Anat Cell Biol.  2015 Sep;48(3):153-169. 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153.

Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era

• Ghosh SK

• KMID: 2424818
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153

Abstract

The review article attempts to focus on the practice of human cadaveric dissection during its inception in ancient Greece in 3rd century BC, revival in medieval Italy at the beginning of 14th century and subsequent evolution in Europe and the United States of America over the centuries. The article highlights on the gradual change in attitude of religious authorities towards human dissection, the shift in the practice of human dissection being performed by barber surgeons to the anatomist himself dissecting the human body and the enactment of prominent legislations which proved to be crucial milestones during the course of the history of human cadaveric dissection. It particularly emphasizes on the different means of procuring human bodies which changed over the centuries in accordance with the increasing demand due to the rise in popularity of human dissection as a tool for teaching anatomy. Finally, it documents the rise of body donation programs as the source of human cadavers for anatomical dissection from the second half of the 20th century. Presently innovative measures are being introduced within the body donation programs by medical schools across the world to sensitize medical students such that they maintain a respectful, compassionate and empathetic attitude towards the human cadaver while dissecting the same. Human dissection is indispensable for a sound knowledge in anatomy which can ensure safe as well as efficient clinical practice and the human dissection lab could possibly be the ideal place to cultivate humanistic qualities among future physicians in the 21st century.

Keyword

Human dissection; De Liuzzi; Vesalius; Grave robbing; Anatomy Act; National socialist regime; Body donation; Uniform Anatomical Gift Act

MeSH Terms

Anatomists
Barber Surgeons
Cadaver*
Empathy
Europe
Dissection
Grave Robbing
Greece*
Human Body
Humans*
Italy
Legislation
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical
Teaching
United States

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 A woodcut illustration from Fasciculus medicinae (1491) depicting human dissection in medieval Italy. The anatomist (Lector) over viewing the dissection, which is being performed by a barber surgeon (Sector) under directions from the Ostensor, who is pointing to the part of the body to be dissected. Fasciculus medicinae was edited by Johannes de Ketham, a German physician who practiced in medieval Italy. Image in public domain.

• 

  Fig. 2 An anonymous engraving of an anatomical dissection session being conducted in full public view in the anatomical theatre in University of Leiden (the Netherlands) which was built in 1596. The illustration is based on a drawing by J.C. vant Woudt in 1609. Image in public domain.

• 

  Fig. 3 Andreas Vesalius undertaking an anatomical lecture in Padua. A notable shift from the prevalent trend in medieval Italy as he is dissecting the human body himself. He is referring to Galen's text (prevalent textbook in anatomy in those days) which is open by the side of the cadaver. Vesalius is surrounded by his students in Padua and the general public viewing the dissection from the gallery. Image in public domain.

• 

  Fig. 4 The anatomy lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp, official city anatomist of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons, drawn by Rembrandt in 1632. Anatomical dissection sessions were social events in those days being attended by students as well as the general public on payment of an entrance fee. All the spectators were properly dressed for a solemn social occasion. Image in public domain.

Reference

1. Magee R. Art macabre: resurrectionists and anatomists. ANZ J Surg. 2001; 71:377–380.

2. Yammine K. The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there? Teach Learn Med. 2014; 26:184–188.

3. Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2015; 8:45–52.

4. Sallam HN. The ancient Alexandria school of medicine. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2002; 30:3–10.

5. Serageldin I. Ancient Alexandria and the dawn of medical science. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2013; 2013:395–404.

6. Elizondo-Omaña RE, Guzmán-López S, García-Rodríguez Mde L. Dissection as a teaching tool: past, present, and future. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005; 285:11–15.

7. von Staden H. The discovery of the body: human dissection and its cultural contexts in ancient Greece. Yale J Biol Med. 1992; 65:223–241.

8. Fraser PM. Ptolemaic Alexandria. Oxford: Clarendon Press;1972.

9. Mavrodi A, Paraskevas G. Mondino de Luzzi: a luminous figure in the darkness of the Middle Ages. Croat Med J. 2014; 55:50–53.

10. Gregory SR, Cole TR. MSJAMA. The changing role of dissection in medical education. JAMA. 2002; 287:1180–1181.

11. Rengachary SS, Colen C, Dass K, Guthikonda M. Development of anatomic science in the late middle ages: the roles played by Mondino de Liuzzi and Guido da Vigevano. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65:787–793.

12. Siraisi NG. Medieval and early Renaissance medicine: an introduction to knowledge and practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press;1990.

13. Aufderheide AC. The scientific study of mummies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2003.

14. Somerville R. Pope Alexander III and the Council of Tours (1163): a study of ecclesiastical politics and institutions in the twelfth century. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press;1977.

15. Persaud TV. Early history of human anatomy: from antiquity to the beginning of the modern era. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas;1984.

16. Prioreschi P. Determinants of the revival of dissection of the human body in the Middle Ages. Med Hypotheses. 2001; 56:229–234.

17. Park K. The criminal and the saintly body: autopsy and dissection in Renaissance Italy. Renaiss Q. 1994; 47:1–33.

18. Pilcher LS. The Mondino myth. Med Library Hist J. 1906; 4:311–331.

19. Walsh JJ. The popes and the history of anatomy. Med Library Hist J. 1904; 2:10–28.

20. Infusino MH, Win D, O'Neill YV. Mondino's book and the human body. Vesalius. 1995; 1:71–76.

21. Ferrari G. Public anatomy lessons and the carnival: the anatomy theatre of Bologna. Past Present. 1987; (117):50–106.

22. Joffe SN. Andreas Vesalius: the making, the madman, and the myth. Osborne Park: Persona Publishing;2009.

23. Park K. That the medieval church prohibited human dissection. In : Numbers RL, editor. Galileo Goes to Jail: And Other Myths about Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;2009. p. 43–49.

24. Joutsivuo T. Vesalius and De humani corporis fabrica: Galen's errors and the change of anatomy in the sixteenth century. Hippokrates (Helsinki). 1997; 98–112.

25. Premuda L. Storia dell'iconografia anatomica: con un'appendice di Gaetano Ottaviani. Milano: Aldo Martello Editore;1957.

26. Park K. The life of the corpse: division and dissection in late medieval Europe. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1995; 50:111–132.

27. French R. Dissection and vivisection in the European Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate;1999.

28. Huff TE. The rise of early modern science: Islam, China and the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2003.

29. Sellmer R. Anatomy during the Italian Renaissance: a brief history of how artists influenced its development. In : Whitelaw WA, editor. The Proceedings of the 10th Annual History of Medicine Days. Calgary: Alberta Faculty of Medicine, The University of Calgary;2001. p. 341.

30. Cazort M, Kornell M, Roberts KB. The ingenious machine of nature: four centuries of art and anatomy. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada;1996.

31. O'Malley CD. History of medical education: an international symposium held February 5-9, 1968. 673. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press;1996.

32. Frati P, Frati A, Salvati M, Marinozzi S, Frati R, Angeletti LR, Piccirilli M, Gaudio E, Delfini R. Neuroanatomy and cadaver dissection in Italy: History, medicolegal issues, and neurosurgical perspectives. J Neurosurg. 2006; 105:789–796.

33. Mavrodi A, Paraskevas G, Kitsoulis P. The history and the art of anatomy: a source of inspiration even nowadays. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2013; 118:267–276.

34. Grendler PF. The universities of the Italian Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press;2002. p. 616.

35. Vesalius A. De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem. Basilea: Officina Ioannis Oporini;1543.

36. Ball P. The devil's doctor: Paracelsus and the world of Renaissance magic and science. New York: Random House Publishing;2014. p. 67.

37. Shotwell RA. The revival of vivisection in the sixteenth century. J Hist Biol. 2012; 46:171–197.

38. Daynes-Diallo S. A touch of France: theory and practice: European Renaissance medicine. Medicographia. 2011; 33:334–343.

39. Pilcher JE. Guy de Chauliac and Henri de Mondeville,-A Surgical Retrospect. Ann Surg. 1895; 21:84–102.

40. Thevenet A. Guy de Chauliac (1300-1370): the "father of surgery". Ann Vasc Surg. 1993; 7:208–212.

41. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2010.

42. Brim OG Jr, Freeman HE, Levine S, Scotch NA. The dying patient. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers;1980.

43. Singh AK. Modern world system and Indian proto-industrialization: Bengal 1650-1800. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre;2006. p. 296.

44. Holomanova A, Ivanova A, Brucknerova I, Benuska J. Andreas Vesalius: the reformer of anatomy. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001; 102:48–54.

45. Tubbs RS, Linganna S, Loukas M. Jacobus Sylvius (1478-1555): physician, teacher, and anatomist. Clin Anat. 2007; 20:868–870.

46. Drizenko A. The Anatomy Institutions of Jean Guinter d'Andernach (1487-1574), and Andre Vesale (1514-1564). Hist Sci Med. 2011; 45:321–328.

47. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002; 269:20–32.

48. Adler RE. Medical firsts: from Hippocrates to the human genome. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons;2004.

49. MacDonald H. Human remains: dissection and its histories. London: Yale University;2005.

50. Goodrich JT. Andreas Vesalius and anatomy: a re-evaluation of his efforts. Hist Sci Med. 1982; 17:13–16.

51. Ghosh SK. Evolution of illustrations in anatomy: a study from the classical period in Europe to modern times. Anat Sci Educ. 2015; 8:175–188.

52. Mitchell PD, Boston C, Chamberlain AT, Chaplin S, Chauhan V, Evans J, Fowler L, Powers N, Walker D, Webb H, Witkin A. The study of anatomy in England from 1700 to the early 20th century. J Anat. 2011; 219:91–99.

53. Mitchell PD. Anatomical dissection in Enlightenment Britain and beyond: autopsy, pathology and display. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.;2012.

54. Ferm V. Pictorial History of Protestantism. New York: Philosophical Library;1957.

55. Robinson JO. The barber-surgeons of London. Arch Surg. 1984; 119:1171–1175.

56. Alberti F. Anatomy in London. Anatomic teaching in London and John CAIUS, student of the Padua School before Harvey. Minerva Med. 1961; 52:Varia 1893–1896.

57. Payne L. "With much nausea, loathing, and foetor": William Harvey, dissection, and dispassion in early modern medicine. Vesalius. 2002; 8:45–52.

58. Gregory A. Harvey's hear: the discovery of blood circulation. Cambridge: Icon Books;2001.

59. Sanders MA. William Cheselden: anatomist, surgeon, and medical illustrator. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24:2282–2289.

60. Fielding S. The executioner's bible: the story of every British hangman of the twentieth century. London: John Blake Publishing;2008.

61. Richardson R. Death, dissection and the destitute. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul;1987.

62. Park K. Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. New York: Zone Books;2006. p. 15.

63. Hildebrandt S. Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clin Anat. 2008; 21:5–14.

64. Sappol M. A traffic of dead bodies: anatomy and embodied social identity in nineteenth-century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press;2002. p. 102.

65. Stukenbrock K. Unter dem Primat der Okonomie? Soziale und wirtschaftliche Randbedingungen der Leichenbeschaffung fuer die Anatomie. In : Helm J, Stukenbrock K, editors. Anatomie: Sektionen einer Medizinischen Wissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag;2003. p. 227–239.

66. Hutton F. The study of anatomy in Britain, 1700-1900: the body, gender and culture. London: Pickering & Chatto Ltd.;2013.

67. Humphries E. Murder, mortsafes and Moir: a medical student looks at anatomy teaching in Aberdeen. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2014; 44:67–71.

68. Halperin EC. The poor, the Black, and the marginalized as the source of cadavers in United States anatomical education. Clin Anat. 2007; 20:489–495.

69. Linebaugh P. The Tyburn riot against the surgeons. In : Hay D, Linebaugh P, Rule JG, Thompson EP, Winstow C, editors. Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England. London: Penguin;1975. p. 65–117.

70. Rosner L. The anatomy murders: being the true and spectacular history of Edinburgh's notorious Burke and Hare and of the man of science who abetted them in the commission of their most heinous crimes. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press;2011.

71. Wise S. The Italian boy: a tale of murder and body snatching in 1830s London. New York: Metropolitan Books;2004.

72. Moore W. The knife man: blood, body snatching, and the birth of modern surgery. Portland, OR: Broadway Books;2006. p. 354.

73. Persaud TV. A history of anatomy: The Post-Vesalian Era. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas;1997.

74. Hurren ET. Protesting about Pauperism: poverty, politics and poor relief in Late Victorian England 1870-1900. Woodbridge: Boydell Press;2007.

75. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Speaking for the dead: the human body in biology and medicine. 2nd ed. Farnham: Ashgate;2009.

76. MacDonald HP. Possessing the dead: the artful science of anatomy. Carlton: Melbourne University Press;2010.

77. Jones DG, Fennell S. Bequests, cadavers and dissections: sketches from New Zealand history. N Z Med J. 1991; 104:210–212.

78. Jones DG. The anatomy museum and mental illness: the centrality of informed consent. In : Coleborne C, MacKinnon D, editors. Exhibiting Madness in Museums: Remembering Psychiatry through Collection and Display. New York: Routledge;2011. p. 161–177.

79. Savitt TL. Medicine and slavery: the diseases and health care of blacks in Antebellum Virginia. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press;1978.

80. Hildebrandt S. First symposium on "Anatomie im National-sozialismus" ("Anatomy in National Socialism"), Wurzburg, Germany, September 29, 2010. Clin Anat. 2011; 24:97–100.

81. Kaiser S. Tradition or change? Sources of body procurement for the Anatomical Institute of the University of Cologne in the Third Reich. J Anat. 2013; 223:410–418.

82. Redies C, Viebig M, Zimmermann S, Fröber R. Origin of corpses received by the anatomical institute at the University of Jena during the Nazi regime. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005; 285:6–10.

83. Hulkower R. From sacrilege to privilege: the tale of body procurement for anatomical dissection in the United States. Einstein J Biol Med. 2011; 27:23–26.

84. Tward AD, Patterson HA. MSJAMA. From grave robbing to gifting: cadaver supply in the United States. JAMA. 2002; 287:1183.

85. Humphrey DC. Dissection and discrimination: the social origins of cadavers in America, 1760-1915. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1973; 49:819–827.

86. Garment A, Lederer S, Rogers N, Boult L. Let the dead teach the living: the rise of body bequeathal in 20th-century America. Acad Med. 2007; 82:1000–1005.

87. Weinmann GH. A survey of the law concerning dead human bodies. Bulletin No. 73. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences;1929. p. 68–72.

88. Dalley AF, Driscoll RE, Settles HE. The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act: what every clinical anatomist should know. Clin Anat. 1993; 6:247–254.

89. Greene JR. Effects of detailed information about dissection on intentions to bequeath bodies for use in teaching and research. J Anat. 2003; 202:475–477.

90. Taylor SJ, Wilson DJ. The Human Tissue Act (2004), anatomical examination and the importance of body donation in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 2007; 76:124–126.

91. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu AR, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud MM, Laforet E, Riedere BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate-Oliver F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ. The legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe: a review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat. 2008; 12:1–24.

92. Warner JH, Rizzolo LJ. Anatomical instruction and training for professionalism from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Clin Anat. 2006; 19:403–414.

93. Zhang L, Xiao M, Gu M, Zhang Y, Jin J, Ding J. An overview of the roles and responsibilities of Chinese medical colleges in body donation programs. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7:312–320.

94. Park JT, Jang Y, Park MS, Pae C, Park J, Hu KS, Park JS, Han SH, Koh KS, Kim HJ. The trend of body donation for education based on Korean social and religious culture. Anat Sci Educ. 2011; 4:33–38.

95. McClea K, Stringer MD. The profile of body donors at the Otago School of Medical Sciences: has it changed? N Z Med J. 2010; 123:9–17.

96. Alexander M, Marten M, Stewart E, Serafin S, Štrkalj G. Attitudes of Australian chiropractic students toward whole body donation: a cross-sectional study. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7:117–123.

97. Agthong S, Wiwanitkit V. Cadaver donation: a retrospective review at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2002; 33:Suppl 3. 166–167.

98. Kozai T. History of collecting cadavers in Japan. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2007; 82:33–36.

99. Sato T. Process of development of body donation law in Japan. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2007; 82:63–71.

100. Rokade SA, Gaikawad AP. Body donation in India: social awareness, willingness, and associated factors. Anat Sci Educ. 2012; 5:83–89.

101. Ajita R, Singh I. Body donation and its relevance in anatomy learning: a review. J Anat Soc India. 2007; 56:44–47.

102. Appaji AC, Kulkarni R. A survey on the role and the status of cadavers in medical education: an Indian scenario. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012; 6:1132–1136.

103. Anyanwu EG, Obikili EN. Dissecting the dissectors: knowledge, attitude, and practice of body bequests by Nigerian anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2012; 5:347–353.

104. Kramer B, Hutchinson EF. Transformation of a cadaver population: Analysis of a South African cadaver program, 1921-2013. Anat Sci Educ. 2015; 8:445–451.

105. Sehirli US, Saka E, Sarikaya O. Attitudes of Turkish anatomists toward cadaver donation. Clin Anat. 2004; 17:677–681.

106. Halou H, Chalkias A, Mystrioti D, Iacovidou N, Vasileiou PV, Xanthos T. Evaluation of the willingness for cadaveric donation in Greece: a population-based study. Anat Sci Educ. 2013; 6:48–55.

107. Ramsey-Stewart G, Burgess AW, Hill DA. Back to the future: teaching anatomy by whole-body dissection. Med J Aust. 2010; 193:668–671.

108. Lempp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ. 2005; 39:318–325.

109. Robbins BD, Tomaka A, Innus C, Patterson J, Styn G. Lessons from the dead: the experiences of undergraduates working with cadavers. Omega (Westport). 2008; 58:177–192.

110. Rizzolo LJ. Human dissection: an approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat Rec. 2002; 269:242–248.

111. Bergman EM, de Bruin AB, Herrler A, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:152.

112. Bergman EM, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, Van der Vleuten CP, De Bruin AB. Influences on anatomical knowledge: The complete arguments. Clin Anat. 2014; 27:296–303.

113. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29:173–180.

114. Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Viewpoint: exploring the human interior: the roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Acad Med. 2005; 80:745–749.

115. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon. 2004; 2:79–90.

116. Mavrodi A, Paraskevas G. Evolution of the paranasal sinuses' anatomy through the ages. Anat Cell Biol. 2013; 46:235–238.

117. Crow SM, O'Donoghue D, Vannatta JB, Thompson BM. Meeting the family: promoting humanism in gross anatomy. Teach Learn Med. 2012; 24:49–54.

118. Talarico EF Jr. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat. 2013; 26:161–172.

119. Halpern J. From detached concern to empathy: humanizing medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press;2001.

120. Korf HW, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans JP, Paulsen F, Rune G, Baumgart-Vogt E. The dissection course: necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat. 2008; 190:16–22.