J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2018 Sep;34(3):167-174. 10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.167.

Retrospective radiographic and clinical analysis of implant survival placed after alveolar ridge preservation

• Lee SJ
• Jang H
• Shin HS
• Park JC
• Song YG
• Cho IW

• KMID: 2422635
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.167

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of present study was to retrospectively analyze the survival rate of implant placed after alveolar ridge preservation by initial stability and radiographic measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In total, 19 patients who received 21 sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) implants were enrolled in this retrospective study. Implants placed after alveolar ridge preservation technique (ARP) 2 - 3 months healing period, Periotest value (PTV) measured at implant placement and before placed prosthodontics. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured at implant placement and final recall check.
RESULTS
Overall survival rate of implant was 100%. Mean PTV at implant placement was −0.06 ± 8.33 and mean PTV before placed prosthodontics was −5.75 ± 1.72. The range of MBL change was from −0.55 mm to 1.6 mm (Mean: 0.19 ± 0.58 mm).
CONCLUSION
The findings of present study suggest that the implant paced after alveolar ridge preservation appear high survival rates and stable MBL.

Keyword

alveolar process; alveolar ridge augmentation; dental implants; osseointegration; survival rate

MeSH Terms

Alveolar Process*
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Dental Implants
Humans
Osseointegration
Prosthodontics
Retrospective Studies*
Survival Rate
Dental Implants

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Diagrams illustrating the average of mesial-distal marginal bone level of all implants. The marginal bone level was measured at fixture insertion (0 month), and at final recall (final months). Red lines mean increasing of marginal bone levels.

• 

  Fig. 2 Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change of implants which placed in ARP site (Increased MBL after loading). (A) Radiographic image of case 1 (After implant placement), (B) Final recall check of case 1 (21 months later), (C) Radiographic image of case 2 (After implant placement), (D) Final recall check of case 2 (14 months later), (E) Radiographic image of case 3 (After implant placement), (F) Final recall check of case 3 (21 months later). The images cropped from panoramic view.

• 

  Fig. 3 Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change of implants which placed in ARP site (Decreased or same MBL after loading). (A) Radiographic image of case 4 (After implant placement), (B) Final recall check of case 4 (24 months later), (C) Radiographic image of case 5 (After implant placement), (D) Final recall check of case 5 (18 months later), (E) Radiographic image of case 6 (After implant placement), (F) Final recall check of case 6 (16 months later). The images cropped from panoramic view.

Reference

References

1. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction:a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23:313–23. PMID: 12956475.

2. Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans:a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22:779–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x. PMID: 21091540.

3. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations:a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(Suppl 4):113–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x. PMID: 19663958.

4. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23(Suppl 5):22–38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.x. PMID: 22211304.

5. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction:a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:950–8. DOI: 10.1177/0022034514541127. PMID: 24966231. PMCID: PMC4293706.

6. MacBeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, Mardas N. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation:a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28:982–1004. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12911. PMID: 27458031.

7. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing:what can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 2015; 68:122–34. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12082. PMID: 25867983.

8. Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes:a systematic review:Group 4:Therapeutic concepts &methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(Suppl 11):180–201. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12639. PMID: 26078004.

9. Corrente G, Abundo R, Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G, Martuscelli G. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants in regenerated and nonregenerated bone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20:390–7. PMID: 11203579.

10. Nevins M, Mellonig JT, Clem DS 3rd, Reiser GM, Buser DA. Implants in regenerated bone:longterm survival. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998; 18:34–45. PMID: 9558555.

11. Chavez H, Ortman LF, DeFranco RL, Medige J. Assessment of oral implant mobility. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70:421–6. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90078-3. PMID: 8254544.

12. Olivé J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5:390–400. PMID: 2094658.

13. Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture:a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016; 46:415–25. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.415. PMID: 28050319. PMCID: PMC5200867.

14. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990; 1:33–40. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x. PMID: 2099210.

15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8:161–72. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x. PMID: 9586460.

16. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13:153–61. DOI: 10.1177/08959374990130010501. PMID: 11276738.

17. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets:an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:645–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x. PMID: 15882225.

18. Blanco J, Liñares A, Pérez J, Muñoz F. Ridge alterations following flapless immediate implant placement with or without immediate loading. Part II:a histometric study in the Beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:762–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01747.x. PMID: 21752045.

19. Becker W, Becker BE, Caffesse R. A comparison of demineralized freeze-dried bone and autologous bone to induce bone formation in human extraction sockets. J Periodontol. 1994; 65:1128–33. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.12.1128. PMID: 7877084.

20. Froum S, Cho SC, Rosenberg E, Rohrer M, Tarnow D. Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft:a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:94–102. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.94. PMID: 11846205.

21. Serino G, Biancu S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Ridge pres-ervation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler:a clinical and histological study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:651–8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x. PMID: 12969370.

22. Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26:19–29. DOI: 10.1308/135576106777795653. PMID: 16515093.

23. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1:histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 2000; 71:1015–23. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.1015. PMID: 10914806.

24. Becker W, Becker BE. Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences:surgical techniques and case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990; 10:376–91. PMID: 2098360.

25. Rosenquist B. A comparison of various methods of soft tissue management following the immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12:43–51. PMID: 9048453.

26. Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hammerle CH. Postextraction tissue management:a soft tissue punch technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24:545–53. PMID: 15626317.

27. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge:a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28:469–77. PMID: 18990998.

28. Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure:a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2011; 82:377–87. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090342. PMID: 21043792.

29. Choi HK, Cho HY, Lee SJ, Cho IW, Shin HS, Koo KT, Lim HC, Park JC. Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017; 47:372–80. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.372. PMID: 29333323. PMCID: PMC5764763.

30. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane:a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32:421–30. PMID: 22577648.

31. Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hammerle CHF, Wu H, Hu XL, Lin Y. Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation:A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:522–9. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13149. PMID: 29607553.

32. Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Carrel JP, Belser UC. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42:20110429. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20110429. PMID: 23360688. PMCID: PMC3699017.