Yonsei Med J.  2017 Jul;58(4):823-828. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.823.

A Combination of Short and Simple Surfactant Protein B and C Analogues as a New Synthetic Surfactant: In Vitro and Animal Experiments

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. baecw@khnmc.or.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Pulmonary surfactants for preterm infants contain mostly animal-derived surfactant proteins (SPs), which are essential for lowering surface tension. We prepared artificial pulmonary surfactants using synthetic human SP analogs and performed in vitro and in vivo experiments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We synthesized peptide analogues that resemble human SP-B (RMLPQLVCRLVLRCSMD) and SP-C (CPVHLKRLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL). Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and palmitic acid (PA) were added and mixed in lyophilized to render powdered surfactant. Synsurf-1 was composed of DPPC:PG:PA:SP-B (75:25:10:3, w/w); Synsurf-2 was composed of DPPC:PG:PA:SP-C (75:25:10:3, w/w); and Synsurf-3 was composed of DPPC:PG:PA:SP-B:SP-C (75:25:10:3:3, w/w). We performed in vitro study to compare the physical characteristics using pulsating bubble surfactometer and modified Wilhelmy balance test. Surface spreading and adsorption test of the surfactant preparations were measured. In vivo test was performed using term and preterm rabbit pups. Pressure-volume curves were generated during the deflation phase. Histologic findings were examined.
RESULTS
Pulsating bubble surfactometer readings revealed following minimum and maximum surface tension (mN/m) at 5 minutes: Surfacten® (5.5±0.4, 32.8±1.6), Synsurf-1 (16.7±0.6, 28.7±1.5), Synsurf-2 (7.9±1.0, 33.1±1.6), and Synsurf-3 (7.1±0.8, 34.5±1.0). Surface spreading rates were as follows: Surfacten® (27 mN/m), Synsurf-1 (43 mN/m), Synsurf-2 (27 mN/m), and Synsurf-3 (27 mN/m). Surface adsorption rate results were as follows: Surfacten® (28 mN/m), Synsurf-1 (35 mN/m), Synsurf-2 (29 mN/m), and Synsurf-3 (27 mN/m). The deflation curves were best for Synsurf-3; those for Synsurf-2 were better than those for Surfacten®. Synsurf-1 was the worst surfactant preparation. Microscopic examination showed the largest aerated area of the alveoli in the Synsurf-3 group, followed by Synsurf-1 and Surfacten®; Synsurf-2 was the smallest.
CONCLUSION
Synsurf-3 containing both SP-B and SP-C synthetic analogs showed comparable and better efficacy than commercially used Surfacten® in lowering surface tension, pressure-volume curves, and tissue aerated area of the alveoli.

Keyword

Pulmonary surfactants; pulmonary surfactant-associated proteins; respiratory distress syndrome; newborn; synthetic surfactant

MeSH Terms

Animals
Animals, Newborn
Birth Weight
Emulsions
Humans
Lung/drug effects
Pressure
Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein B/*pharmacology
Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein C/*pharmacology
Rabbits
Surface Properties
Emulsions
Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein B
Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein C

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Diagrams generated by modified Wilhelmy balance test. (A) Surface spreading rate test. Synsurf-1 was slow. Synsurf-2 and -3 and Surfacten® were similarly fast in regards to surface spreading rate test. (B) Surface adsorption was best for Synsurf-3, followed by Surfacten®, Synsurf-2, and Synsurf-1 in that order. (C) In surface tension area diagram, all four preparations showed hysteresis curves. Among these, Surfacten® showed the lowest minimum-ST, which was the best. Synsurf-2 and -3 showed similarly in the middle and Synsurf-1 was the worst. ST, surface tension.

  • Fig. 2 Pressure volume curves. (A) shows the difference between term (n=9) and preterm controls (n=13, p<0.001). (B) shows deflation curves for the four different surfactant preparations. Synsurf-2 (n=7, p=0.0068), Synsurf-3 (n=6, p=0.0031), and Surfacten® (n=18, p<0.001) showed higher pressure volume curves in the term group than the preterm group; Synsurf-1 (n=6, p=0.4811) showed no difference. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare volumes at 15 cm H2O pressure.

  • Fig. 3 Histologic differences among six groups (hematoxylin and eosin stain, ×100). Four surfactant preparations-treated lung tissues demonstrated better aerated features than preterm controls. For statistical analysis, alveolar areas were compared which and revealed significant differences, as shown in Fig. 4.

  • Fig. 4 Aerated area percent comparison. Tissues treated with Sufacten® (n=34), Synsurf-1 (n=24), Synsurf-2 (n=31), and Synsurf-3 (n=30), demonstrated significantly higher aerated area rate than controls (n=49, p<0.001). Synsurf-3 was significantly higher than Surfactant® (p=0.020), while Synsurf-1 and Synsurf-2 were not different from Surfactant ’ (p=0.729 and 0.722). Unpaired t-test was used.


Cited by  1 articles

History of Pulmonary Surfactant Replacement Therapy for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Korea
Chong-Woo Bae, Chae Young Kim, Sung-Hoon Chung, Yong-Sung Choi
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(25):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e175.


Reference

1. Jobe AH, Hillman N, Polglase G, Kramer BW, Kallapur S, Pillow J. Injury and inflammation from resuscitation of the preterm infant. Neonatology. 2008; 94:190–196. PMID: 18832854.
Article
2. Miedema M, de Jongh FH, Frerichs I, van Veenendaal MB, van Kaam AH. Changes in lung volume and ventilation during surfactant treatment in ventilated preterm infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 184:100–105. PMID: 21493733.
Article
3. Fujiwara T, Maeta H, Chida S, Morita T, Watabe Y, Abe T. Artificial surfactant therapy in hyaline-membrane disease. Lancet. 1980; 1:55–59. PMID: 6101413.
Article
4. Soll R, Ozek E. Multiple versus single doses of exogenous surfactant for the prevention or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1):CD000141. PMID: 19160177.
Article
5. Kim SM, Park YJ, Chung SH, Choi YS, Kim CH, Bae CW. Early prophylactic versus late selective use of surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome in very preterm infants: a collaborative study of 53 multi-center trials in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29:1126–1131. PMID: 25120324.
Article
6. Zhu Y, Miller TL, Chidekel A, Shaffer TH. KL4-surfactant (Lucinactant) protects human airway epithelium from hyperoxia. Pediatr Res. 2008; 64:154–158. PMID: 18391844.
Article
7. Moya F, Sinha S, Gadzinowski J, D'Agostino R, Segal R, Guardia C, et al. One-year follow-up of very preterm infants who received lucinactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: results from 2 multicenter randomized, controlled trials. Pediatrics. 2007; 119:e1361–e1370. PMID: 17533176.
Article
8. Lu KW, Taeusch HW. Combined effects of polymers and KL(4) peptide on surface activity of pulmonary surfactant lipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1798:1129–1134. PMID: 20188696.
Article
9. Soll RF, Blanco F. Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (2):CD000144. PMID: 11405951.
Article
10. Kallberg Y, Gustafsson M, Persson B, Thyberg J, Johansson J. Prediction of amyloid fibril-forming proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:12945–12950. PMID: 11134035.
Article
11. Robertson B, van Golde LMG. Pulmonary surfactant: from molecular biology to clinical practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers;1992. p. 561–592.
12. Moya F. Synthetic surfactants: where are we? Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Perinatol. 2009; 29(Suppl 2):S23–S28. PMID: 19399006.
Article
13. Seger N, Soll R. Animal derived surfactant extract for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (2):CD007836. PMID: 19370695.
Article
14. Walther FJ, Waring AJ, Sherman MA, Zasadzinski JA, Gordon LM. Hydrophobic surfactant proteins and their analogues. Neonatology. 2007; 91:303–310. PMID: 17575474.
Article
15. Otsubo E, Takei T, Nomura M. Synthesis, purification and surface activities of the human pulmonary surfactant protein-C (SP-C) analogue, SP-CL16 (6-28). Biol Pharm Bull. 2001; 24:1362–1365. PMID: 11767102.
16. Bae CW, Chung SH, Choi YS. Development of a synthetic surfactant using a surfactant protein-C peptide analog: in vitro studies of surface physical properties. Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57:203–208. PMID: 26632402.
Article
17. Otsubo E, Takei T. Effects of the human pulmonary surfactant protein-C (SP-C), SP-CL16 (6-28) on surface activities of surfactants with various phospholipids. Biol Pharm Bull. 2002; 25:1303–1306. PMID: 12392083.
18. Johansson J. Membrane properties and amyloid fibril formation of lung surfactant protein C. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001; 29(Pt 4):601–606. PMID: 11498036.
Article
19. Almlén A, Walther FJ, Waring AJ, Robertson B, Johansson J, Curstedt T. Synthetic surfactant based on analogues of SP-B and SP-C is superior to single-peptide surfactants in ventilated premature rabbits. Neonatology. 2010; 98:91–99. PMID: 20110733.
Article
20. Seehase M, Collins JJ, Kuypers E, Jellema RK, Ophelders DR, Ospina OL, et al. New surfactant with SP-B and C analogs gives survival benefit after inactivation in preterm lambs. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e47631. PMID: 23091635.
Article
21. Bae CW, Choi YM, Kang JH, Lee SC, Kim KL, Hahm KS. A study of surface physical properties of new surfactant using synthetic peptides of surfactant protein-B. Korean J Pediatr. 2000; 43:1059–1067.
22. Nogee LM, de Mello DE, Dehner LP, Colten HR. Brief report: deficiency of pulmonary surfactant protein B in congenital alveolar proteinosis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:406–410. PMID: 8421459.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr