation and Redress
Dissent and Disputes
Epidemiologic Studies
Epidemiology
Humans
Incidence
Insurance
Jurisprudence
Occupational Diseases*
Tobacco

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Inference process of epidemiological causality.

Reference

1. National Law Information Center. Revocation of disposition of non-payment on survivor's benefits and funeral expenses: Precedent 2005du8009 [Internet]. Seoul: National Law Information Center;2005. cited 2018 May 24. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/precInfoP.do?mode=0&evtNo=2005%EB%91%908009.

2. National Law Information Center. Revocation of disposition of disapproval on treatment benefit: Precedent 2006du4912 [Internet]. Seoul: National Law Information Center;2007. cited 2018 May 31. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/precInfoP.do?mode=0&evtNo=2006%EB%91%904912.

3. National Law Information Center. Revocation of disposition of disapproval on treatment benefit: Precedent 2006du8204 [Internet]. Seoul: National Law Information Center;2008. cited 2018 Jun 7. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/precInfoP.do?mode=0&evtNo=2006%EB%91%908204.

4. Ad-hoc Committee of the Korean Society for Preventive Medicine and the Korean Society of Epidemiology on Tobacco Lawsuits. Joint Statement of the Ad-hoc Committee of the Korean Society for Preventive Medicine and the Korean Society of Epidemiology on Tobacco Lawsuits on the causal link between tobacco smoking and lung cancer. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015; 48:119–131.

5. Khang YH. The causality between smoking and lung cancer among groups and individuals: addressing issues in tobacco litigation in South Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2015; 37:e2015026.

6. National Law Information Center. Tobacco litigation: Precedent 2011da22092 [Internet]. Seoul: National Law Information Center;2014. cited 2018 Jun 14. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/precInfoP.do?mode=0&precSeq=173296.

7. National Law Information Center. Indemnification for damage: Precedent 2006da17553 [Internet]. Seoul: National Law Information Center;2013. cited 2018 Jun 21. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/precInfoP.do?mode=0&precSeq=172027.

8. Park S, Jee SH, Shin HR, Park EH, Shin A, Jung KW, Hwang SS, Cha ES, Yun YH, Park SK, Boniol M, Boffetta P. Attributable fraction of tobacco smoking on cancer using population-based nationwide cancer incidence and mortality data in Korea. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:406.

9. Vyas MV, Garg AX, Iansavichus AV, Costella J, Donner A, Laugsand LE, Janszky I, Mrkobrada M, Parraga G, Hackam DG. Shift work and vascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012; 345:e4800.

10. Straif K. The burden of occupational cancer. Occup Environ Med. 2008; 65:787–788.

11. Siemiatycki J, Karp I, Sylvestre MP, Pintos J. Estimating the proportion of cases of lung cancer legally attributable to smoking: a novel approach for class actions against the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104:e60–e66.

12. Selikoff IJ, Hammond EC, Churg J. Asbestos exposure, smoking, and neoplasia. JAMA. 1968; 204:106–112.

13. Bianchi C, Brollo A, Ramani L, Zuch C. Asbestos exposure in lung carcinoma: a necropsy-based study of 414 cases. Am J Ind Med. 1999; 36:360–364.

14. Yu IJ, Choi JK, Kang SK, Chang HK, Chung YH, Han JH, Song KS, Lee YM, Chung HK. Potential source of asbestos in non-asbestos textile manufacturing company. Environ Int. 2002; 28:35–39.

15. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. Occupational relevance investigation protocol of occupational disease. Incheon: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute;2013.

16. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58:295–300.

17. Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO. Concept in cancer epidemiology and etiology. In : Adami HO, Hunter DJ, Trichopoulos D, editors. Textbook of cancer epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press;2008. p. 127–152.

18. Gordis L. From association to causation: deriving inferences from epidemiologic studies. In : Gordis L, editor. Epidemiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders;2009. p. 243–261.